Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Diabetes. Jun 15, 2020; 11(6): 261-268
Published online Jun 15, 2020. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v11.i6.261
Published online Jun 15, 2020. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v11.i6.261
Table 1 Measurement and comparison of waist circumference, body mass index, blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, and glycosylated protein before and after lifestyle interventions
Value | Before intervention | After intervention | Paired t-test | |
t | P value | |||
Waist circumference (cm) | 97.83 ± 7.81 | 96.99 ± 7.65 | 10.02 | < 0.001 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 29.20 ± 3.64 | 28.52 ± 3.21 | 5.82 | < 0.001 |
SBP (mmHg) | 150.53 ± 21.07 | 141.15 ± 17.49 | 6.03 | < 0.001 |
DBP (mmHg) | 87.14 ± 13.52 | 84.36 ± 10.55 | 1.84 | < 0.001 |
Fasting blood glucose (mmol/L) | 11.22 ± 2.78 | 8.40 ± 1.81 | 6.21 | < 0.001 |
Glycosylated hemoglobin (%) | 8.94 ± 1.92 | 8.06 ± 1.32 | 5.87 | < 0.001 |
Table 2 Measurement and comparison of body composition before and after lifestyle interventions
Value | Before intervention | After intervention | Paired t-test | |
t | P value | |||
Lower limb muscle distribution coefficient (Phantom ratio) | 0.92 ± 0.24 | 1.07 ± 0.23 | -10.64 | < 0.001 |
Fat distribution/ calculation (g/cm) | 171.37 ± 50.62 | 167.43 ± 49.99 | 3.88 | < 0.001 |
Percentage/calculation of fat (%) | 36.28 ± 8.23 | 35.57 ± 8.50 | 4.63 | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Measurement and comparison of nerve and body reaction velocity before and after lifestyle interventions
Value | Before intervention | After intervention | Paired t-test | |
t | P value | |||
Nerve response velocity of left lower limb (s) | 0.24 ± 0.15 | 0.23 ± 0.14 | 4.84 | < 0.001 |
Nerve response velocity of right lower limb (s) | 0.25 ± 0.09 | 0.24 ± 0.09 | 6.76 | < 0.001 |
Body reaction speed of left lower limb (s) | 0.44 ± 0.16 | 0.39 ± 0.14 | 9.56 | < 0.001 |
Body reaction speed of right lower limb (s) | 0.45 ± 0.17 | 0.41 ± 0.14 | 9.30 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Wang B, Mu XL, Zhao J, Jiang HP, Li SS, Yan G, Hua YY, Ren XY, Xing LX, Liang Y, Zhang SD, Zhao YC. Effects of lifestyle interventions on rural patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. World J Diabetes 2020; 11(6): 261-268
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v11/i6/261.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v11.i6.261