Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Feb 16, 2025; 17(2): 99906
Published online Feb 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i2.99906
Table 1 The characteristics of 128 lesions with rectal neuroendocrine tumors, n (%)
VariablesTotal (n = 128)
Matched set (n = 58)
ESD (n = 84)
TEM (n = 44)
P value
ESD (n = 29)
TEM (n = 29)
P value
Lesion size, mm, median (IQR)8.0 (5.5-10.0)8.0 (5.0-10.0)0.7165.0 (5.0-10.0)5.0 (5.0-10.0)1.000
Age, year, mean ± SD44.7 ± 13.545.3 ± 12.20.49144.8 ± 14.741.9 ± 9.90.293
Follow-up time, month, median (IQR)27.0 (15.0-45.0)26.5 (16.0-38.0)0.93423.0 (12.0-34.0)24.0 (16.0-32.0)0.828
Male45 (60.0)30 (68.2)0.22115 (51.7)21 (72.4)0.104
Location
    Anus ≤ 5 cm32 (38.1)23 (52.3)0.12413 (44.8)14 (48.3)0.792
    Anus > 5 cm52 (61.9)21 (47.7)16 (55.2)15 (51.7)
Histological grade
    G175 (89.3)29 (65.9)0.00126 (89.7)26 (89.7)1.000
    G29 (10.7)15 (34.1)3 (10.3)3 (10.3)
Invasion depth
    Mucosa6 (7.1)2 (4.5)0.7142 (6.9)1 (3.4)1.000
    Submucosa78 (92.9)42 (95.5)27 (93.1)28 (96.6)
Vascular invasion1 (1.2)0 (0.0)1.0000 (0.0)0 (0.0)/
Perineural invasion0 (0.0)1 (2.3)0.3440 (0.0)0 (0.0)/
Table 2 Outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection and transanal endoscopic microsurgery groups, n (%)
VariablesTotal (n = 128)
Matched set (n = 58)
ESD (n = 84)
TEM (n = 44)
P value
ESD (n = 29)
TEM (n = 29)
P value
Hospital day, day, median (IQR)6.0 (5.0-7.0)9.0 (7.0-12.0)< 0.0015.5 (4.5-6.0)10.0 (7.0-12.0)< 0.001
Cost, kilo-CNY, median (IQR)11.2 (9.6-12.6)21.3 (17.4-26.7)< 0.00111.6 (9.8-12.6)20.9 (17.0-25.1)< 0.001
Anesthesia type
    Awake48 (57.1)0 (0.0)< 0.00117 (58.6)0 (0.0)< 0.001
    Venous sedation36 (42.9)0 (0.0)12 (41.4)0 (0.0)
    Tracheal intubation0 (0.0)44 (100.0)0 (0.0)29 (100.0)
Adverse event3 (3.6)2 (4.5)1.0000 (0.0)2 (6.9)0.491
En bloc resection84 (100.0)44 (100.0)/29 (100.0)29 (100.0)/
R0 resection73 (86.9)43 (97.7)0.05724 (82.8)28 (96.6)0.194
Recurrence0 (0.0)1 (2.3)0.3480 (0.0)1 (3.4)1.000
Table 3 Outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection and transanal endoscopic microsurgery groups according to lesion size, n (%)
Variables< 10 mm (n = 84)
10-20 mm (n = 44)
ESD (n = 56)
TEM (n = 28)
P value
ESD (n = 28)
TEM (n = 16)
P value
Lesion size, mm, median (IQR)6.0 (5.0-8.0)5.0 (4.5-8.0)0.10110.0 (10.0-12.0)11.0 (10.0-15.0)0.277
Age, year, mean ± SD44.8 ± 14.144.3 ± 11.90.87244.4 ± 12.447.1 ± 12.90.513
Follow-up time, month, median (IQR)24.5 (12.5-36.0)23.0 (15.0-38.0)0.96235.0 (20.0-54.0)30.0 (22.5-48.0)0.798
Hospital day, day, median (IQR)6.0 (5.0-7.0)9.0 (7.0-11.5)< 0.0016.0 (5.0-7.0)9.0 (7.0-13.0)< 0.001
Cost, kilo-CNY, median (IQR)10.8 (9.5-12.2)22.4 (18.3-26.7)< 0.00111.5 (10.2-12.6)20.0 (16.9-24.8)< 0.001
Adverse event1 (1.8)1 (3.6)1.0002 (7.1)1 (6.3)1.000
En bloc resection56 (100.0)28 (100.0)/23 (100.0)16 (100.0)/
R0 resection50 (89.3)27 (96.4)0.41623 (82.1)16 (100.0)0.141
Recurrence0 (0.0)0 (0.0)/0 (0.0)1 (6.3)0.364
Table 4 The characteristics of 12 lesions with non-R0 resection, n (%)

Non-R0 resection, n = 12
R0 resection, n = 116
P value
Age, year, mean ± SD39.6 ± 9.445.4 ± 13.20.138
Lesion size, mm, median (IQR)8.0 (5.0-10.0)8.0 (5.0-10.0)0.885
Male8 (66.7)67 (57.8)0.764
Location
    Anus ≤ 5 cm5 (41.7)50 (43.1)0.924
    Anus > 5 cm7 (58.3)66 (56.9)
Resection method
    ESD11 (91.7)73 (62.9)0.057
    TEM1 (8.3)43 (37.1)
Grade
    G112 (100.0)92 (79.3)0.121
    G20 (0.0)24 (20.7)
Invasion depth
    Mucosal0 (0.0)8 (6.9)1.000
    Submucosal12 (100.0)108 (93.1)
Vascular invasion0 (0.0)1 (0.9)1.000
Perineural invasion0 (0.0)1 (0.9)1.000