Pu LZCT, Cheong KL, Koay DSC, Yeap SP, Ovenden A, Raju M, Ruszkiewicz A, Chiu PW, Lau JY, Singh R. Randomised controlled trial comparing modified Sano’s and narrow band imaging international colorectal endoscopic classifications for colorectal lesions. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 10(9): 210-218 [PMID: 30283604 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i9.210]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Rajvinder Singh, FRACP, FRCP (C), MBBS, MPhil, MRCP, Doctor, Professor, Department of Gastroenterology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Haydown Road, Elizabeth Vale, Adelaide, SA 5112, Australia. rajvinder.singh@sa.gov.au
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 16, 2018; 10(9): 210-218 Published online Sep 16, 2018. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i9.210
Table 1 Narrow band imaging international colorectal endoscopic classification of colorectal polyps was based on 3 features including colour, vessel, architecture and surface pattern
NICE I
NICE II
NICE III
Colour
Same or lighter than background
Browner than background
Dark brown relative to background +/- patchy whiter areas
Vessels
None or isolated lacy vessels
Brown vessels surrounding white structures
Disrupted or missing vessels
Surface pattern
Dark or white spots of uniform size, or homogeneous absence of pattern
Oval, tubular or branched white structure surrounded by brown vessels
Amorphous or absent surface pattern
Likely pathology
Hyperplastic
Adenoma
Deep submucosal invasive cancer
Table 2 Demographics of study participants
Classification
Modified Sano’s
NICE
P value
age (mean ± SD)
62.18 ± 14.06
64.41 ± 11.36
NS
M:F (% male)
191:118 (62%)
178:76 (70%)
NS
Indication n (%)
Screening
156 (50)
115 (45)
NS
Surveillance
86 (28)
88 (35)
Symptoms
63 (20)
49 (19)
Others
4 (1)
2 (1)
Total
309
254
Table 3 Characteristics of colon polyps
Classification
Modified Sano’s
NICE
P value
Confidence level n (%)
High
309 (96.3)
254 (78)
<0.0001
Low
12 (3.7)
72 (22)
Total
321
326
Distribution based on size
≤ 5 mm
151
127
NS
6-9 mm
63
42
≥ 10 mm
95
85
Size (mean ± SD, mm)
10.17 ± 11.30
14.48 ± 19.47
0.0036
Polyp distribution n (%)
Right colon
95 (31)
101 (40)
NS
Transverse colon
60 (19)
52 (20)
Descending colon
34 (11)
27 (11)
Rectosigmoid colon
120 (39)
74 (29)
Total
309
254
Paris n (%)
1p
28 (9)
18 (7)
NS
1s
190 (61)
156 (61)
2a
81 (26)
71 (28)
2b
4 (1)
1 (1)
2c
5 (2)
6 (2)
3
1 (1)
2 (1)
Others
12
15
Total
309
254
Table 4 Accuracy of modified sano’s IIo class for sessile serrated adenoma/polyp
Citation: Pu LZCT, Cheong KL, Koay DSC, Yeap SP, Ovenden A, Raju M, Ruszkiewicz A, Chiu PW, Lau JY, Singh R. Randomised controlled trial comparing modified Sano’s and narrow band imaging international colorectal endoscopic classifications for colorectal lesions. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 10(9): 210-218