Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Diabetes. Apr 15, 2020; 11(4): 100-114
Published online Apr 15, 2020. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v11.i4.100
Table 1 Efficacy and safety of Gla-300 vs Gla-100 across the EDITION Phase 3 Clinical Trial Program
Study (ref.) / RegistryDiabetes typePopulationn (Gla-300 vs Gla-100)Mean baseline A1C (%)LS mean change in A1C from baseline to Month 6 (%)
TEAEs (%)
Serious TEAEs (%)
Gla-300Gla-100Gla-300Gla-100Gla-300Gla-100
EDITION 1[15], NCT01499082T2DM(1) Basal insulin users (≥ 42 U/d); (2) T2DM not adequately controlled; and (3) Basal insulin (evening) + mealtime insulin807 (404 vs 403)8.2-0.83-0.83NANA6.45.2
Difference: -0.00%, (95%CI: -0.11 to 0.11)
EDITION 2[25], NCT01499095T2DM(1) Basal insulin users (≥ 42 U/d); and (2) Basal insulin (evening) + OADs811 (404 vs 407)8.2-0.57-0.5658.850.73.73.7
Difference: -0.01%, (95%CI: -0.14 to 0.12)
EDITION 3[26], NCT01676220T2DMInsulin-naïve (evening), uncontrolled using noninsulin therapy878 (439 vs 439)8.5-1.42-1.46NANA5.55.9
Difference: 0.04%, (95%CI -0.09 to 0.17)
EDITION 4[27], NCT01683266T1DMBasal insulin (morning or evening) + mealtime insulin549 (274 vs 275)8.1-0.42-0.4460.958.26.28.0
Difference: 0.04%, (95%CI -0.10 to 0.19)
EDITION JP 1[28], NCT01689129T1DM(1) Japanese study; and (2) Basal insulin (evening) + mealtime insulin243 (122 vs 121)8.1-0.30-0.4362.364.52.52.5
Difference: 0.13%, (95%CI -0.03 to 0.29)
EDITION JP 2[29], NCT01689142T2DM(1) Japanese study; and (2) Basal insulin (evening) + OADs240 (120 vs 120)8.0-0.45-0.5558.356.74.23.3
Difference: 0.10%, (95%CI -0.08 to 0.27)
Table 2 Risk of hypoglycaemia for Gla-300 vs Gla-100 across the EDITION Phase 3 Clinical Trial Program (Safety population)
Study (ref.)Confirmed [≤ 3.9 mmol/L (≤ 70 mg/dL)] or severe hypoglycaemia
At any time of the day
Nocturnal
At any time of the day
Severe hypoglycaemia
Baseline to Week 8
Week 9 to Month 6
Baseline to Month 6
Baseline to Week 8
Week 9 to Month 6
Baseline to Month 6
Baseline to Month 6
Gla-300Gla-100Gla-300Gla-100Gla-300Gla-100Gla-300Gla-100Gla-300Gla-100Gla-300Gla-100Gla-300Gla-100
EDITION 1[15]Patients (%)26.233.336.145.844.657.564.475.174.877.681.987.85.05.7
RR (95%CI)0.79 (0.64-0.98)0.79 (0.67-0.93)0.78 (0.68-0.89)0.86 (0.78-0.94)0.96 (0.89-1.04)0.93 (0.88-0.99)0.87 (0.48-1.55)
EDITION 2[25]Patients (%)13.224.621.627.928.339.947.160.159.365.070.077.31.01.2
RR (95%CI)0.53 (0.39-0.72)0.77 (0.60-0.97)0.71 (0.58-0.86)0.78 (0.69-0.89)0.91 (0.82-1.02)0.90 (0.83-0.98)NA
EDITION 3[26]Patients (%)7.410.015.417.117.923.524.129.239.846.346.252.50.90.9
RR (95%CI)0.74 (0.48-1.13)0.90 (0.67-1.22)0.76 (0.59-0.99)0.83 (0.67-1.03)0.86 (0.74-1.00)0.88 (0.77-1.01)NA
EDITION 4[27]Patients (%)46.757.159.155.668.670.288.390.282.184.093.193.56.69.5
RR (95%CI)0.82 (0.70-0.96)1.06 (0.92-1.23)0.98 (0.88-1.09)0.98 (0.92-1.04)0.98 (0.91-1.06)1.00 (0.95-1.04)0.71 (0.41-1.24)
EDITION JP 1[28]Patients (%)43.461.261.773.768.981.086.995.094.293.296.797.55.79.9
RR (95%CI)0.71 (0.56-0.91)0.84 (0.70-1.00)0.85 (0.73-0.99)0.91 (0.84-0.99)1.01 (0.95-1.08)0.99 (0.95-1.04)0.58 (0.24-1.42)
EDITION JP 2[29]Patients (%)13.316.725.443.728.345.837.555.060.272.365.076.72.51.7
RR (95%CI)0.83 (0.45-1.52)0.58 (0.40-0.85)0.62 (0.44-0.88)0.69 (0.52-0.91)0.84 (0.70-1.01)0.86 (0.73-1.01)1.25 (0.31-4.98)