Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Aug 16, 2024; 16(8): 451-461
Published online Aug 16, 2024. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i8.451
Table 1 Suggested clinical outcomes to be included in future gastric outlet obstruction research
Outcome
Instruments/measures
Definition
Advantages
Disadvantages
Nutrition
Body compositionBody mass index[20]Weight (Kg) divided by the square of height (m)Easy assessment
No need for laboratory or instrumental tests
Affected by hypervolemia[5]; Does not accurately predict lean body mass[64]
Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis[34,65]Body composition measurement (fat, bone, water and muscle) through levels of resistance to electrical currentNoninvasive; Allows detailed knowledge of hydration status and cell mass Requires extra resources; Equipment cost
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry[34,66]Low-dose radiation technique measuring bone mineral density and body composition, such as fat mass and fat free massNoninvasive; Radiation dose lower than CT; Short scan time; Whole-body scanAvailability; Cost of equipment; Training; Exposure to ionizing radiation
CT-based assessment of skeletal muscle massSarcopenia: Loss of skeletal muscle mass[31]
Most widely assessed using SMI (calculated by adjusting the total muscle area at the L3 vertebral level to the body height of the patient)[63,67]
Defined by CT images routinely used in standard care of PC patients; Low cost of using available CT images[63]; Directly correlates with the whole-body skeletal muscle mass[63]; AI-based evaluation may decrease the time for segmentation[68]Heterogeneity regarding radiological definition of sarcopenia due to varying indices used such as SMI, PMI, SBI[67,69]; Threshold values for sarcopenia vary for different patient populations[63,70]; Training and time for analysis[63]
Biochemical parametersPrognostic nutrition index[35,38]Calculated using serum albumin and total lymphocyte count; Reflects nutrition and immune statusEasy to calculate and to follow up; Good predictive ability for prognosis in several cancersNeed for further validation in patients undergoing invasive procedures
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio[35,38]Ratio between the neutrophil and lymphocyte counts measured in peripheral bloodEasy to calculate and to follow upNeed for further validation in patients undergoing invasive procedures
Albumin-to-globulin ratio[40]Ratio between albumin and globulin measured in peripheral bloodEasy to calculate and to follow up; Not affected by body fluid balanceNeed for further validation in patients undergoing invasive procedures
QoLEORTC QLQ-C30[49]The 30 item core cancer questionnaire to assess health-related QoLEasy to assess and administerTime-consuming; Accuracy could vary depending on patient’s education and psychiatric medication consumption
EORTC QLQ-PAN26[52]To assess health-related QoL for people with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaEasy to assess and administer; Validated in the palliative and surgical settingsTime-consuming; Accuracy could vary depending on patient’s education and psychiatric medication consumption
EuroQol EQ-5D[48,55]Five dimensions health-related QoL questionnaire for use in clinical and population health surveysEasy to assess and administerTime-consuming; Does not specifically evaluate nutrition or eating ability
The FAACT[50,53]A patient-reported measure designed to specifically assess anorexia/cachexia-related symptomsDeveloped for adult cancer patients, experiencing anorexia/cachexia; Easy to assess and administerControversy around optimal cut-off
The Anorexia/Cachexia Subscale (A/CS) of the FAACT questionnaire[50,53]A specific subscale of FAACTAs FAACTAs FAACT
Chemotherapy toleranceRDI[59,60]The ratio of the delivered dose intensity (dose per unit body surface area per unit time [mg/m2 per week]) to the standard or planned dose intensity for a chemotherapy regimenIt may correlate with survival;
RDI informs personalized treatment adjustments
Defining clinically meaningful RDI thresholds (e.g., 80% or 85%) remains challenging; Doesn’t directly account for non-hematologic toxicities; Difficult to calculate a merged RDI for regimens with multiple drugs; Relies on accurate dosing data, not consistently recorded in clinical practice
Time to chemotherapy initiation or resumption[2,6,61]Time from the procedure to chemotherapy initiation or resumptionTime-depending outcome; Detailed evaluation of the impact of the procedure on the systemic therapyBetter to be evaluated in prospective studies