Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Feb 16, 2013; 5(2): 39-46
Published online Feb 16, 2013. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i2.39
Published online Feb 16, 2013. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i2.39
Agent | Dosing | Recommendation | Level of evidence |
PEG | 240 mL every 10 min until rectal output is clear or total of 4 L | Faster, more effective, better-tolerated compared to dietary restriction with cathartics, gut lavage, or mannitol | Grade IA |
Sulfate-free PEG | 240 mL every 10 min until rectal output is clear or total of 4 L | Better tasting, comparable to PEG in effectiveness and safety, acceptable alternative to PEG | Grade IIB |
Low-volume PEG/PEG-3350 and bisacodyl | 4 bisacodyl delayed-release tablets at noon, after bowel movement or 6 h, 240 mL every 10 min until 2 L is consumed | Equally effective to standard 4-L PEG, better tolerated, acceptable alternative to 4-L PEG | Grade IA |
Aqueous sodium phosphate | Two doses of 30 to 45 mL sodium phosphate with 8 oz of liquid 10-12 h apart | Equal alternative to PEG except for pediatric and elderly patients, bowel obstruction, renal failure, congestive heart and liver failure | Grade IA |
Sodium phosphate tablets | 20 tablets on the evening before the procedure, 12-20 tablets 3-5 h before the procedure | Improved taste and palatability compared to aqueous sodium phosphate, but no improvement in patient tolerance | Grade IA |
Patient-related factors | Procedure-related factors |
Age > 65 yr | |
Male gender | Adherence to bowel preparation instructions |
Co-morbidity | Timing of purgative administration |
Diabetes | |
Stroke disease | |
Inpatient status | |
Low socioeconomic status | Appointment waiting times |
- Citation: Romero RV, Mahadeva S. Factors influencing quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 5(2): 39-46
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v5/i2/39.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v5.i2.39