Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 25, 2015; 7(13): 1103-1106
Published online Sep 25, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i13.1103
Published online Sep 25, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i13.1103
Indication | Number |
Per rectal bleeding | 26 |
Polyp follow up | 17 |
Cancer follow up | 14 |
Diverticulitis | 9 |
Altered bowel habit | 9 |
Abnormal imaging | 8 |
Faecal occult blood test positive | 6 |
Fistula investigation | 3 |
Family history | 2 |
Anaemia | 2 |
Iron deficiency | 2 |
Volvulus | 1 |
Rectal prolapse | 1 |
Reviewer | Caecum | Appendiceal orifice | Triradiate fold | ||
1 | 99 | 76 | 77% | 13 | 17% |
2 | 95 | 79 | 83% | 17 | 22% |
3 | 96 | 76 | 79% | 13 | 17% |
4 | 93 | 89 | 96% | 18 | 20% |
5 | 100 | 89 | 89% | 11 | 12% |
6 | 97 | 73 | 75% | 13 | 18% |
Average | 97 | 80 | 83% | 14 | 18% |
- Citation: Finlayson A, Chandra R, Hastie IA, Jones IT, Shedda S, Hong MKY, Yen A, Hayes IP. Triradiate caecal fold: Is it a useful landmark for caecal intubation in colonoscopy? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7(13): 1103-1106
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v7/i13/1103.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v7.i13.1103