Randomized Clinical Trial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Dec 16, 2022; 14(12): 777-788
Published online Dec 16, 2022. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i12.777
Table 1 Characteristics of the patient at baseline (n, %)
Characteristics
SNC (n = 154)
HFMG (n = 138)
Age (median, IQR)64, 56 to 7259, 48.5 to 69.5
Male71, 46.1%67, 48.6%
Weight, kg (mean, SD)76.4, 13.676.1, 14.8
BMI, kg/m2 (mean, SD)26.6, 4.126.4, 3.9
ASA classification, I/II/III14/67/73, 9.1%/43.5%/47.4%16/58/64, 11.6%/42.0%/46.4%
Mallampati class, I/II/III54/70/30, 35.1%/45.4%/19.5%48/70/20, 34.8%/50.7%/14.5%
Baseline oximetry, SpO2 (median, IQR)97%, 95% to 99%98%, 97% to 99%
Past medical history
Current smoking history14, 9.1%14, 10.1%
Obstructive sleep apnoea 8, 5.2%6, 4.3%
Hypertension 69, 44.8%46, 33.3%
Ischemic heart disease 19, 12.3%9, 6.5%
Diabetes mellitus 34, 22.1%33, 23.9%
Dyslipidemia 36, 23.4%26, 18.8%
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 8, 5.2%11, 8%
Asthma 9, 5.8%11, 8%
Cirrhosis 25, 16.2%34, 24.6%
Orthotopic liver transplantation 19, 12.3%25, 18.1%
Table 2 Anaesthetic care parameters (n, %)
Anaesthetic care
SNC (n = 154)
HFMG (n = 138)
P value
Duration of sedation, min (median, IQR)12, 6.9 to 17.112, 6.5 to 17.50.421
Propofol dose, mg/kg/hr (median, IQR)13.3, 8.5 to 18.114.1, 7.8 to 20.50.189
Opioids 89, 57.8%73, 52.9%0.631
Fentanyl52, 33.8%40, 29.0%
Alfentanil 37, 24.0%33, 23.9%
Midazolam26, 16.9%23, 16.7%0.961
Table 3 Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy parameters (n, %)
Endoscopy parameters
SNC, (n = 154)
HFMG, (n = 138)
P value
Duration of procedure, min (median, IQR)10, 5.5 to 14.510, 4.5 to 15.50.684
Types of procedure0.175
Diagnostic Procedure87, 56.5%67, 48.6%
Therapeutic Procedure 67, 43.5%71, 51.4%
Types of upper GI endoscopy0.27
Gastroscopy 106, 68.8%96, 69.6%
Duodenoscope1, 0.6%1, 0.7%
ERCP 32, 20.8%34, 24.6%
EUS 12, 7.8%3, 2.2%
Gastroscopy + EUS 3, 1.9%4, 2.9%
Table 4 Primary and secondary end points for the intention-to-treat analysis end point (n, %)
End point
SNC (n = 154)
HFMG (n = 138)
P value
Primary endpoint
SpO2 < 90% of any duration 34, 22.1%6, 4.4%< 0.001
Secondary endpoint
Lowest SpO2 (median, IQR)95%, 91% to 99%98%, 96.5% to 99.5%< 0.001
Any episode of hypoxaemia 74, 48.1%26, 18.8%< 0.001
SpO2 90%-94% of any duration40, 26.0%20, 14.5%0.015
SpO2 76%-89% of any duration 28, 18.2%6, 4.3%< 0.001
SpO2 ≤ 75% of any duration 6, 3.9%0, 0%0.019
Clinically significant episode of hypoxaemia132, 20.8%1, 0.7%< 0.001
SpO2 < 85% of any duration19, 12.3%3, 2.2%0.001
Table 5 Patient-reported outcomes for the intention-to-treat analysis (n, %)
Patient-reported outcomes – Likert scale
SNC (n = 154)
HFMG (n = 138)
P value
(1 = Very uncomfortable or unbearable, 5 = Very comfortable or not at all)
Response rate115, 74.7%102, 73.9%0.882
Comfort level ≤ 24, 3.5%5, 4.9%0.6
Abdominal pain ≤ 23, 2.6%0, 0.0%0.1
Bloating ≤ 21, 0.9%1, 1.0%0.932
Mouth dryness ≤ 22, 1.7%1, 1.0%0.633
Mouth pain ≤ 22, 1.7%1, 1.0%0.633
Headache ≤ 21, 0.9%1, 1.0%0.932