Friedel D, Stavropoulos S, Iqbal S, Cappell MS. Gastrointestinal endoscopy in the pregnant woman. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 6(5): 156-167 [PMID: 24891928 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i5.156]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Mitchell S Cappell, MD, PhD, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, William Beaumont Hospital, 3535 West Thirteen Mile Road, Royal Oak, MI 48073, United States. mscappell@yahoo.com
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Review
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastrointest Endosc. May 16, 2014; 6(5): 156-167 Published online May 16, 2014. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i5.156
Table 1 Unique features of endoscopy during pregnancy
1 Two or more patients at risk
2 Medications and anesthesia usually used may be contraindicated due to fetal risks
3 Patient position an issue in terms of placental blood flow
4 Greater concerns for blood pressure fluctuations due to concerns about placental perfusion
5 Greater concern for aspiration in later pregnancy
6 Disease states that may be exacerbated by pregnancy (GERD) or specific to pregnancy (hyperemesis gravidarum, gestational diabetes, third trimester liver syndromes-HELLP syndrome, etc.)
7 Deferral of procedure to more optimal times (e.g., defer procedure from second trimester to postpartum, with possible expedited delivery)
8 Duration of procedure prime concern
9 Obstetric input and monitoring usually necessary
10 Screening for malignancy and Barrett’s esophagus less of a concern
11 Avoidance of radiation-based and interventional ancillary procedures (computed tomography imaging, angiography)
12 Monopolar electrocautery (e.g., with sphincterotomy) may harm fetus
Table 2 Fetal risks of endoscopic or peri-endoscopic medications used during pregnancy1
Dysphagia > 1-2 wk, especially with diminished intake or weight loss
Odynophagia > 1-2 wk
Gross gastrointestinal hemorrhage with hematemesis and/or melena, especially if patient becomes hypotensive, requires blood products, or has a significant acute hemoglobin decline
GI hemorrhage with strong clinical suspicion of varices
Suggestion of malignancy on radiologic imaging studies (e.g., MRI)
Possible gastric outlet obstruction (e.g., from peptic ulcer disease)
Endoscopic therapy for continued UGI bleeding
Balloon dilatation of symptomatic UGI stricture (e.g., endoscopic therapy for reflux stricture)
Moderate indications
Recurrent nausea and emesis (including possible hyperemesis gravidarum) if patient > 16-18 wk pregnant and concern exists for peptic ulcer disease with inadequate patient response to > 2 wk of conservative therapy, including PPI
Strong need for endoscopic placement of enteric tube (e.g., for hyperemesis or severe, prolonged, acute pancreatitis)
Nausea and emesis after UGI surgery (including bariatric surgery) with concern for postsurgical stricture
Weak indications
Hyperemesis gravidarum during first trimester
Self-limited nausea, emesis or abdominal pain
GERD symptoms, excluding dysphagia not responsive to empiric PPI therapy
Routine endoscopic surveillance for higher risk patients (e.g., EGD for personal history of familial polyposis coli)-can be deferred until postpartum
Iron deficiency anemia-should generally be deferred until postpartum
Table 4 Concerns about performance of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography during pregnancy
1 The procedure is technically challenging
2 The patient is normally placed in prone position for ERCP with consequently decreased placental perfusion for the significant duration of the procedure
3 The patient requires considerable anesthetic medications during ERCP due to discomfort during this particularly prolonged procedure
4 Patients often have preexisting pain and significant acute disease, such as gallstone pancreatitis or cholangitis
5 Fluoroscopy is usually required during ERCP with consequent fetal radiation exposure
6 Complications are more common in ERCP than in other endoscopic procedures and can potentially be severe (e.g., pancreatitis, cholangitis, hemorrhage)
7 Sphincterotomy entails monopolar electrocautery with current possibly traversing the fetus
8 Endoscopic sphincterotomy entails risks of postsphincterotomy bleeding or perforation
9 Repeat procedures may be required, such as ERCP for retained biliary stones or stent malfunction and cholecystectomy for gallstones
Table 5 Recommendations for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography during pregnancy1
1 Weigh conservative management and/or deferral. Radiation early in gestation is a particular concern. Second trimester may be optimal time
2 Consult with obstetrician
3 Consult with radiation physicist if feasible to calculate appropriate dosimetry
4 Obtain MRCP if useful and available
5 Employ experienced ERCP physician
6 Endoscopic ultrasound may obviate ERCP (if CBD gallstones are not extremely likely)
7 Shield fetus/Employ unit with highly collimated beam/Avoid continuous radiation