Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. May 16, 2019; 11(5): 383-388
Published online May 16, 2019. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i5.383
Published online May 16, 2019. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i5.383
Case report | Findings seen on (1) colonoscopy and (2) histology |
Barton[6], 2006 | (1) Ulcerative ileitis (2) Eosinophilic infiltrates |
Al-Gahmi et al[7], 2012 | (1) Isolated ulceration in the terminal ileum (2) Inflammatory changes and eosinophilic infiltrate but no evidence of malignancy or granulomas |
Mokrim et al[8], 2014 | (1) Inflammatory changes in the ileal mucosa (2) Absence of intraepithelial lymphocytic infiltrates in favour of a non-atrophic ileitis |
Van Hellemond et al[9], 2018 | Terminal ileitis Extensive inflammation of the small intestine |
Case 1 | (1) Evidence of granular erythematous mucosa with ulceration both above and below the ileocolonic anastomosis in the terminal ileum and ascending colon(2) Mucosal erosion with acute and chronic inflammation and occasional atypical glands most likely representing reactive changes without evidence of Cytomegalovirus or herpes simplex viruses on immunohistochemical stains |
Case 2 | (1) On colonoscopy, the terminal ileum was found to have diffuse pseudomembranes with severe inflammatory exudates and spontaneous bleeding.(2) Necrotic and inflammatory debris, but was negative for granulomas or viral inclusions. |
- Citation: Dao AE, Hsu A, Nakshabandi A, Mandaliya R, Nadella S, Sivaraman A, Mattar M, Charabaty A. Role of colonoscopy in diagnosis of capecitabine associated ileitis: Two case reports. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 11(5): 383-388
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v11/i5/383.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v11.i5.383