Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Diabetes. Jun 15, 2022; 13(6): 422-433
Published online Jun 15, 2022. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v13.i6.422
Published online Jun 15, 2022. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v13.i6.422
Ref. | Country/region | Study population | Study design | Effect |
Dinardo et al[24], 2019 | United States | T2D, n = 282 | Cross-sectional, comparison of current smokers vs former smokers and never-smokers | Positive |
Braffett et al[14], 2019 | Multicenter (United States and Canada) | T1D, n = 1441 | Retrospective analysis of the prospective cohort study, comparison of current smokers vs former smokers and never-smokers | Positive |
Lycett et al[17], 2011 | United Kingdom | T2D, n = 10692 | Retrospective cohort study, observation of HbA1c in three groups: Continual smokers, long-term quitters, and relapsers | Negative |
Ohkuma et al[23], 2015 | Japan | T2D, n = 2490 | Cross-sectional study, comparison of current smokers and former smokers vs never-smokers | Positive |
Su et al[26], 2017 | China | T2D, n = 7763 | Cross-sectional study, comparison of current smokers, former smokers and never-smokers | Positive |
Li et al[28], 2017 | Hong Kong of China | T2D, n = 557 | A randomized controlled trial, comparison of level of HbA1c and changes from baseline to 12-mo between quitters and non-quitters | Neutral |
Kar et al[29], 2016 | United States, Japan | T1D + T2D, n = 13719 | Metanalysis, comparison of current smokers vs quitters | Neutral |
Voulgari et al[57], 2011 | Greece | T2D, n = 193 | Prospective study, comparison of smokers vs former-smokers | Positive |
Feodoroff et al[69], 2016 | Finland | T1D, n = 3613 | Prospective study, comparison of smokers vs non-smokers and former-smokers vs non-smokers | Positive |
Reynolds et al[68], 2011 | United States | T1D, n = 2124 | Cross-sectional analysis of population-based study, comparison of current smokers vs non-smokers and former-smokers vs non-smokers | Neutral |
Reynolds et al[68], 2011 | United States | T2D, n = 348 | Cross-sectional study, comparison of current smokers vs non-smokers and former-smokers vs non-smokers | Neutral |
Ref. | Country | Study population | Study design | Effect |
Reynolds et al[68], 2011 | United States | T1D, n = 2124 | Cross-sectional analysis of population-based study, comparison of current smokers vs non-smokers and former-smokers vs non-smokers | LDL–negative; HDL–neutral; TG–positive |
Reynolds et al[68], 2011 | United States | T2D, n = 348 | Cross-sectional study, comparison of current smokers vs non-smokers and former-smokers vs non-smokers | Neutral |
Luque-Ramírez et al[12], 2018 | Spain | T2D, n = 890 | Cross-sectional, observational study, comparison of smokers vs former-smokers | LDL–neutral; HDL–positive; TG–positive |
Voulgari et al[57], 2011 | Greece | T2D, n = 193 | Prospective study, comparison of smokers vs former-smokers | LDL–positive; HDL–positive; TG–positive |
Feodoroff et al[69], 2016 | Finland | T1D, n = 3613 | Prospective study, comparison of smokers vs non-smokers and former-smokers vs non-smokers | LDL–neutral; HDL–positive; TG–neutral |
Ref. | Country | Study population | Study design | Effect |
Ohkuma et al[77], 2016 | Japan | T2D, n = 2770 | Cross-sectional study, comparison of smokers, former-smokers and never-smokers | UACR–positive with increasing years after quitting |
Voulgari et al[57], 2011 | Greece | T2D, n = 193 | Prospective study, comparison of smokers vs former-smokers | Microalbuminuria–positive |
Feodoroff et al[69], 2016 | Finland | T1D, n = 3613 | Prospective study, comparison of smokers vs non-smokersand former-smokers vs non-smokers | Micro- and macroalbuminuria–positive |
- Citation: Walicka M, Russo C, Baxter M, John I, Caci G, Polosa R. Impact of stopping smoking on metabolic parameters in diabetes mellitus: A scoping review. World J Diabetes 2022; 13(6): 422-433
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v13/i6/422.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v13.i6.422