Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Apr 16, 2015; 7(4): 295-307
Published online Apr 16, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i4.295
Published online Apr 16, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i4.295
Table 1 Clinico-epidemiologic characteristics of Dieulafoy lesion
Anatomy |
Dilated, aberrant, submucosal artery eroding overlying gastrointestinal mucosa in absence of either underlying ulcer or local aneurysm |
Location |
70% of ulcers in stomach |
In stomach most commonly located within 6 cm of gastroesophageal junction along lesser curve |
Can occur moderately commonly in esophagus or duodenum, occasionally in jejunum or ileum, and rarely in colon |
Epidemiology |
Generally presents clinically in older age, but can occur at any age |
Male:female ratio = 2:1 |
No known epidemiologic risk factors or clinically associated diseases |
Clinical presentation |
Typically presents with overt GI bleeding, often with hematemesis or melena, or both |
Bleeding typically severe |
No prodromal symptoms |
Typically bleeding is painless |
Frequent presentation with signs or laboratory tests of hemodynamic instability, including: tachycardia, hypotension, orthostasis, and acute prerenal azotemia |
Frequently requires transfusion of multiple units of packed erythrocytes |
Frequent recurrent bleeding if undetected or not treated at initial endoscopy |
Table 2 Diagnosis of Dieulafoy’s lesion
EGD |
Small, relatively inconspicuous pigmented protuberance with minimal surrounding erosion and no ulceration |
Lesion often actively bleeding or oozing at EGD |
Gastric lesions most commonly within 6 cm of GE junction along lesser curve |
Initial EGD may be nondiagnostic in up to 30% of cases due to relatively small lesion size |
Avoid endoscopic biopsies of lesion |
Colonoscopy or enteroscopy |
May be useful to diagnose colonic or jejunoileal lesions, respectively, if EGD was negative in setting of severe, acute GI bleeding |
Angiography |
May be helpful in setting of rectal bleeding after negative EGD and colonoscopy |
Table 3 Therapy for Dieulafoy’s lesion
Pre-endoscopic therapy |
Secure IV access using multiple, large bore catheters |
Volume resuscitation initially using crystalloid followed by transfusions of packed erythrocytes as dictated by serial hematocrit determinations and tempo of bleeding |
Endoscopic therapies |
Mechanical therapies |
Hemoclips |
Band ligation |
Injection therapies |
Epinephrine injection |
Absolute alcohol |
Ablative therapies |
Heater probe |
Electrocoagulation: Bicap, gold probe, etc., |
APC (argon plasma coagulation) |
Combination therapies |
Usually epinephrine injection therapy followed by: |
Heater probe |
Hemoclip |
Or APC |
Interventional angiography |
Embolization |
Pledgelets |
Metal coils |
Balloon occlusion |
Surgery |
Mostly salvage therapy after failure of other interventional therapies |
Table 4 Efficacy of endoscopic mechanical monotherapies for bleeding Dieulafoy’s lesions
Endoscopic procedure(No. of patients) | Lesion location | Type of study | Follow-up | Outcome | Ref. |
Hemoclips | |||||
EGD (34) | Stomach/duodenum | Prospective | 54 mo | initial hemostasis 32/34 pts (94%), 3 pts (9%) rebled | [75] |
EGD (18) | Stomach | Retrospective | 36 mo | 1 (5%) rebled | [77] |
EGD (16) | Stomach/duodenum | Prospective, randomized | 1 wk | 1 (6%) rebled | [78] |
Mostly EGD (14) | Mostly stomach/duodenum | Retrospective | Hospitalization | No rebleeding | [36] |
EGD (8) Colonoscopy (1) | Stomach Rectum | Retrospective | 19 mo | 1 (12%) rebled | [73] |
EGD (6) | Stomach/duodenum | Retrospective | 47 mo | 1 (17%) rebled, unclear if single/combination therapy | [79] |
Colonoscopy (3) | Rectum | Retrospective | 5 mo | No rebleeding | [80] |
Double balloon enteroscopy (3) | Jejunum | Retrospective, multicenter | 14.5 mo | 1 (33%) rebled 69 d after hemoclip | [17] |
Single balloon enteroscopy (2) | Ileum | Retrospective | 2 mo | No rebleeding | [18] |
Colonoscopy (1) | Colon | Case report | 6 mo | No rebleeding | [33] |
Band ligation | |||||
EGD (24) | Stomach 23 Jejunum 1 | Retrospective | 18 mo | 1 (4%) hemostasis failure, 1 (4%) rebled (jejunum) | [81] |
EGD (13) | Stomach Esophagus | Prospective | 24 wk | No rebleeding | [82] |
EGD (13) | Stomach/duodenum | Retrospective | 30 d | No rebleeding | [83] |
EGD (10) | Stomach | Prospective | 30 d | No rebleeding | [76] |
EGD (7) | Stomach | Retrospective | 8 mo | No rebleeding | [84] |
EGD (3) | Upper GI | Retrospective | 19 mo | No rebleeding | [73] |
“Mostly” EGD (2) | Stomach | Retrospective | Hospitalization | No rebleeding | [75] |
EGD (1) | Stomach | Retrospective | 2 d | No rebleeding | [35] |
Colonoscopy (4) | Rectum | Retrospective | 2-5 d | 2 (50%) rebled | [85] |
Colonoscopy (3) | Rectum | Retrospective | 5 mo | No rebleeding | [80] |
