Multiband mucosectomy for advanced dysplastic lesions in the upper digestive tract

Table 1 Results of multiband mucosectomy procedures from different studies

Ref.	Numberandprocedures	Complete eradication	Recurrence rate	Complications	Follow-up(mo)
Soehendra et al[16]	10 MBM	90%	N/A	Stricture (SRER 70%)	N/A
Ell et al[62]	100 MBM (%N/A) Cap	99%	11%	0%	33
Peters et al[31]	40 MBM	N/A	N/A	Bleeding (6%)	N/A
Chennat et al[26]	49 MBM (4%) Cap FH	65%	2.50%	Stricture (SRER 36.7%)	23
Espinel et al[15]	8 MBM	100%	0%	Stricture (SRER 25%)	32
Moss et al[28]	75 MBM (%N/A) Cap	94%	0%	Stricture (SRER 8%)	31
Pouw et al[27]	169 MBM (%N/A) Cap FH	95.30%	1.80%	Bleeding (1.8%) Perforation (2.4%) Stricture (SRER 50%)	32
Brahmania et al[63]	22 MBM	82%	18%	Stricture (SRER 13%)	24
Pouw et al[18]	42 MBM	100%	N/A	Perforation (2%)	N/A
Alvarez Herrero et al[17]	243 MBM	91%	0%	Bleeding (3%) Stricture (SRER 48%)	3
Van Vilsteren et al[30]	25 MBM (48%) Cap FH	100%	4%	Perforation (4%) Stricture (SRER 88%)	25
Gerke et al[29]	41 MBM (76%) Cap	78%	9%	Perforation (4.9%) Stricture (SRER 44%)	25
Tomizawa et al[56]	681 MBM (18%) Cap	N/A	N/A	Bleeding (1.2%) Stricture (1%)	63

MBM: Multiband mucosectomy; Cap: Cap technique; FH: Free hand technique; N/A: No data available; SRER: Stepwise radical endoscopic resection.