Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jul 25, 2015; 7(9): 895-911
Published online Jul 25, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i9.895
Published online Jul 25, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i9.895
Ref. | Methodology | Results | Limitations | Conclusions |
Bedirli et al[3] | Study type: prospective, randomised, double-blinded Patients: N = 80; 1–16 yr; ASA I, II Procedure: upper GI endoscopy Drugs: baseline: propofol (1 mg/kg; additional 0.5–1 mg/kg as needed); intervention: fentanyl (2 μg/kg) vs tramadol (2 mg/kg) Intended sedation level: deep sedation Additional interventions: spray of lidocaine 10%; infusion of 10 lactated Ringer’s solution (10 mL/kg per hour); supplemental oxygen 3–4 L/min) Administered by: anesthesiologist Outcome measures: Adverse events: HR (change for 20% from the baseline), BP (change for 20% from the baseline), SpO2 (< 90% for more than 15 s), respiratory rate, agitation score Effectiveness: Ramsey sedation score, duration of endoscopy, Steward recovery score, endoscopist’s rating of ease of procedure, total propofol consumption | Adverse events: self-limited bradycardia and transient desaturation in age group 0–2 yr, more in the fentanyl group Effectiveness: lower sedation scores in tramadol group; no difference of gastroenterologist rating | Only one dosage of drugs instead of titrating them | Propofol with tramadol or propofol provided efficient sedation; significantly less adverse effects in the tramadol group |
Brecelj et al[4] | Study type: randomized, controlled, single-blinded Patients: N = 201; 1–18 yr Procedure: gastroscopy, colonoscopy Drugs: ketamine (0.75 mg/kg with additions of 0.25 mg/kg up max. to 1.5 mg/kg; repeated after 10–15 min at 0.5 mg/kg as needed) Intervention: midazolam (0.1 mg/kg; max 2.5 mg; repeated after 30–60 min at 0.05 mg/kg as needed) vs no premedication Intended sedation level: deep sedation Additional interventions: none Administered by: dedicated nurse under supervision of endoscopist Outcome measures: Adverse events: respiration rate, HR, BP, SaO2 (any drop below 92%), adverse reactions Effectiveness: ease of procedure, total ketamine consumption | Adverse events: mild self-limited laryngospasm in 3%, high rate of desaturations (approx. in 40%), vomiting in 17%, regardless of study group; more emergence reactions in ketamine group during recovery (10 vs 2) Effectiveness: high rate of sedation adequacy | Study was not double-blinded | Ketamine starting dose should be at least 1 mg/kg; more emergence reactions without midazolam premedication; same frequency of other adverse reactions |
Miqdady et al[5] | Study type: retrospective cohort study Patients: N = 301; 1 (more than 10 kg) –18 yr; ASA I, II Procedure: upper, lower or combined GI endoscopy Drugs: atropine (0.01–0.02 mg/kg per minute. 0.1 mg, max. 0.4 mg); midazolam (0.05–0.2 mg/kg); ketamine (0.5–1 mg/kg) Intended sedation level: deep sedation Additional interventions: none Administered by: endoscopist Outcome measures: Adverse events: respiration rate, HR, BP, SaO2 (any drop below 94%), side effects Effectiveness: the adequacy of sedation | Adverse events: desaturation in 12.3%, in 1.2% disruption of examination due to persistent desaturation; in 1.2% respiratory distress after examination Effectiveness: effective and uneventful sedation in 79.4% | Retrospective study | Midazolam and ketamine sedation is safe and effective for diagnostic GI endoscopies in children older than 1 yr weighting more than 10 kg without comorbidities |
Motamed et al[6] | Study type: prospective, randomised, double-blinded Patients: N = 150; 1–18 yr; ASA I, II Procedure: upper GI endoscopy Drugs: main sedative: midazolam (0.1 mg/kg; if needed repeated doses up to 5 mg or 0.3 mg/kg); premedication 45 min before the procedure with oral placebo (normal saline), oral ketamin (5 mg/kg), or oral fentanyl (2 μg/kg) Additional interventions: spray of lidocaine 10%; additional oxygen trough nasal cannula at 2 L/min Administered by: registered nurse supervised by anaesthesiologist Outcome measures: Adverse events: respiration rate, HR (decrease by 30% from baseline), BP (decrease or increase by 20%), SaO2 (any drop below 90%) Effectiveness: total midazolam dose, modified Ramsey sedation score, procedure time, discharge time, ease of iv catheter placement, separation