Published online Apr 16, 2017. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i4.149
Peer-review started: January 27, 2016
First decision: March 23, 2016
Revised: January 3, 2017
Accepted: January 11, 2017
Article in press: January 14, 2017
Published online: April 16, 2017
Processing time: 444 Days and 7.4 Hours
Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory disease of digestive tract. Approximately 70% of patients with CD require surgical intervention within 10 years of their initial diagnosis, despite advanced medical treatment alternatives including biologics, immune suppressive drugs and steroids. Refractory to medical treatment in CD patients is the common indication for surgery. Unfortunately, surgery cannot cure the disease. Minimally invasive treatment modalities can be suitable for CD patients due to the benign nature of the disease especially at the time of index surgery. However, laparoscopic management in fistulizing or recurrent disease is controversial. Intractable fibrotic strictures with obstruction, fistulas with abscess formation and hemorrhage are the surgical indications of recurrent CD, which are also complicating laparoscopic treatments. Nevertheless, laparoscopy can be performed in selected CD patients with safety, and may provide better outcomes compared to open surgery. The common complication after laparoscopic intervention is postoperative ileus seems and this may strongly relate excessive manipulation of the bowel during dissection. But additionally, unsuccessful laparoscopic attempts requiring conversion to open surgery have been a major concern due to presumed risk of worse outcomes. However, recent data show that conversions do not to worsen the outcomes of colorectal surgery in experienced hands. In conclusion, laparoscopic treatment modalities in recurrent CD patients have promising outcomes when it is used selectively.
Core tip: Despite advanced medical treatment alternatives including biologics, immune suppressive drugs and steroids, approximately 70% of patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) require surgical intervention within 10 years of their initial diagnosis. Forty percent to 50% of patients who had an index surgery for CD require a reoperation for recurrent disease in 10 years. Index surgical treatment type and medications used after index surgery appears to be factors related to recurrence risk of CD. In experienced hands, laparoscopic approach has promising outcomes in patients with recurrent CD when it is used selectively.
- Citation: Sevim Y, Akyol C, Aytac E, Baca B, Bulut O, Remzi FH. Laparoscopic surgery for complex and recurrent Crohn’s disease. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 9(4): 149-152
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v9/i4/149.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v9.i4.149
Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory disease that can develop any part of the digestive tract. CD usually arises at the terminal ileum[1]. Despite advanced medical treatment alternatives including biologics, immune suppressive drugs and steroids, approximately 70% of patients with CD require surgical intervention within 10 years of their initial diagnosis[2,3]. Surgery is warranted for management of medically refractory CD. Surgical treatment overcomes emergent issues, improves symptoms and patient’s quality of life. Unfortunately, there is no cure for CD and it tends to recur during the disease course. Recurrent CD is described based on treatment type including medical, endoscopic or surgical.
Endoscopically documented recurrent CD can be up to 93% within one year following intestinal resection[4], while clinically symptomatic recurrence is usually around 30% at first 3 years after surgery[5]. Forty percent to 50% of patients who had an index surgery for CD require a reoperation for recurrent disease in 10 years[6,7]. Index surgical treatment type and medications used after index surgery appears to be factors related to recurrence risk of CD[2,8-10]. CD patients can be good candidates for minimally invasive treatment modalities due to the benign nature of the disease especially at the time of index surgery. However, use of laparoscopy in patients with complex CD such as extensive fistulizing or recurrent disease requiring surgical treatment is controversial.
Majority of the surgical indications for recurrent CD are also the conditions complicating application of laparoscopic surgery such as intractable fibrotic strictures with obstruction, fistulas with abscess formation and hemorrhage[11,12]. Based on the extension and severity of disease, surgical options including strictureplasty, small bowel resection, ileocolectomy, internal bypass, partial/total colectomy and proctectomy may be performed laparoscopically[11,13]. In selected CD patients, laparoscopic surgery is safe, feasible and provides better outcomes compared to open surgery[14-17]. While operative times have decreased with increased experience, operative mortality is almost none and morbidity rates ranged from 10% to 40% in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for recurrent CD[17-19]. Postoperative ileus seems as the most common complication which may strongly relate excessive manipulation of the bowel during dissection[13]. Some surgeons believe that laparoscopic approach may also provide the well-known advantages of minimally invasive surgery such as reduced postoperative pain, lower morbidity, shorter hospital stay, earlier return to daily activity, and improved quality of life in patients with recurrent CD (Table 1).
