Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Nov 16, 2018; 10(11): 367-377
Published online Nov 16, 2018. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i11.367
Published online Nov 16, 2018. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i11.367
Case 1 | Case 2 | ||
Demographic details | Age/Sex | 37/F | 42/M |
BMI (kg/m2) at presentation | 13.2 | 15.6 | |
Acid consumed | Sulphuric acid | Nitric acid | |
Time since acid was consumed | 4 mo | 11 mo | |
No. of strictures on esophagogram | 1 | 2 | |
Approximate length of stricture | 3.5 cm | 4 cm (proximal stricture) | |
5 mm (distal stricture) | |||
Near-total stricture communicated with which piriform sinus | Right piriform sinus | Right piriform sinus | |
Concomitant gastric stricture | No | No | |
Whether feeding jejunostomy was performed? | No | No | |
Endoscopic procedural details | Time taken for the passage of guide-wire across the stricture | First session: Failed | 14 min |
Second session: 22 min | |||
Dilatation details | |||
First balloon dilatation till | 6 mm | 6 mm | |
No. of dilatations to reach 14 mm | 3 | 4 | |
Residual stricture after dilatation on esophagogram | Yes | Proximal stricture: Yes | |
Distal stricture: No | |||
Time taken for electro-incision | 12 min | 10 min | |
Primary outcome | Complete relief of dysphagia along with the resolution of stricture(s) on esophagogram and endoscopy, performed after 2 wk of full endoscopic therapy | Yes | Yes |
Secondary outcomes | Intraprocedural complication | None | None |
Post-procedural complication | None | None | |
Duration of the follow-up | 22 mo | 14 mo | |
Improvement in activities after the procedure | Yes | Yes | |
Recurrence of dysphagia during the follow-up or any need of additional therapy | No | No | |
Any regurgitation episode during the follow-up | No | No | |
Any aspiration episode during the follow-up | No | No | |
BMI at last follow-up (kg/m2) | 21.6 | 23.8 |
Surgery | Rigid Endoscopy | Flexible Endoscopy | |
Hospital admission | Required | Required | Not required |
Performed by | Gastro-surgeons in the operation theatres | ENT surgeons in the operation theatres | Gastroenterologists or surgical endoscopists in the endoscopy suites |
Hyper-extension of the patient’s neck | Not required | Required | Not required |
Type of anesthesia given | General anesthesia | General anesthesia | Conscious sedation |
Anesthetic and procedural time | Longest | Long | Short |
External incision over the neck or chest wall | External incision is given. This predisposes to post-operative complications like fistula, wound infection and hematoma formation | Not given | Not given |
Concomitant esophageal cicatrisation | Can be tackled | Cannot be tackled | Can be tackled |
Clinical recovery after the procedure | Slow | Intermediate | Quick |
Morbidity and mortality associated with the technique | High | Low | Least |
Contraindications | Elderly patients with comorbidities | Short neck | None |
Severe malnutrition | Retrognathia | ||
Inability to give general anesthesia | Inability to give general anesthesia | ||
Experience with the procedure till date | Maximum | Limited | Limited |
- Citation: Dhaliwal HS, Kumar N, Siddappa PK, Singh R, Sekhon JS, Masih J, Abraham J, Garg S. Tight near-total corrosive strictures of the proximal esophagus with concomitant involvement of the hypopharynx: Flexible endoscopic management using a novel technique. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 10(11): 367-377
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v10/i11/367.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v10.i11.367