from parents agitation, the adequacy of sedation | Adverse events: in total in 26% of patients (hypoxia in 7.3%, hypotension in 6.7%, dizziness in 20%, nausea in 10%, vomiting in 17.6%); mild, easily managed Effectiveness: the total recovery and procedure duration time was shorter in the ketamine-midazolam group, inadequate sedation in 10.2% in placebo-midazolam and in 8% in fentanyl-midazolam vs in 3.9% in ketamine-midazolam group; the mean administered dose of midazolam was the lowest in ketamine-midazolam group; the iv line placement and separation from parents was easier in ketamine-midazolam group; only 27.4% of patients did not remember the procedure | Sedation with oral ketamine-iv midazolam is better than placebo-midazolam or oral fentanyl-iv midazolam | |
Chiaretti et al[7] | Study type: retrospective (12 yr), multicentric Patients: N = 36516; 1 to > 10 yr; ASA I, II, III Procedure: different painful procedures Drugs: main sedative: propofol 2 mg/kg in children from 1 to 8 yr of age and 1 mg/kg in older children and in children younger than 1 yr; further doses of 0.5–1.0 mg/kg in the case of agitation or complain; premedication: atropine 0.010–0.015 mg/kg, ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) to avoid infusion pain in 2 centres (not in gastroscopy); additional oxygen trough nasal cannula at 6 L/min Intended sedation level: deep sedation Administered by: paediatrician (anaesthesiologist available in case of need) Outcome measures: mean arterial pressure, heart rate and SatO2, incidence, type and timing of adverse events (major and minor) and number of calls to the emergency team Effectiveness: total dosage of the sedative agents, level of sedation (Ramsay scale) | Adverse events: in 6 patients (0.02%) emergency team intervention (prolonged laryngospasm in 3 patients, bleeding in 1, intestinal perforation in 1, and 1 during lumbar puncture); milder adverse events: hypotension in 19 patients (0.05%), ventilation by face mask and additional oxygen in 128 patients (0.4%), laryngospasm in 78 patients (0.2%), bronchospasm in 15 patients (0.04%); minor complications more often in children who underwent gastroscopy; none of the children experienced severe side effects or prolonged hospitalisation. | Retrospective study | Propofol is safe and effective for paediatrician-administered procedural sedation in children; appropriate training for paediatricians is important |
Gül et al[8] | Study type: randomized, controlled, double-blinded Patients: N = 64; 3-14 yr; ASA I Procedure: esophagogastroduodenoscopy Drugs: main sedative: propofol 2 mg/kg; analgesic: group R: remifentanil 0.25 μg/kg, group F: fentanyl 0.5 μg/kg; additional oxygen trough nasal cannula at 4 L/min Intended sedation level: deep sedation Administered by: anesthesiologist Outcome measures: MAP, HR, RR, and SpO2 Effectiveness: ease of gastroscopy, patient’s movements during procedure, additional doses of drugs; level of sedation (Ramsay scale); duration of PACU stay | Adverse events: prolonged apnoea in 14 (43.8%) children in group R and in 11 (33.3%) children in group F; none required endotracheal intubation; Effectiveness intraoperative respiratory rate, time to eye opening, opioid consumption, and duration of recovery were significantly shorter in group R duration of PACU stay were significantly shorter in group R than in group F | Remifentanil (combined with propofol) is an efficient and as safe as fentanyl propofol combination for esophagogastroduodenoscopy in children | |
Long et al[9] | Study type: retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data Patients: N = 4904; 15-90 yr; ASA I-IV Procedure: esophagogastroduodenoscopy Drugs propofol 1-100 mg and/or midazolam 1-3 mg2 mg/kg Administered by: endoscopist Outcome measures: influence of pre-existing disease and ASA score on oxygen desaturation (SpO2) < 90% | Adverse events: hypoxemia in 245 patients (5%); risk factors: high BMI (30 kg/m2), hypertension, diabetes, gastrointestinal disease, heart disease ASA score was not predictive for hypoxemia | Retrospective study | Independent risk factors for hypoxemia were high BMI, hypertension, diabetes, gastrointestinal and heart diseases and combined gastro and colonoscopy |
