Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Oct 16, 2017; 9(10): 514-520
Published online Oct 16, 2017. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i10.514
Published online Oct 16, 2017. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i10.514
Table 1 Background characteristics of the patients in relation to the bleeding status
Hemorrhage after ESD | P value | ||
Negative | Positive | ||
Number | 210 | 33 | |
Age (yr) | 73.9 ± 8.0 | 71.7 ± 9.4 | 0.14 |
Gender (M/F) | 151/59 | 8/25 | 0.65 |
Antiplatelet/anticoagulant drugs (-/+) | 161/49 | 8/25 | 0.91 |
Hypertension (-/+) | 123/87 | 20/13 | 0.83 |
Diabetes mellitus (-/+) | 186/24 | 4/27 | 0.52 |
H. pylori infection (-/+) | 90/120 | 13/20 | 0.89 |
Location (U/M/L) | 28/96/86 | 2/15/16 | 0.45 |
Depth (m/sm) | 190/20 | 5/28 | 0.35 |
Ulcer (-/+) | 205/5 | 33/0 | 0.37 |
Diameter of the lesion (mm) | 40.7 ± 15.3 | 40.4 ± 13.9 | 0.89 |
Duration of the operation (min) | 106.9 ± 64.1 | 123.8 ± 98.5 | 0.2 |
Macroscopic type of the lesion (elevated or flat/combined/depressed) | 130/29/51 | 5/10/2018 | 0.49 |
Pathological findings (Adenoma/Differentiated ca/Undifferentiated ca) | 76/126/8 | 12/21/0 | 0.32 |
Lymphatic/venous invasion (-/+) | 206/4 | Jan-32 | 0.67 |
Anastomosis (-/+) | 200/10 | 33/0 | 0.2 |
Operator type (expert/beginner) | 129/81 | 14/19 | 0.0392 |
Bleeding during ESD (good/poor control) | 164/46 | 9/24 | 0.49 |
Table 2 Background characteristics of the patients according to the treatment group before the propensity score matching
EPZ group | OPZ group | P value | |
Number | 71 | 172 | |
Age (yr) | 75.3 ± 7.1 | 72.9 ± 8.5 | 0.0361 |
Gender (M/F) | 52/19 | 124/48 | 0.86 |
Antiplatelet/anticoagulant drugs (-/+) | 50/21 | 136/36 | 0.15 |
Hypertension (-/+) | 40/31 | 103/69 | 0.61 |
Diabetes Mellitus (-/+) | Sep-62 | 151/21 | 0.92 |
H. pylori infection (-/+) | 29/42 | 55/117 | 0.19 |
Location (U/M/L) | 10/34/27 | 20/77/75 | 0.7 |
Depth (m/sm) | 57/14 | 161/11 | 0.0019 |
Ulcer (-/+) | 71/0 | 167/5 | 0.15 |
Diameter of the lesion (mm) | 42.2 ± 17.2 | 40.14 ± 14.1 | 0.31 |
Duration of the operation (min) | 115.9 ± 87.3 | 106.4 ± 61.1 | 0.34 |
Macroscopic type of the lesion (elevated or flat/combined/depressed) | 46/16/9 | 102/18/52 | 0.003 |
Pathological findings (Adenoma/Differentiated ca/Undifferentiated ca) | 26/42/3 | 62/105/5 | 0.86 |
Lymphatic/venous invasion (-/+) | Jan-70 | 168/4 | 0.65 |
Anastomosis (-/+) | Mar-68 | 163/9 | 0.74 |
Operator type (expert/beginner) | 31/40 | 112/60 | 0.002 |
Bleeding during ESD (good/poor control) | 55/16 | 134/38 | 0.94 |
Hemorrhage after ESD (-/+) | 149/23 | Oct-61 | 0.88 |
Clinically significant bleeding (-/+) | 165/7 | Mar-68 | 0.96 |
Table 3 Background characteristics of the patients according to the treatment group after the propensity score matching
EPZ group | OPZ group | P value | |
Number | 65 | 65 | |
Age (yr) | 75.2 ± 7.3 | 75.0 ± 7.5 | 0.9 |
Gender (M/F) | 46/19 | 44/21 | 0.85 |
Antiplatelet/anticoagulant drugs (-/+) | 46/19 | 44/21 | 0.85 |
Hypertension (-/+) | 37/28 | 33/32 | 0.6 |
Diabetes Mellitus (-/+) | Aug-57 | Dec-53 | 0.47 |
H. pylori infection (-/+) | 26/39 | 23/42 | 0.72 |
Location (U/M/L) | 5/33/27 | 10/24/31 | 0.19 |
Depth (m/sm) | Sep-56 | Jun-59 | 0.58 |
Ulcer (-/+) | 65/0 | 65/0 | 0 |
Diameter of the lesion (mm) | 41.9 ± 18.5 | 39.6 ± 12.1 | 0.4 |
Duration of the operation (min) | 110.6 ± 85.7 | 102.0 ± 54.9 | 0.5 |
Macroscopic type of the lesion (elevated or flat/combined/depressed) | 42/14/9 | 10/8/1947 | 0.6 |
Pathological findings (Adenoma/Differentiated ca/Undifferentiated ca) | 26/37/2 | 29/35/1 | 0.76 |
Lymphatic/venous invasion (-/+) | Jan-64 | Feb-63 | ≥ 0.99 |
Anastomosis (-/+) | Mar-62 | Mar-62 | ≥ 0.99 |
Operator type (expert/beginner) | 29/36 | 27/38 | 0.86 |
Bleeding during ESD (good/poor control) | 51/14 | 49/16 | 0.84 |
Hemorrhage after ESD (-/+) | Oct-55 | Nov-54 | ≥ 0.99 |
Clinically significant bleeding (-/+) | Apr-61 | Mar-62 | ≥ 0.99 |
- Citation: Uchiyama T, Higurashi T, Kuriyama H, Kondo Y, Hata Y, Nakajima A. Oral esomeprazole vs injectable omeprazole for the prevention of hemorrhage after endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 9(10): 514-520
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v9/i10/514.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v9.i10.514