Copyright
©2010 Baishideng.
World J Diabetes. May 15, 2010; 1(2): 36-47
Published online May 15, 2010. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v1.i2.36
Published online May 15, 2010. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v1.i2.36
S No | Method | Comments | Advantages | Disadvantages |
1 | Hyperinsulinemic euglycemic glucose clamp | Gold standard method for quantifying insulin sensitivity | Direct measure of insulin under steady-state conditions | Laborious, involves intra venous infusion of insulin, frequent blood sampling |
2 | Oral glucose tolerance test | Clinically used to detect glucose intolerance | Helps in estimating other surrogate indices | Useful for glucose tolerance but not for IR |
3 | Fasting insulin | Most practical method to measure IR | Detects insulin resistance before clinical disease appears | Lack of standardization of the insulin assay procedure |
4 | Glucose/insulin ratio (G/I ratio) | comparable to insulin sensitivity measured by the FSIVGTTT | Highly sensitive & specific for insulin sensitivity | Does not aptly reveal the physiology of insulin sensitivity |
5 | Insulinogenic index (IGI) | index of β-cell function δI (0-30 min)/δG (0-30 min) | Measure of first-phase insulin response to glucose challenge | Not broadly validated |
6 | Homeostasis model assessment | Assesses inherent β-cell function and insulin sensitivity HOMA-IR = (G × I)/22.5 | Simple, minimally invasive, predicts fasting steady-state G and I levels | Insulin sensitivity in subjects treated with insulin needs further validation |
7 | Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) | Mathematical transformation of FBG and insulin QUICKI = 1/[log (IμU/mL) + log(G mg/dL)] | Consistent, precise index of insulin sensitivity, minimally invasive | Normal range to be established for each laboratory due to significant inter laboratory variations in insulin assay |
8 | Minimal model analysis of frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test | Indirect measure of insulin sensitivity/resistance | Analysis using the computer program MINMOD | Multiple blood sampling |
9 | Glucose insulin (GI) product | Index of whole-body insulin sensitivity | ||
10 | Fasting insulin resistance index (FIRI) | (fasting G × fasting I)/25 |
S No | Method | Measurement | Comments |
1 | Matsuda index | 10 000/√ (fasting G × fasting I) (mean G × mean I) | Represents both hepatic and peripheral tissue sensitivity to insulin |
2 | Gutt index | 75 000 + (G0 - G120) (mg/dL) × 0.19 × BW/120 × Gmean(0, 120) (mmol/L) × Log [Imean(0, 120)] (mU/L) | Good to predict onset of type 2 diabetes |
3 | Stumvoll index | 0.156 - 0.0000459 × I120 (pmol/L) – 0.000321 × I0 (pmol/L) – 0.00541 × G120 (mmol/L) | Utilizes demographic data like age, sex and BMI along with plasma glucose and insulin to predict insulin sensitivity |
4 | Avignon index | Sib = 108/[I0 (mU/L) × G0 (mmol/L) × VD) Si2h = 108/(I120 (mU/L) × G120 (mmol/L) × VD] | Determines glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity in single test |
5 | Oral glucose insulin sensitivity index | G and I concentrations from a 75 g OGTT at 0, 2, and 3 h (3 h OGTT) or at 0, 1.5, and 2 h (2 h OGTT). The formula includes six constants | |
6 | Log (HOMA-IR) | Evaluates insulin resistance in insulin-resistant states like glucose intolerance and mild to moderate diabetes |
S No | Marker |
1 | Insulin growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) |
2 | sCD36 (solubleCD36) |
3 | C-reactive protein (CRP) |
4 | Ferritin |
5 | Adiponectin |
6 | Tumour necrosis factor (TNF alpha) |
7 | Resistin |
8 | C3 complement |
9 | Glycosylated hemoglobin (Hb)A1c |
10 | Protein kinase C (PKC) in microangiopathy |
11 | Sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) in hyperandrogenic syndrome |
- Citation: Singh B, Saxena A. Surrogate markers of insulin resistance: A review. World J Diabetes 2010; 1(2): 36-47
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v1/i2/36.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v1.i2.36