Agostoni et al[10] | Study type: retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data Patients: N = 17999 (17524 in older than 12 yr, 457 in < 12 yr); 4-74 yr; ASA I-IV Procedure: esophagogastroduodenoscopy and in some cases different procedures (mucosectomy, hemostatic clip, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, …) Drugs: propofol induction (in children 1-2 mg/kg BW) then in continous infusion Intended sedation level: deep sedation Administered by: anesthesiologist Outcome measures: adverse events (hypotension, desaturation, bradycardia, hypertension, arrhythmia, aspiration, respiratory depression, vomiting, cardiac arrest, respiratory arrest, angina, hypoglycemia, and/or allergic reaction) | Adverse events: rare in children (2.6%) and in adults (4.5%), in children were more often only bradycardia (2.1%) and hypotension (0.44%) 3 adult patients died; no death case in children | Retrospective analysis, single centre data | Deep sedation with intravenous propofol for endoscopic procedures is safe in children and adults |
OrganisationRef. | Title | Year of publication |
American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases; American College of Gastroenterology; American Gastroenterological Association Institute; American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; Society for Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates Vargo et al[16] | Multisociety sedation curriculum for GI endoscopy | 2012 |
Task Force Members. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates, and the European Society of Anaesthesiology Dumonceau et al[17] | Guideline: Non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol for GI endoscopy | 2010 |
Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons Heneghan et al[18] | Surgeons. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons guidelines for office endoscopic services | 2009 |
Standards of Practice Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Lichtenstein et al[19] | Sedation and anesthesia in GI endoscopy | 2008 |
Training Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Vargo et al[20] | Training in patient monitoring and sedation and analgesia | 2007 |
Working Group on Endoscopy, Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (OGGH) Schreiber[21] | Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (OGGH)-guidelines on sedation and monitoring during GI endoscopy | 2007 |
Training Committee American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy[22] | Training guideline for use of propofol in gastrointestinal endoscopy | 2004 |
American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Standards of Practice Committee Waring et al[23] | Guidelines for conscious sedation and monitoring during GI endoscopy | 2003 |
Standards Practice Committe American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Faigel et al[24] | Guidelines for the use of deep sedation and anesthesia for GI endoscopy | 2002 |
OrganisationRef. | Title | Year ofpublication |
Green et al[28] | Clinical practice guideline for emergency department ketamine dissociative sedation: 2011 update | 2011 |
National Clinical Guideline Centre (United Kingdom)[26] | Sedation in children and young people: Sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in children and young people | 2010 |
American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry Clinical Affairs Committee-Sedation and General Anesthesia Subcommittee; American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry Council on Clinical Affairs[29] | Guideline on use of anesthesia personnel in the administration of office-based sedation/general anesthesia to the pediatric dental patient | 2009 |
American Academy on Pediatrics; American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry[30] | Guideline for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures | 2009 |
American Academy of Pediatrics; American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Coté et al[25] | Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: an update | 2006 |
American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry Clinical Affairs Committee-Sedation and General Anesthesia Subcommittee; American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry Council on Clinical Affairs[31] | Guideline on use of anesthesia care providers in the administration of in-office deep sedation/general anesthesia to the pediatric dental patient | 2005 |
