Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. May 25, 2016; 8(10): 409-417
Published online May 25, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i10.409
Published online May 25, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i10.409
Table 1 Classification system for endoscopic findings
Group 0: No findings |
Normal study |
Group 1: Abnormal findings that do not change surgical approach/ postpone surgery |
Mild esophagitis, gastritis, and/or duodenitis |
Esophageal webs |
Group 2: Findings that change the surgical approach/postpone surgery |
Mass lesions (mucosal/submucosal) |
Ulcers (any location) |
Severe erosive esophagitis, gastritis, and/or duodenitis |
Barrett’s esophagus |
Bezoar |
Hiatal hernia (any size) |
Peptic stricture |
Zenker’s diverticula |
Esophageal diverticula |
Arteriovenous malformations |
Group 3: Absolute contraindications to surgery |
Upper GI cancer |
Varices |
Table 2 Patient characteristics
Variable | Summary = 3219 |
Age | 37 ± 9 yr |
Female:male | 79%:21% |
BMI | 43 ± 13 |
Haemoglobin | 13 ± 4 g/dL |
Upper GI symptoms: 902 (28%)1 | |
Heartburn | 19.2% |
Acid regurgitation | 17.6% |
Abdominal pain | 7.3% |
Nausea with or without vomiting | 5.7% |
Comorbedities: 1159 (36%)2 | |
Obstructive sleep apnea | 4.9% |
Hypertension | 57.8% |
Arthritis | 56.9% |
Diabetes mellitus | 40.5% |
Hypothyroidism | 36.6% |
Asthma/COPD | 15.1% |
Coronary artery disease | 9.9% |
Type of endoscopy | |
Conscious sedation | 354 (11%) |
Local anesthesia spray | 2865 (89%) |
Type of bariatric procedure | |
Vertical sleeve gastrectomy | 2415 (75%) |
Roux-en-Y gastricbypass | 322 (10%) |
Laparoscopic minigastric bypass | 482 (15%) |
Table 3 Endoscopic findings during routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and their prevalence
EGD findings | Group A (n = 902) | Group B (n = 2317) | P value |
Esophagus | |||
Normal = 65% | 19% | 46% | 0.001 |
Abnormal = 35% | 25% | 10% | 0.001 |
Hiatal hernia | 21.9% | 7.9% | |
Esophagitis | 19% | 6% | |
Barrett’s esophagus | 1.1% | 0.1% | |
Stomach | |||
Normal = 77% | 24% | 53% | 0.001 |
Abnormal = 23% | 17% | 6% | 0.001 |
Spotty gastropathy | 4% | 1.3% | |
Erythematous gastropathy | 7% | 2.5%% | |
Erosive gastropathy | 8% | 1.2%% | |
Atrophic gastropathy | 1% | 0.48% | |
Multiple polyps | 0.1% | 0.02% | |
Ulcer | 2.4% | 0.5% | |
Duodenum | |||
Normal = 87% | 23% | 64% | 0.001 |
Abnormal = 13% | 9% | 4% | 0.001 |
Erythematous bulbopathy | 6% | 2.2% | |
Erosive bulbopathy | 2.6% | 1% | |
Ulcer | 1.4% | 0.8% | |
+ve biopsy for H. pylori, 407 (14.6%) | 10.7% | 3.9% | 0.001 |
Table 4 Lesions identified on upper endoscopy and impact on bariatric surgery, n = 219 (6.8%)
Lesion | Group A | Group B | Result |
Hiatal hernia | 25% | 10% | Crural repair/reduction of hernia |
Gastritis | 17% | 6% | Medical treatment, postpone surgery |
Esophagitis | 19% | 6% | Medical treatment, postpone surgery |
Gastric ulcer | 2.4% | 0.5% | Await biopsy results, medical treatment, repeat endoscopy |
Barrett’s esophagus | 1.1% | 0.1% | Await biopsy results, medical treatment, repeat endoscopy |
Duodenal ulcer | 1.4% | 0.8% | Await Helicobacter pylori results, medical treatment |
Table 5 Univariate analysis of clinical predictors of abnormal upper endoscopy
Variables | Total population | Normal EGD (65%) | Abnormal EGD (35%) | P value |
Age (yr) | 37 ± 9 | 31 ± 9 | 43 ± 10 | 0.26 |
BMI | 43 ± 13 | 43 ± 11 | 47 ± 16 | 0.09 |
Gender (F:M) | 79%:21% | 64%:36% | 69%:31% | 0.17 |
GIT symptoms | 13.80% | 72% | 28% | 0.001 |
Haemoglobin (g/dL) | 13 ± 4 | 13 ± 3.4 | 11 ± 3.2 | 0.07 |
Comorbidities | 36% | 52% | 48% | 0.18 |
Table 6 Multivariate regression analysis of clinical predictors of abnormal esophagogastroduodenoscopy
Variables | OR | 95%CI | P value |
Age | 1.414 | 0.772-2.59 | 0.26 |
BMI | 1.092 | 0.923-1.723 | 0.38 |
Gender | 0.225 | 0.028-1.826 | 0.162 |
GIT symptoms | 2.649 | 1.904-3.684 | 0.001 |
Comorbidities | 0.68 | 0.335-1.381 | 0.286 |
Anaemia | 0.945 | 1.241-2.093 | 0.274 |
Table 7 Clinical and endoscopic characteristics of bleeding episodes
1st episode n = 119 | 2nd episode n = 40 | 3rd episode n = 11 | |
Presentation | |||
Hematemesis | 93 | 33 | 5 |
Melena | 39 | 19 | 9 |
Hypotension | 17 | 3 | - |
Management | |||
EGD | 28 | 7 | - |
Observation | 91 | 33 | 11 |
Blood transfusion | 43 | 19 | 3 |
Prominent findings on EGD | |||
Active blood oozing | 17/28 | 7/3 | |
Bleeding vessel | 28/6 | 7/4 | |
Adherent clot | 28/4 | - | |
Other findings (visible vessel, red streaks, etc.) | 28/4 | - | |
Endoscopic therapy | |||
Epinephrine injection | 10 | 5 | |
Heater probe | 9 | 4 | |
Clip | 7 | 3 |
- Citation: Abd Ellatif ME, Alfalah H, Asker WA, El Nakeeb AE, Magdy A, Thabet W, Ghaith MA, Abdallah E, Shahin R, Shoma A, Dawoud IE, Abbas A, Salama AF, Ali Gamal M. Place of upper endoscopy before and after bariatric surgery: A multicenter experience with 3219 patients. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8(10): 409-417
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v8/i10/409.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v8.i10.409