Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Oct 16, 2016; 8(18): 646-652
Published online Oct 16, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i18.646
Published online Oct 16, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i18.646
Table 1 Patients’ characteristics
Gender (male/female), n (%) | 49 (40.8)/71 (59) |
Age (years), mean ± SD | 67.8 yr ± 15.7 |
Patients at 1st ERCP, n (%) | 91 (75.8) |
Patients previously treated with endoscopic sphincterotomy, n (%) | 29 (24.2) |
Ampullary/periampullary diverticulum, n (%) | 37 (30.8) |
Bile duct stones size (mm), mean ± SD | 15.8 ± 2.9 |
Bile duct size (mm), mean ± SD | 19.2 ± 3.9 |
Billroth I reconstruction, n (%) | 3 (2.5) |
Table 2 Final results
Elective ERCP vs rescue ERCP, n (%) | 117 (97.5) vs 3 (2.5) |
Common bile duct cannulation technique, n (%) | |
Cannulation of major papilla followed by contrast medium injection | 5 (4.2) |
Cannulation of major papilla followed by guidewire insertion | 105 (87.5) |
Pre-cut | 10 (8.3) |
Involuntary insertion of the guidewire into Wirsung, n (%) | 25 (20.8) |
Indication for DASE, n (%) | |
Large stones | 83 (69.2) |
Periampullary diverticulum | 37 (30.8) |
DASE, n (%) | |
As first approach | 45 (38) |
After stone extraction | 75 (62) |
Balloon size (mm), mean ± SD | 16.7 ± 3.6 |
Dilation time (s), mean ± SD | 51 ± 13.8 |
Sphincterotomy incision, n (%) | |
Limited to one-third of the transverse fold | 68 (56.7) |
Full length of the transverse fold | 52 (43.3) |
Procedural success, n (%) | |
Technical success | 109 (90.8) |
Clinical success | 104 (86.7) |
Stones extraction, n (%) | |
Retrieval balloon | 61 (51.8) |
Dormia basket | 59 (49.2) |
Post-ERCP pancreatitis prophylaxis, n (%) | |
None | 38 (31.4) |
Pancreatic plastic stent | 14 (11.8) |
Indometacin suppositories | 68 (56.8) |
Table 3 Complications after Dilation-Assisted Stone Extraction
Complications, n (%) | |
No | 98 (81.7) |
Yes | 22 (18.3) |
Type of complications, n (%) | |
Bleeding | 11 (9.2) |
Post-ERCP pancreatitis | 10 (8.3) |
Perforation | 1 (0.8) |
Timing of complications, n (%) | |
Immediate | 8 (6.7) |
Within 24 h from the ERCP | 11 (9.2) |
After 24 h from the ERCP | 3 (2.5) |
Treatment of complications, n (%) | |
Medical | 13 (10.8) |
Endoscopic | 8 (6.7) |
Surgical | 1 (0.8) |
Outcome of complications, n (%) | |
Resolved | 21 (17.5) |
Unresolved (patient’s exitus) | 1 (0.8) |
- Citation: Di Mitri R, Mocciaro F, Pallio S, Pecoraro GM, Tortora A, Zulli C, Attardo S, Maurano A. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for the removal of bile duct stones: Data from a “real-life” multicenter study on Dilation-Assisted Stone Extraction. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8(18): 646-652
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v8/i18/646.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v8.i18.646