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry | Guideline on the elective use of minimal, moderate, and deep sedation and general anesthesia for pediatric dental patients | 2005 |
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Committee on Sedation and Anesthesia[15] | ||
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry[32] | Clinical guideline on the elective use of minimal, moderate, and deep sedation and general anesthesia for pediatric dental patients | 2004 |
Green et al[27,28] | Clinical practice guideline for emergency department ketamine dissociative sedation in children | 2004 |
UK National Clinical Guidelines in Pediatric Dentistry Hosey[33] | UK National Clinical Guidelines in Paediatric Dentistry. Managing anxious children: the use of conscious sedation in paediatric dentistry | 2002 |
Preparation of the patient | Comments | |
Planning of the investigation /procedure | Understanding of the investigation | Explanation of the examination: Aims of investigation Possible risks |
Informed consent | Signed by parents and/or the child (depending on the age and legislation) | |
Presedation assessment | Co-morbidity ASA score (Table 5) Medicines Bleeding tendency Previous undesirable effects of sedation/anesthesia Specific contraindications for the planned sedation Previous complications of investigations Allergies The need for antibiotic prophylaxis Laboratory investigation/consultation before the investigation/procedure (e.g., tests of hemostasis in case of bleeding tendency) Additional important data | |
Preparation | Exact instructions (fasting time, colon cleansing etc.) | |
On the day of examination | Focused history: Current health state Infectious diseases Epidemiologic situation Fasting Allergy Specific contraindications for the planned sedation | |
Physical examination | Complete physical examination with the focus on respiratory and cardiovascular system | |
Measurement of vital signs | Arterial blood pressure Heart rate Arterial oxygen saturation | |
Laboratory investigations | If needed |
Class | Description | Suitability for sedation |
Class I | A normally healthy patient | Excellent |
Class II | A patient with mild systemic disease (e.g., controlled asthma) | Generally good |
Class III | A patient with severe systemic disease (e.g., a child who is actively wheezing) | Intermediate to poor |
Class IV | A patient with severe systemic disease that is a constant | Poor |
threat to life (e.g., a child with status asthmaticus) | ||
Class V | A moribund patient who is not expected to survive without the operation (e.g., a patient with severe cardiomyopathy requiring heart transplantation | Extremely poor |
Generic name | Mechanism(s) of action | Main undesirable effects | Comments | Ref. |
Sedatives | ||||
Fentanyl | Opioid receptors agonist; analgesia and sedation | Respiratory depression, hypotension | Due to analgesic effect only it should be combined with benzodiazepine; antagonist naloxone | [38-40] |
Ketamine | Binds to the NmethylDaspartate (NMDA) receptors; anesthesia, analgesia, amnesia, sedation, immobilisation | Laryngospasm, hypertension, tachycardia, hypersalivation, vomiting, random movements, increase in intraocular pressure, emergence phenomena (floating sensations, vivid dreams, blurred vision, hallucinations, and delirium) | Beneficial respiratory properties and analgesic potency S(+) isomer has less adverse effects | [40-42] |
Meperidine | Opioid receptors agonist; analgesia and sedation | Respiratory depression, pruritus, vomiting | Interaction with monoamine oxidase inhibitors | [38,43,44] [38-40] |
Midazolam | GABA receptor agonist; anterograde amnesia, anxiolysis, sedation, hypnosis | Respiratory depression, hypotension, paradoxical agitation | Without analgesic effect; should be combined with analgesic (usually opioids) | |
Concomitant use with opioid increases the risk of respiratory depression antagonist flumazenil | ||||
Nitrous oxide | Inhalation anaesthetic | Vomiting, dizziness, voice change, euphoria, laughter | The need of scavenging system Use mostly limited to anaesthesiologists | [38,40,45] |
Propofol | GABA receptor agonist; sedation, hypnosis, amnesia | Respiratory depression, apnoea, hypotension, painful injection | [38,40,46] | |
Sevoflurane | Inhalation anaesthetic | Recovery agitation, bradycardia, hypotension, cough, vomiting, seizures | The need of scavenging system Use limited to anaesthesiologists | [47-49] |
