Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Feb 25, 2016; 8(4): 232-238
Published online Feb 25, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i4.232
Published online Feb 25, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i4.232
Table 1 Participants’ demographics for endoscopist-administered sedation and anaesthesiologist-administered sedation with propofol groups n (%)
EAC (n = 104) | AAP (n = 126) | P-value | |
Male sex - frequency | 60 (57.7) | 46 (36.5) | 0.001 |
Age | 59.8 (11.6) | 57.1 (13.3) | 0.101 |
Weight | 183.3 (49.1) | 174.6 (46.5) | 0.169 |
Height | 67.6 (4.2) | 66.3 (4.0) | 0.016 |
BMI | 28.0 (6.5) | 27.7 (6.2) | 0.750 |
Indication - symptomatic | 33 (31.7) | 55 (43.7) | 0.064 |
Intervention | 0.936 | ||
None | 31 (29.8) | 37 (29.4) | |
Diagnostic | 25 (24.0) | 34 (27.0) | |
Therapeutic | 36 (34.6) | 43 (34.1) | |
Diagnostic and therapeutic | 12 (11.5) | 12 (9.5) | |
ASA class | 0.089 | ||
1 | 42 (40.4) | 52 (41.3) | |
2 | 54 (51.9) | 53 (42.1) | |
3 | 8 (7.7) | 21 (16.7) |
Table 2 Multivariate analysis of procedure measurables
Coefficient | P-value | |
BMI | -0.008 | 0.008 |
ASA class | 0.066 | 0.016 |
Intervention - diagnostic | 0.084 | 0.033 |
Intervention - therapeutic | 0.246 | < 0.001 |
Propofol sedation (AAP) | 0.091 | 0.002 |
Resident involved | 0.391 | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Procedure time and total procedure room time with removal of trainee presence (staff endoscopist data only) for endoscopist-administered sedation and anaesthesiologist-administered sedation with propofol groups
EAC (n = 89) | AAP (n = 75) | P-value | |
Total procedure time | |||
Mean ± SD | 13.0 ± 4.9 min | 12.9 ± 4.8 min | 0.941 |
Total room time | |||
Mean ± SD | 28.1 ± 9.3 min | 31.1 ± 10.1 min | 0.019 |
Table 4 Results of the telephone patient satisfaction survey for endoscopist-administered sedation and anaesthesiologist-administered sedation with propofol groups n (%)
EAC (n = 104) | AAP (n = 126) | P-value | |
Response rate | 74 (71) | 80 (64) | 0.219 |
Question 1: I was very satisfied with the care I received | 0.074 | ||
Agree | 15 (20) | 8 (10) | |
Strongly agree | 59 (80) | 72 (90) | |
Question 2: I would strongly recommend this procedure to friends who qualify for it | 0.882 | ||
Disagree | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0.0) | |
Not sure | 2 (2.7) | 6 (7.5) | |
Agree | 16 (22) | 13 (16) | |
Strongly agree | 55 (74) | 61 (76) | |
Question 3: I would be willing to repeat this examination again in the future if necessary | 0.667 | ||
Disagree | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.3) | |
Not sure | 2 (2.7) | 0 (0.0) | |
Agree | 8 (11) | 12 (15) | |
Strongly agree | 64 (87) | 67 (84) | |
Question 4: I did not experience too much pain/discomfort during the procedure | 0.021 | ||
Strongly disagree | 4 (5.4) | 0 (0.0) | |
Disagree | 5 (6.8) | 2 (2.5) | |
Not sure | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0.0) | |
Agree | 7 (9.5) | 6 (7.5) | |
Strongly agree | 57 (77) | 72 (90) |
Table 5 Study endpoints - comparing staff endoscopists only with cases involving resident participation
Resident involved (n = 66) | Staff endoscopist only (n = 164) | P-value | |
Total procedure time | < 0.001 | ||
Mean ± SD | 26.0 ± 10.2 | 12.9 ± 4.8 | < 0.001 |
Total room time | < 0.001 | ||
Mean ± SD | 44.4 ± 13.7 | 29.5 ± 9.8 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Thornley P, Al Beshir M, Gregor J, Antoniou A, Khanna N. Efficiency and patient experience with propofol vs conventional sedation: A prospective study. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8(4): 232-238
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v8/i4/232.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v8.i4.232