Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Aug 16, 2024; 16(8): 451-461
Published online Aug 16, 2024. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i8.451
Published online Aug 16, 2024. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i8.451
Outcome | Instruments/measures | Definition | Advantages | Disadvantages |
Nutrition | ||||
Body composition | Body mass index[20] | Weight (Kg) divided by the square of height (m) | Easy assessment No need for laboratory or instrumental tests | Affected by hypervolemia[5]; Does not accurately predict lean body mass[64] |
Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis[34,65] | Body composition measurement (fat, bone, water and muscle) through levels of resistance to electrical current | Noninvasive; Allows detailed knowledge of hydration status and cell mass | Requires extra resources; Equipment cost | |
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry[34,66] | Low-dose radiation technique measuring bone mineral density and body composition, such as fat mass and fat free mass | Noninvasive; Radiation dose lower than CT; Short scan time; Whole-body scan | Availability; Cost of equipment; Training; Exposure to ionizing radiation | |
CT-based assessment of skeletal muscle mass | Sarcopenia: Loss of skeletal muscle mass[31] Most widely assessed using SMI (calculated by adjusting the total muscle area at the L3 vertebral level to the body height of the patient)[63,67] | Defined by CT images routinely used in standard care of PC patients; Low cost of using available CT images[63]; Directly correlates with the whole-body skeletal muscle mass[63]; AI-based evaluation may decrease the time for segmentation[68] | Heterogeneity regarding radiological definition of sarcopenia due to varying indices used such as SMI, PMI, SBI[67,69]; Threshold values for sarcopenia vary for different patient populations[63,70]; Training and time for analysis[63] | |
Biochemical parameters | Prognostic nutrition index[35,38] | Calculated using serum albumin and total lymphocyte count; Reflects nutrition and immune status | Easy to calculate and to follow up; Good predictive ability for prognosis in several cancers | Need for further validation in patients undergoing invasive procedures |
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio[35,38] | Ratio between the neutrophil and lymphocyte counts measured in peripheral blood | Easy to calculate and to follow up | Need for further validation in patients undergoing invasive procedures | |
Albumin-to-globulin ratio[40] | Ratio between albumin and globulin measured in peripheral blood | Easy to calculate and to follow up; Not affected by body fluid balance | Need for further validation in patients undergoing invasive procedures | |
QoL | EORTC QLQ-C30[49] | The 30 item core cancer questionnaire to assess health-related QoL | Easy to assess and administer | Time-consuming; Accuracy could vary depending on patient’s education and psychiatric medication consumption |
EORTC QLQ-PAN26[52] | To assess health-related QoL for people with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma | Easy to assess and administer; Validated in the palliative and surgical settings | Time-consuming; Accuracy could vary depending on patient’s education and psychiatric medication consumption | |
EuroQol EQ-5D[48,55] | Five dimensions health-related QoL questionnaire for use in clinical and population health surveys | Easy to assess and administer | Time-consuming; Does not specifically evaluate nutrition or eating ability | |
The FAACT[50,53] | A patient-reported measure designed to specifically assess anorexia/cachexia-related symptoms | Developed for adult cancer patients, experiencing anorexia/cachexia; Easy to assess and administer | Controversy around optimal cut-off | |
The Anorexia/Cachexia Subscale (A/CS) of the FAACT questionnaire[50,53] | A specific subscale of FAACT | As FAACT | As FAACT | |
Chemotherapy tolerance | RDI[59,60] | The ratio of the delivered dose intensity (dose per unit body surface area per unit time [mg/m2 per week]) to the standard or planned dose intensity for a chemotherapy regimen | It may correlate with survival; RDI informs personalized treatment adjustments | Defining clinically meaningful RDI thresholds (e.g., 80% or 85%) remains challenging; Doesn’t directly account for non-hematologic toxicities; Difficult to calculate a merged RDI for regimens with multiple drugs; Relies on accurate dosing data, not consistently recorded in clinical practice |
Time to chemotherapy initiation or resumption[2,6,61] | Time from the procedure to chemotherapy initiation or resumption | Time-depending outcome; Detailed evaluation of the impact of the procedure on the systemic therapy | Better to be evaluated in prospective studies |
- Citation: Vilas-Boas F, Rizzo GEM, De Ponthaud C, Robinson S, Gaujoux S, Capurso G, Vanella G, Bozkırlı B. Unveiling hidden outcomes in malignant gastric outlet obstruction research – insights from a "Pancreas 2000" review. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 16(8): 451-461
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v16/i8/451.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v16.i8.451