Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jan 25, 2016; 8(2): 77-85
Published online Jan 25, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i2.77
Published online Jan 25, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i2.77
Stent type | Stent failure rates in malignant obstruction |
Plastic stents | 30%-70% |
Self expanding metal stents | 19%-46% |
Causes of stent failure | Percent of total failures |
Tumor ingrowth | 66%-68% |
Epithelial ingrowth | |
Biliary clogging | 17%-21% |
Tumor overgrowth | 2%-11% |
Stent migration | 0%-4% |
Ref. | Journal | Study design | Study results |
In vitro | |||
Rees et al[17] | Journal of Hospital Infection (1998) | In vitro | BZC and Teflon reduced the number of organisms attached to stents |
- control (polyurethane) | |||
- benzalkonium chloride (BZC) | |||
- ePTFE (Teflon) | |||
Cetta et al[18] | The European Journal of Surgery (1999) | In vitro | Heparin and hyaluronic acid coating reduced biofilm development |
5 stents - control (polyurethane) | |||
5 stents - heparin + hyaluronic acid | |||
Weickert et al[21] | Advances in Medical Sciences (2011) | In vitro | Stents coated with hydrophobin or both hydrophobin and heparin reduced clogging material scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images |
7 stents - control (polyethylene) | |||
4 stents - hydrophobin (H) | |||
3 stents - H + ampicillin/sulbactam | |||
3 stents - H + levofloxacin | |||
3 stents - H + heparin | |||
Animals | |||
Gwon et al[22] | Acta Radiologica (2012) | Canine model | Cefotaxime did not prevent biofilm development (gross inspection, SEM images) |
3 stents - control (ePTFE) | |||
3 stents - 10% wt/vol cefotaxime | |||
3 stents - 20% wt/vol cefotaxime | |||
Humans | |||
Farnbacher et al[19] | Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology (2012) | Randomized prospective | Heparin is effective in preventing encrustation on stents (encrustation weighed) |
13 stents - control (polyethylene) | |||
13 stents (same patients) - heparin |
Ref. | Journal | Study design | Study results |
Humans | |||
Barrioz et al[48] | Lancet (1994) | Randomized prospective | Drugs were associated with longer stent patency and shorter hospital stay |
25 - conservative treatment | |||
21 - ursodeoxycholic acid and norfloxacin | |||
Coene et al[49] | Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology (1994) | Randomized prospective | Bile clogging did not correlate with bile viscosity. Mucolytic agents or antibiotics only effective when bile is highly viscous |
60 patients received either | |||
co-trimoxazole or | |||
N-acetylcysteine | |||
Smit et al[50] | Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (1989) | Randomized prospective | Both doxycycline and aspirin reduced the dry weight of sludge. Doxycycline improved patient survival |
30 patients received either | |||
placebo or | |||
doxycycline or | |||
aspirin | |||
Halm | Endoscopy (2001) | Randomized prospective | No difference in patient survival or stent occlusion |
26 - ursodeoxycholic acid | |||
26 - ursodeoxycholic acid + ofloxacin | |||
De Lédinghen et al[51] | Digestive Diseases and Sciences (2000) | Randomized prospective | No difference in stent patency and patient survival |
29 - conservative treatment | |||
33 - ursodeoxycholic acid and norfloxacin | |||
In vitro | |||
Tsang et al[52] | Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine (1997) | In vitro | Ampicillin and sulbactam inhibited biofilm formation |
4 - porcine bile | |||
4 - porcine bile + ampicillin + sulbactam |
Ref. | Journal | Study design | Study results |
Animals | |||
Lee et al[38] | Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (2005) | Porcine model | Paclitaxel-eluting stents caused mild adverse effects, but are safe to use in porcine models |
2 pigs - control (metallic) | |||
2 pigs - 10% wt/v Paclitaxel | |||
2 pigs - 20% wt/v Paclitaxel | |||
Lee et al[40] | Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (2009) | Canine model | Paclitaxel-eluting stents caused mild adverse effects, but are safe to use in canine models |
5 dogs - control (metallic) | |||
6 dogs - 20% wt/v paclitaxel | |||
Lee et al[44] | International Journal of Pharmaceutics (2012) | In vitro, murine model | Stents coated with gemcitabine reduced the size of subcutaneous tumor in vitro and in mice |
5 mice - no stenting | |||
5 mice - polyurethane | |||
5 mice - 0% wt/v gemcitabine | |||
5 mice - 8% wt/v gemcitabine | |||
5 mice - 12% wt/v gemcitabine | |||
Chung et al[45] | Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (2012) | Porcine model | Gemcitabine-eluting stents cause mild to severe inflammation, but are safe to use in porcine models |
2 pigs - 0% wt/v gemcitabine | |||
2 pigs - 10% wt/v gemcitabine | |||
2 pigs - 15% wt/v gemcitabine | |||
2 pigs - 20% wt/v gemcitabine | |||
Jang et al[41] | Endoscopy (2012) | Porcine model | Greater patency observed when stents were coated with pluronic with paclitaxel. Stents are safe to use in porcine models |
2 pigs - 0% wt/v paclitaxel | |||
2 pigs - 0% Pluronic + 10% taxol | |||
2 pigs - 10% Pluronic + 10% taxol | |||
2 pigs - 20% Pluronic + 10% taxol | |||
Kim do et al[46] | International Journal of Nanomedicine (2013) | In vitro, murine model | Sorafenib-loaded film inhibited the growth of human cholangiocarcinoma cells in vitro and in mice |
10 mice - control (no stenting) | |||
10 mice - PCL film | |||
10 mice - sorafenib-loaded film | |||
Shi et al[42] | European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (2013) | Canine model | No adverse effects |
10 dogs - control (no stenting) | less granulation tissue and glandular hyperplasia in dogs with paclitaxel stents | ||
10 dogs - Poly-L-lactic acid coated metallic stents (PLLA) | |||
10 dogs - PLLA + 1 mg paclitaxel/stent | |||
10 dogs - PLLA + 2 mg paclitaxel/stent | |||
Bang et al[43] | Gastroenterology Research and Practice (2015) | Murine model | Tumor angiogenesis inhibited in mice with Paclitaxel stents through multiple molecular mechanisms |
8 mice - control (polyurethane) | |||
8 mice - control + Pluronic | |||
8 mice - Pluronic + 5% paclitaxel | |||
8 mice - Pluronic + 10% paclitaxel | |||
Humans | |||
Suk et al[2] | Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (2007) | Randomized prospective | Paclitaxel-eluting stents are safe and effective. Occlusion in 9 patients, mean patency was 429 d |
21 patients - 10% wt/v paclitaxel | |||
Jang et al[3] | Digestive Diseases and Sciences (2013) | Randomized prospective | No significant differences in stent patency or patient survival, but stents proved safe to use in humans |
46 patients - control (metallic) | |||
60 patients - 10% wt/v paclitaxel |
- Citation: Shatzel J, Kim J, Sampath K, Syed S, Saad J, Hussain ZH, Mody K, Pipas JM, Gordon S, Gardner T, Rothstein RI. Drug eluting biliary stents to decrease stent failure rates: A review of the literature. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8(2): 77-85
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v8/i2/77.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v8.i2.77