Table 5 Efficacy of endoscopic injection monotherapy for bleeding Dieulafoy’s lesions
Endoscopic procedure(No. of patients) | Lesion location | Type of study | Follow-up | Outcome | Ref. |
Epinephrine injection | |||||
EGD (16) | Stomach/duodenum | Prospective | 1 wk | 2 (12%) hemostasis failure, 5 (31%) rebled | [78] |
EGD (11) Colonoscopy (1) | Stomach Rectum | Retrospective | 22 mo | 3 (27%) hemostasis failure, 4 (36%) rebled | [73] |
EGD (11) | Stomach/duodenum | Retrospective | 18 mo | 3 (27%) hemostasis failure, 2 (18%) rebled | [88] |
“Mostly” EGD (8) | Mostly stomach/duodenum | Retrospective | Hospitalization | No rebleeding | [36] |
EGD (8) | Stomach | Prospective | 30 d | 6 (75%) rebled | [76] |
EGD (6) | Stomach | Retrospective | 60 d | 2 (33%) hemostasis failure | [40] |
EGD (3) Colonoscopy (1) | Stomach/duodenum cecum (1) | Retrospective | 14 mo | No rebleeding | [35] |
EGD (3) | Stomach | Retrospective | 32 mo | 2 (66%) rebled | [72] |
Absolute ethanol injection | |||||
EGD (12) | Stomach/duodenum | Retrospective | 69 mo | 1 (8%) hemostasis failure, no rebleeding | [89] |
Ethanolamine injection | |||||
EGD (1) | Stomach | Retrospective | 8 mo | Rebled | [72] |
Table 6 Effectiveness of endoscopic ablation monotherapies for bleeding Dieulafoy’s lesions
Endoscopic procedure(No. of patients) | Lesion location | Type of study | Follow-up | Outcome | Ref. |
Heater probe coagulation | |||||
EGD (6) | Stomach/duodenum | Retrospective | 14 mo (2/3 of pts) | No rebleeding | [35] |
EGD (6) | Stomach | Retrospective | 36 mo | 2 (33%) rebled | [77] |
Mostly EGD (5) | Mostly stomach/duodenum | Retrospective | Hospitalization | No rebleeding | [36] |
EGD (1) | Stomach | Retrospective | 40 mo | No rebleeding | [72] |
Argon plasma coagulation | |||||
Double balloon enteroscopy (3) | Jejunum-2, Ileum-1 | Retrospective /multicenter | 14 mo | 1 (33%) rebled | [17] |
EGD (3) | Stomach | Retrospective | 2 mo | No rebleeding | [40] |
EGD (1) | Likely upper GI | Retrospective | Hospitalization | No rebleeding | [36] |
Multipolar electrocoagulation | |||||
EGD (14) | Stomach | Retrospective | 24 mo | 1 (7%) hemostasis failure, 1 rebled | [82] |
EGD (1) | Likely upper GI | Retrospective | Hospitalization | Rebled | [36] |
Table 7 Effectiveness of various combination endoscopic therapies for bleeding Dieulafoy’s lesions
Endoscopic therapies (No. of patients) | Endoscopy: lesion location | Type of study | Mean length of follow-up | Study outcome | Ref. |
Epinephrine and polidocanol (27) | EGD: stomach/duodenum | Retrospective | 28 mo | 5 (18%) rebled | [71] |
Epi and heater probe (28) | EGD: stomach/duodenum | Retrospective | 14 mo (2/3 of patients) | 2 (7%) rebled | [35] |
Epi and heater probe (10) | EGD: stomach/duodenum | Retrospective | 18 mo | No rebleeding | [88] |
Epi and heater probe (9) | “Mostly” EGD; Mostly stomach/duodenum | Retrospective | Hospitalization | 1 (11%) rebled | [36] |
Epi and heater probe (8) | EGD: stomach/duodenum | Retrospective | 32 mo | No rebleeding | [72] |
Epi and heater probe (6) | EGD | Retrospective | 2 mo | No rebleeding | [40] |
Epi and heater probe (2) | Colonoscopy | Retrospective | 1 and 7 mo | No rebleeding | [59] |
Epi and hemoclip and ethanol injection (21) | EGD: stomach/duodenum | Retrospective | 47 mo | 1 (4%) rebled | [79] |
Epi and hemoclip (19) | EGD: Stomach | Retrospective | 47 mo | 1 (5%) rebled | [79] |
Epi and hemoclip (16) | “Mostly” EGD: mostly stomach/ duodenum | Retrospective | During hospitalization | 1 (6%) rebled | [36] |
Epi and hemoclip (3) | EGD: Stomach | Retrospective | 2 mo | No rebleeding | [40] |
Epi and multipolar electrocoagulation (5) | “Mostly” EGD: Mostly stomach/duodenum | Retrospective | During hospitalization | 1 (20%) rebled | [36] |
Epi and banding (1) | EGD: stomach | Retrospective | During hospitalization | No rebleeding | [36] |
Epi and ethanol (52) | EGD: Stomach/ duodenum | Retrospective | 69 mo | Approximately 9% hemostasis failure, 10 (20%) rebled | [89] |
Epi and ethanol (11) | EGD: stomach duodenum | Retrospective | 47 mo | 1 rebled | [79] |
Epi and ethanolamine (5) | EGD: stomach/duodenum | Retrospective | 32 mo | 2 (40%) rebled | [72] |
Injection therapy and clip (2) | Double balloon enteroscopy: jejunum | Retrospective, multicenter | 14 mo | No rebleeding | [17] |
Injection therapy and APC (1) | Double balloon enteroscopy: jejunum | Retrospective, multicenter | 14 mo | Rebled after 9 d | [17] |
Injection and heater probe and clips (1) | Colonoscopy: colon | Case report | NA | No rebleeding | [90] |
- Citation: Nojkov B, Cappell MS. Gastrointestinal bleeding from Dieulafoy’s lesion: Clinical presentation, endoscopic findings, and endoscopic therapy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7(4): 295-307
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v7/i4/295.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v7.i4.295