Widjaja D, Bhandari M, Loveday-Laghi V, Glandt M, Balar B. Withdrawal time in excellent or very poor bowel preparation qualities. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 6(5): 186-192 [PMID: 24891931 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i5.186]
Corresponding Author of This Article
David Widjaja, MD, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Bronx Lebanon Hospital Center, 1650 Selwyn Ave, 10th Floor, Bronx, NY 10457, United States. medicine.nyc@gmail.com
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastrointest Endosc. May 16, 2014; 6(5): 186-192 Published online May 16, 2014. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i5.186
Table 1 Criteria used to classify bowel preparation quality
Bowel preparation quality
Criteria
Excellent
Mucosal detail clearly visible without washing (suctioning of liquid allowed
Good
Minimal turbid fluid in colonic segments and entire mucosa well seen after cleaning
Fair
There is minor residual material in the colonic segments. Necessary to suction liquid to adequately view the colonic segments
Poor
Necessary to wash and suction to obtain a reasonable view. Portion of mucosa in colonic segments seen after cleaning but up to 15% of the mucosa not seen because of retained material
Unsatisfactory
Solid stool not cleared with washing and suctioning. More than 15% of the mucosa not seen
Table 2 Patient characteristics based on bowel preparation quality n (%)
Characteristics
Quality of bowel preparation
Excellent (n = 108)
Good (n = 4051)
Fair (n = 2889)
Poor (n = 1045)
Unsatisfactory (n = 238)
Mean age ± SD, yr
58 ± 7.6
59 ± 7.6
59 ± 7.9
60 ± 7.7
59 ± 8.3
Women
65 (60)
2481 (61)
1596 (55)
537 (51)
117 (49)
Race
Asian
1 (1)
32 (1)
16 (1)
4 (0)
0 (0)
White
1 (1)
47 (1)
34 (1)
15 (1)
5 (2)
Black
25 (23)
875 (22)
697 (24)
280 (27)
82 (35)
Hispanic
81 (75)
3097 (77)
2142 (74)
746 (71)
151 (63)
Morning procedure
45 (42)
1877 (46)
1212 (42)
428 (41)
78 (33)
Table 3 Withdrawal time and polyp detection based on bowel preparation quality n (%)
Quality of bowel preparation
P-value
Excellent (n = 108)
Good (n = 4051)
Fair (n = 2889)
Poor (n = 1045)
Unsatisfactory (n = 238)
Mean duration of colonoscope withdrawal ± SD, min
10 ± 5.5
12 ± 5.3
13 ± 5.9
12 ± 5.2
11 ± 9.4
< 0.001
No. of colonic segments with polyps
< 0.001
0
85 (77)
2707 (67)
1799 (62)
703 (67)
181 (76)
1
17 (16)
769 (19)
581 (20)
223 (21)
38 (16)
2
3 (3)
375 (9)
305 (11)
74 (7)
13 (6)
3
1 (1)
136 (3)
145 (5)
31 (3)
6 (3)
4
2 (2)
43 (1)
38 (1)
11 (1)
0 (0)
5
0 (0)
16 (0)
18 (1)
3 (0)
0 (0)
6
0 (0)
2 (0)
3 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
7
0 (0)
2 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
8
0 (0)
1 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
Total No. of colonic polyps
< 0.001
0
85 (77)
2707 (67)
1799 (62)
703 (67)
181 (76)
1
13 (12)
581 (14)
446 (15)
42 (4)
30 (13)
2
2 (2)
231 (6)
164 (6)
60 (6)
8 (3)
3
4 (4)
256 (6)
195 (7)
37 (4)
10 (4)
4
2 (2)
152 (4)
155 (5)
22 (2)
5 (2)
5
1 (1)
73 (2)
90 (3)
6 (1)
4 (2)
> 5
1 (1)
51 (1)
30 (1)
2 (0)
0 (0)
Table 4 Predictors of higher number of colonic segments with polyps and total number of colonic polyps during screening colonoscopy
Citation: Widjaja D, Bhandari M, Loveday-Laghi V, Glandt M, Balar B. Withdrawal time in excellent or very poor bowel preparation qualities. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 6(5): 186-192