Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Nov 16, 2019; 11(11): 531-540
Published online Nov 16, 2019. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i11.531
Table 1 Patient characteristics
Patient characteristics
Age, mean ± SD, yr66.9 ± 11.7
Sex, male/female26/30
Cyst size, mm28.8 (12-85)
Location
Uncinate4
Head13
Neck16
Body7
Tail16
Biopsy times3.14 (1-6)
Pre-biopsy clinical diagnosis
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm31
Unknown18
Pseudocyst5
Mucinous cystadenoma1
Neuroendocrine tumor1
Table 2 Results of endoscopic guided through the needle biopsy
Technical success100% (56/56)
Clinical success80.4% (45/56)
Adverse events3.6% (2/56)
Histopathological diagnosis by EUS-TTNB
IPMN32
Pseudocyst4
Serous cyst neoplasm4
Neuroendocrine tumor2
Adenocarcinoma2
Paraganglioma1
Inconclusive11
Subtyping of IPMN (n = 32)
Gastric type19
Pancreatobiliary type4
Inconclusive9
Table 3 Comparison between endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration and endoscopic ultrasound-through-the-needle biopsy
EUS-FNAEUS-TTNBP value
Clinical success25% (14/56)80.4% (45/56)< 0.001
Mucinous cyst diagnosis in cysts > CEA 192 ng/mL12% (3/25)52% (13/25)0.005
Mucinous cyst diagnosis in cysts < CEA 192 ng/mL15.4% (2/13)76.9% (10/13)0.005