Antagonists | ||||
Flumazenil | Benzodiazepine antagonist | Nausea, vomiting | Contraindicated in benzodiazepine dependence, seizure disorder, cyclic antidepressant overdose, elevated intracranial pressure in patients, and in patients taking medicines known to lower the seizure threshold | [40] |
Naloxone | Opioid antagonist | Nausea, vomiting, tachycardia | [40] |
Medicine generic name | Route | Dose | Time to start sedation/analgesia (after iv application) | Sedation/analgesia duration | Repeating time and dose | Contraindications | Comments | Ref. |
Sedative/analgesic | ||||||||
Fentanyl | iv | 1–2 μg/kg (up to 50 μg) | 0.5 s | 20–40 min (30–60 min) | 3 min 1–1.25 μg/kg | Due to higher clearance younger children need frequent dosing | [38,40] | |
Ketamine | iv slowly over 1 min; other routes have less predictive effects and different dosing – see the discussion | 1–1.5 mg/kg | 1–5 min | 15 min | 10 min | Severe cardiovascular disease, malignant hypertension, CSF obstructive states (controversial), intraocular pressure pathology; previous psychotic illness, hyperthyroidism or thyroid medicine use; porphyria | A single enantiomer S(+); | [8,40-42] |
0.5 mg/kg | the anesthetic management of seriously ill hypovolemic patients, it may be the agent of choice for managing children and burned patients; low cost | |||||||
Meperidine | iv slowly over 1–2 min | 0.3–2 mg/kg | 3–6 min | 60–180 min | Simultaneous treatment with monoamine oxidase inhibitors | [38,43,44] | ||
Midazolam | iv slowly over 2–3 min; other routes have less predictive effects and different dosing | 0.05–0.1 mg/kg in < 5 yr (max. 0.6 mg/kg); in 6–12 yr 0.025–0.05 mg/kg (max.0.4 mg/kg); in older than 12 yr 2–2.5 mg (in total not per kg BW) | 2–3 min | 45–60 min | Repeating doses every 2–5 min until desired effect; in children 6 mo–5 yr total dose up to 0.6 mg/kg or max. 6 mg; in 6–12 yr total dose up to 0.4 mg/kg or max. 10 mg; in older than 12 yr additional boluses of 1 mg until desired sedation | Respiratory depression, hypotension | Rarely used as a sole sedative; might be used to sedate the frightened child before iv catheter placement; mostly combined with opioids; paradoxical irritation in 1%–5% of patients | [38-40] |
Nitrous oxide | Inhalation | Mostly the mixture of nitrous oxide (50%) and oxygen | 0.5–1 min | 5 min | Continuously or “on demand” | Pneumothorax, bowel obstruction, head injury, pregnancy | Its use limited to anaesthesiologists | [38,40,45] |
Propofol | iv | 2 mg/kg in infants and young children (younger than 3 yr); 1 mg/kg in children older than 3 yr | 1–2 min | 5–15 min | 1 mg/kg (infants and children up to 3 yr); 0.5 mg/kg (children older than 3 yr) to reach the desired sedation; may be continuously infused at 100 μg/kg per min and increasing the speed of infusion by 50 μg/kg per min for prolonged procedures | Egg or soy allergy | For additional medication to alleviate infusion pain see text; alfentanil but not fentanyl increases propofol blood level; in many countries the use is limited to anaesthesiologists | [38,40,46] |
Sevoflurane | Inhalation | Different concentrations according to the age | Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy, moderate to severe liver disease of unknown aetiology, history of malignant hyperthermia | Its use limited to anaesthesiologists | [47-49] | |||
Antagonists | ||||||||
Flumazenil | iv | 0.02 mg/kg (max. 1 mg) | 1–3 min | 30 min | 1 min; same dose | Chronic benzodiazepine use; ingestion of drugs that increase the risk for seizures development (e.g., cyclic antidepressants, cyclosporine, and others) | Due to its shorter duration of action than most of benzodiazepines (e.g., midazolam) repeated doses may be needed | [38,40] |
Naloxone | iv or i.m. | 0.1 mg/kg (max. 2 mg) | 2 min | 20–40 min | 2 min; same dose | Hypersensitivity only | Due to its shorter duration of action than most of opioids (e.g., fentanyl) repeated doses may be needed | [38,40] |
- Citation: Orel R, Brecelj J, Dias JA, Romano C, Barros F, Thomson M, Vandenplas Y. Review on sedation for gastrointestinal tract endoscopy in children by non-anesthesiologists. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7(9): 895-911
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v7/i9/895.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v7.i9.895