Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Oct 10, 2015; 7(14): 1142-1149
Published online Oct 10, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i14.1142
Published online Oct 10, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i14.1142
Table 1 Summary of the 20 patients with submucosal tumors who underwent endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy and mucosal cutting biopsy
Age, mean ± SD (yr) | 61.8 ± 12.5 |
Male: Female | 10:10 |
Tumor location (upper/middle/lower) | 11/8/1 |
Tumor size ± SD (range) (mm) | 23.6 ± 11.5 (10-57) |
≤ 20 mm : > 20 mm | 7:13 |
Growth pattern | |
Intraluminal | 16 |
Extraluminal | 4 |
Histological diagnosis | |
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor | 7 |
Leiomyoma | 6 |
Schwannoma | 2 |
Aberrant pancreas | 2 |
Glomus tumor | 1 |
Metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma | 1 |
Not diagnosed | 1 |
Table 2 Diagnostic yields obtained with endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy and mucosal cutting biopsy
EUS-FNAB | P value | MCB | P value | |||||||
Diagnosed (%)(n = 13) | Not diagnosed (%)(n = 7) | Diagnosed (%)(n = 12) | Not diagnosed (%)(n = 8) | |||||||
Histological diagnosis | 13 (65.0) | 12 (60.0) | > 0.99 | |||||||
Location 1 | ||||||||||
Upper | 7 | (63.6) | 4 | (36.4) | 0.33 | 8 | (72.7) | 3 | (27.3) | 0.28 |
Middle | 6 | (75.0) | 2 | (25.0) | 4 | (50.0) | 4 | (50.0) | ||
Lower | 0 | (0) | 1 | (100) | 0 | (0) | 1 | (100) | ||
Location 2 | ||||||||||
Lesser curvature | 4 | (66.7) | 2 | (33.3) | 0.81 | 3 | (50.0) | 3 | (50.0) | 0.27 |
Greater curvature | 2 | (50.0) | 2 | (50.0) | 1 | (25.0) | 3 | (75.0) | ||
Anterior wall | 4 | (80.0) | 1 | (20.0) | 4 | (80.0) | 1 | (20.0) | ||
Posterior wall | 3 | (60.0) | 2 | (40.0) | 4 | (80.0) | 1 | (20.0) | ||
Tumor size | ||||||||||
≤ 20 mm | 7 | (58.3)a | 5 | (41.7) | 0.641 | 9 | (75.0)a | 3 | (25.0) | 0.171 |
> 20 mm | 6 | (75.0)c | 2 | (25.0) | 3 | (37.5)c | 5 | (62.5) | ||
Growth pattern | ||||||||||
Intraluminal | 9 | (56.3)e | 7 | (43.8) | 0.101 | 12 | (75.0)e | 4 | (25.0) | 0.011 |
Extraluminal | 4 | (100)b | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0)b | 4 | (100) | ||
Median number of samples to the diagnosis (IQR) | 1.0 | (1.0, 1.0) | 1.0 | (1.0, 1.75) | ||||||
Median number of samples (IQR) | 3.0 | (2.5, 3.5) | 3.0 | (3.0, 3.0) | 0.93 | 5.0 | (3.0, 6.0) | 2.5 | (1.0, 5.75) | 0.17 |
- Citation: Ikehara H, Li Z, Watari J, Taki M, Ogawa T, Yamasaki T, Kondo T, Toyoshima F, Kono T, Tozawa K, Ohda Y, Tomita T, Oshima T, Fukui H, Matsuda I, Hirota S, Miwa H. Histological diagnosis of gastric submucosal tumors: A pilot study of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy vs mucosal cutting biopsy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7(14): 1142-1149
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v7/i14/1142.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v7.i14.1142