Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jun 10, 2016; 8(11): 418-424
Published online Jun 10, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i11.418
Published online Jun 10, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i11.418
Ref. | No. of patients | Location | Mean tumor diameter (mm) | Mean procedure time (min) | Resection method | Complete resection rate (%) | Total complication rate (%) | Mean follow-up period (mo)/recurrence in complete resection patients |
Lee et al[15] (2006) | 11 | Cardia/body | 20.7 | 60.9 | ESD | 75.0 | 0 | 10.9/N |
Jeong et al[14] (2011) | 64 | Cardia/fundus/body/antrum | 13.8 | 34.7 | Endoscopic enucleation | 92.3 | 12.3 | 10.01/N |
Liu et al[22] (2012) | 31 | Esophagus/ cardia/stomach | 22.1 | 76.8 | EMD | 96.8 | 12.9 | 17.7/N |
He et al[6] (2013) | 144 | Cardia/fundus/body/antrum | 15.1 | 63.4 | ESD | 92.4 | 14.52/4.83 | 19.1/N |
Chu et al[8] (2012) | 16 | Cardia/fundus/body/antrum | 26.1 | 52.0 | Modified ESD with enucleation | 93.8 | 0 | 14.8/N |
Li et al[20] (2013) | 11 | Fundus | 18.8 | 81.0 | ESD | 90.9 | 27.2 | 6.4/N |
Chun et al[2] (2013) | 35 | Cardia/fundus/body/antrum | 18.0 | 32.3 | ESD | 74.3 | 5.7 | 6.1/N |
Ref. | No. of patients | Location | Mean tumor diameter (mm) | Mean procedure time (min) | Resection method | Complete resection rate (%) | Total complication rate (%) | Mean follow-up period (mo)/recurrence in complete resection patients |
Inoue et al[10] (2012) | 7 | Esophagus/cardia | 19.0 | 152 | Submucosal endoscopic tumor resection | 100 | 0 | 5.5/N |
Gong et al[24] (2012) | 12 | Esophagus/cardia | 19.5 | 48.3 | ESTD | 83.3 | 16.7 | NA |
Liu et al[26] (2013) | 12 | Esophagus/cardia | 18.5 | 78.3 | tEMD | 100 | 66.7 | 7.1/N |
Ye et al[25] (2014) | 85 | Esophagus/cardia/stomach | 19.2 | 57.2 | STER | 100 | 9.4 | 81/N |
Zhou et al[27] (2015) | 21 | Esophagogastric junction | 23.0 | 62.9 | STER | 100 | 42.9 | 61/N |
Ref. | No. of patients | Location | Mean tumor diameter (mm) | Mean procedure time (min) | Resection method | Complete resection rate (%) | Total complication rate (%) | Mean follow-up period (mo)/recurrence in complete resection patients |
Hiki et al[31] (2008) | 7 | Esophagogastric junction/stomach | 46 | 169 | LECS | 100 | 0 | NA |
Abe et al[33] (2009) | 4 | Body | 30 | 201 | LAEFR | 100 | 0 | 8/N |
Tsujimoto et al[32] (2012) | 20 | Esophagogastric junction/body/antrum | 37.9 | 157.5 | LECS | 100 | 0 | 20.7/N |
Ye et al[18] (2014) | 51 | Fundus/body/antrum | 24 | 52 | EFTR | 98 | 0 | 22.41/N |
Mitsui et al[36] (2014) | 6 | Body | 22.7 | 273.5 | NEWS | 100 | 0 | 8/N |
Schmidt et al[11] (2015) | 31 | Carida/fundus/body/antrum | 20.5 | 60 | EFTR | 90.3 | 9.62/38.73 | 7 (roughly)/N |
- Citation: Kim SY, Kim KO. Management of gastric subepithelial tumors: The role of endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8(11): 418-424
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v8/i11/418.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v8.i11.418