Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. May 16, 2015; 7(5): 510-517
Published online May 16, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i5.510
Table 1 Comparison of different equipment for indirect peroral cholangioscopy
CharacteristicsSpyglassPolyscope
Optics resolution6000 Pixel10000 Pixel
Working channel1.2 mm1.2 mm
Viewing angle70°70°
Outer diameter10 Fr8 Fr
Re-useableYesYes
Optical channel hermetically closeNoYes (The optical fiber doesn't need to be sterilized; this prolongs its life cycle)
Steerability4 way1 way (With locking of the bending and rotating of the tip)
Compatibility with existing endoscopy towerNo (You have to buy a complete endoscopy tower system)Yes (You can use, through adapters an existing endoscopy tower in the Hospital)
Table 2 Diagnostic and therapeutic applications for cholangioscopy
Diagnostic applicationsTherapeutic applications
Common
Uncommon
Common
Uncommon
Indeterminate biliary stricturesBiliary cyst evaluationLithotripsy for choledocholithiasisBiliary guidewire placement
Verification of bile duct stone clearanceBile duct ischemia evaluation (post-liver-transplant)Transpapillary gallbladder drainage
Staging of cholangiocarcinomaDuctal involvement in ampullary adenoma HemobiliaForeign body removal (e.g., stent)
Table 3 Results of cholangioscopic-guided biopsies in indeterminate lesions
Ref.SensitivitySpecificityNegative predictive valueAccuracy
Ramchandani et al[17]82%82%100%82%
Chen et al[18]49%98%72%75%
Draganov et al[16]76.5%100%69.2%84.6%