Prospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Nov 16, 2016; 8(19): 709-715
Published online Nov 16, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i19.709
Table 1 Risk factors for pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography n (%)
No pancreatitisPancreatitisP-value
894 (89.9)102 (10.2)
Patient related factors
Median age (yr)60480.0001
Age group
< 3532 (7.2)20 (39.2)0.0001
> 35415 (92.8)31 (60.8)
Sex
Male510 (57)44 (43.1)0.05
Female384 (43)58 (56.9)
Median serum bilirubin (mg%)10.612.50.76
< 2124 (88.6)16 (11.4)
> 2770 (90)86 (10)0.72
Median CBD diameter (mm)16100.0001
< 1070 (7.8)58 (56.9)
> 10824 (92.2)44 (43.1)0.0001
Indication for ERCP
Malignant402 (45)40 (39.2)0.43
Benign492 (55)62 (60.8)
Type of papilla
Normal540 (60.4)56 (54.9)0.01
Atrophic18 (2)8 (7.8)
Pregnant68 (7.6)2 (2)
Tumour64 (7.2)4 (3.9)
Redundant66(7.4)12 (11.8)
Juxtadivericular68 (7.6)16 (15.7)
Small60 (6.6)2 (2)
Long10 (1.1)2 (2)
Procedure related factors
Number of cannulation attempts
< 5660 (73.9)58 (56.9)0.01
≥ 6234 (26.1)44 (43.1)
Number of pancreatic cannulations020.0001
< 3 times864 (96.6)60 (58.8)
> 3 times28 (3.4)42 (41.2)0.0001
Method of cannulation
Conventional640 (89.4)76 (10.6)0.7
Precut252 (90.6)26 (9.4)
Biliary sphincter balloon dilatation
No654 (73.2)86 (84.3)0.08
Yes240 (26.8)16 (15.7)
Table 2 Predictors of severity of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography n (%)
Mild to moderate pancreatitis (80)Severe pancreatitis (22)P-value
Patient related factors
Median age (yr)52300.0001
Age
< 3526 (32.5)14 (63.6)0.0001
> 3554 (67.5)8 (36.4)
Sex
Male38 (47.5)6 (27.3)0.08
Female42 (52.5)16 (72.7)
Median serum bilirubin (mg%)14.19.90.3
< 28 (50)8 (50)
> 272 (85.7)14 (14.3)0.07
Median CBD diameter (mm)1090.0001
< 1042 (52.5)16 (72.7%)
> 1038 (47.5)6 (27.3%)0.0001
Indication for ERCP
Malignant39 (97.5)1 (2.5)0.009
Benign41 (66.1)21 (33.9)
Type of papilla
Normal39170.06
Atrophic62
Pregnant02
Tumour40
Redundant93
Juxtadivericular151
Small20
Long20
Procedure related factors
No. of cannulation attempts
< 546 (57.5)12 (54.5)0.03
≥ 634 (27.5)10 (45.5)
Median number of pancreatic cannulations240.0001
< 3 times58 (72.5)2 (9.1)0.0001
> 3 times22 (52.4)20 (90.9)
Method of cannulation
Conventional58 (72.5)18 (81.8)0.07
Precut22 (52.4)4 (18.2)
Biliary sphincter balloon dilatation
No70 (87.5)16 (72.7)0.1
Yes10 (12.5)6 (27.3)
Table 3 Multivariate logistic regression for analysis of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
VariableP-valueOdds ratio95%CI for EXP(B)
LowerUpper
Age group0.0010.0350.0050.259
Age0.5191.0120.9761.050
Sex0.3620.1430.0750.270
CBD diameter below 10 mm0.6090.7260.2122.481
CBD diameter0.0000.6120.4950.757
Difficult cannulation0.2070.4760.1501.506
No. of pancreatic cannulations below 30.1170.2190.0331.460
No. of pancreatic cannulations0.0005.2582.66510.370
Papilla0.964