Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Nov 16, 2021; 13(11): 555-564
Published online Nov 16, 2021. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v13.i11.555
Table 1 Patients demographics and pancreatic cystic lesions features
Characteristic
Enrolled, n (%)
Patients, n59
Age64 ± 13
Sex, female41 (70)
Clinical presentation
Asymptomatic45 (76)
Abdominal pain11 (19)
Pancreatitis3 (5)
Site of lesion
Head13 (22)
Uncinate process8 (13)
Neck6 (10)
Body26 (45)
Tail6 (10)
Cyst diameter mm32 (22-45)
Morphology
Unilocular macrocyst31 (52)
Multilocular microcyst27 (46)
Microcyst1 (2)
Main pancreatic duct diameter > 3 mm5 (8)
Communication with a duct1 (2)
Cyst wall diameter > 1 mm20 (34)
Septa and/or wall nodules35 (59)
CEA > 192 ng/mL21 (35)
Amylases ≥ 50 UI/L53 (90)
Table 2 Final diagnosis
Final diagnosis
n (%)
Serous cystoadenoma13 (22)
Cystoadenocarcinoma1 (2)
Branch-duct IPMN34 (58)
Mucinous cystoadenoma11 (18)
Table 3 Diagnostic yield of carcinoembryonic antigen and needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in mucinous vs non-mucinous lesions

Sensitivity (%)
Specificity (%)
Accuracy (%)
CEA > 192 ng/mL58.0100.067.0
nCLE mucinous vs non-mucinous80.0100.084.0