Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Mar 16, 2019; 11(3): 239-248
Published online Mar 16, 2019. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i3.239
Published online Mar 16, 2019. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i3.239
Ref. | Country | Centers | Type of study | Subjects (EMR + RFA/RFA alone | Outcomes |
Li et al[10], 2015 | USA | 148 | Observational retrospective | 1263 (406/857) | Efficacy and safety |
Strauss et al[11], 2014 | USA | 2 | Observational retrospective | 36 (31/5) | Efficacy and safety |
Haidry et al[12], 2013 | England | 19 | Observational retrospective | 335 (164/171) | Efficacy and safety |
Kim et al[14], 2012 | USA | 1 | Observational retrospective | 169 (65/104) | Efficacy and safety |
Caillol et al[15], 2012 | France | 1 | Observational retrospective | 34 (16/18) | Efficacy and safety |
Okoro et al[16], 2012 | USA | 1 | Observational retrospective | 100 (44/46) | Efficacy and safety |
Pouw et al[17], 2008 | The Netherlands | 1 | Observational retrospective | 44 (31/13) | Efficacy and safety |
Ref. | Selection | Comparability | Outcome | Points | |||||
Representativeness of the exposed cohort | Selection of the unexposed cohort | Ascertainment of exposure | Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at the start of study | Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis | Assessment of outcome | Was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur | Adequacy of follow-up of cohort | ||
Li et al[10], 2015 | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | 7 Points | |
Strauss et al[11], 2014 | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | 8 Points |
Haidry et al[12], 2013 | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | 7 Points | |
Kim et al[14], 2012 | × | × | × | × | × | × | 6 Points | ||
Caillol et al[15], 2012 | × | × | × | × | × | × | 6 Points | ||
Okoro et al[16], 2012 | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | 7 Points | |
Pouw et al[17], 2008 | × | × | × | × | ×× | × | × | 8 Points |
Ref. | Endoscopic resection method | Residual BE diagnosis method |
Li et al[10], 2015 | Not mentioned | Not mentioned |
Strauss et al[11], 2014 | Duette device | Not mentioned |
Haidry et al[12], 2013 | Duette device | Not mentioned |
Kim et al[14], 2012 | ER-cap technique (Olympus) (55%); Duette device (45%) | NBI assisted |
Caillol et al[15], 2012 | Duette device or double channel technique | Staining with acetic acid or high definition endoscopy |
Okoro et al[16], 2012 | ER-cap technique (Olympus) and Duette device* | Not mentioned |
Pouw et al[17], 2008 | ER-cap technique (Olympus) and Duette device* | Lugol’s staining (2%) or narrow-band imaging1 |
- Citation: de Matos MV, da Ponte-Neto AM, de Moura DTH, Maahs ED, Chaves DM, Baba ER, Ide E, Sallum R, Bernardo WM, de Moura EGH. Treatment of high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma using radiofrequency ablation or endoscopic mucosal resection + radiofrequency ablation: Meta-analysis and systematic review. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 11(3): 239-248
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v11/i3/239.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v11.i3.239