Ref. | Year | Patients surgery (n) | Conversion to open surgery (n) | Operative duration (min) | Hospital stay (d) |
Wu et al[17] | 1997 | CL: 14 | 1 | 152 | 4.8 |
RL: 10 | 2 | 144 | 3.9 | ||
PL: 22 | 2 | 139 | 4.5 | ||
O: 70 | (-) | 202a | 7.9a | ||
Hasegawa et al[28] | 2003 | RL: 16 | 2 | 210a | 6.0 |
PL: 45 | 3 | 180 | 8.0 | ||
Moorthy et al[22] | 2004 | RL: 26 | 11 | 118 | 8.0 |
PL: 31 | 4 | 127 | 7.0 | ||
Goyer et al[32] | 2009 | Comp: 54b | 20a | 214a | 8.0 |
Uncomp: 70 | 10 | 191 | 7.0 | ||
Chaudhary et al[21] | 2010 | RL: 30 | 2 | 125a | 3.0 |
PL: 29 | 3 | 85 | 3.0 | ||
Brouquet et al[27] | 2010 | L: 29 | 9 | 215 | 9.0 |
O: 33 | 226 | 9.0 | |||
Pinto et al[18] | 2011 | RL: 50 | 16 | 201 | 7.4 |
PL: 80 | 15 | 182 | 6.7 | ||
Aytac et al[13] | 2012 | L: 26 | 3 | 169 | 6.4 |
O: 26 | 158 | 6.9 | |||
Huang et al[20] | 2012 | RL: 48 | 10 | 100 | ND |
PL: 82 | 14 | 106 | ND |
Unsuccessful laparoscopic attempts requiring conversion to open surgery have been a major concern due to presumed risk of worse outcomes and conversion rates tend to be higher in laparoscopic operations for recurrent CD[20]. Conversion to open surgery rates varies between 6.7% and 42.3% in recurrent CD cases[21,22]. The most common cause of conversion was adhesions[13,23]. Having multiple resections, intraabdominal abscess and phlegmon are the other factors leading conversion in CD patients[22]. This clinical situation raises concerns on conversion related postoperative morbidity[24]. However, recent data show that conversions do not to worsen the outcomes of colorectal surgery in experienced hands[25]. The data regarding to operation type and disease characteristics especially related to index resection for CD are heterogeneous in the previous reports[26,27]. Outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for recurrent CD vary due to selection bias and experience of the surgeon[27,28]. Laparoscopic surgery showed better outcomes with shorter length of hospital stay compared to open surgery in selected cases[28], while laparoscopic approach did not provide expected benefits over open surgery in some series[13,27]. Although wound complications are reduced, the benefits of laparoscopic surgery in patients with a history of previous open intestinal resection through midline laparotomy seem questionable[13]. As an emerging technique, single incision laparoscopy can be performed for recurrent CD[29,30]. Single incision laparoscopy can be promising in complex cases by minimizing overall wound size, decreasing unnecessary adhesiolysis for secondary port placements and it affords the surgeon the opportunity to inspect the density of adhesions through port site and lead the surgeon to convert the operation preemptively if laparoscopic surgery seems unfeasible[31].
In experienced hands, laparoscopic approach has promising outcomes in patients with recurrent CD when it is used selectively. There is a need for new studies which focus on identification of proper patients who may benefit from laparoscopic surgery for recurrent and complex CD.
Manuscript source: Invited manuscript
Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology
Country of origin: Turkey
Peer-review report classification
Grade A (Excellent): 0
Grade B (Very good): B, B
Grade C (Good): 0
Grade D (Fair): 0
Grade E (Poor): 0
P- Reviewer: Saniabadi AR, Vradelis S S- Editor: Song XX L- Editor: A E- Editor: Wu HL
1. | Longobardi T, Jacobs P, Bernstein CN. Work losses related to inflammatory bowel disease in the United States: results from the National Health Interview Survey. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:1064-1072. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 21] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 54] [Article Influence: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
2. | Bernell O, Lapidus A, Hellers G. Recurrence after colectomy in Crohn’s colitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:647-654; discussion 654. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
3. | Vind I, Riis L, Jess T, Knudsen E, Pedersen N, Elkjaer M, Bak Andersen I, Wewer V, Nørregaard P, Moesgaard F. Increasing incidences of inflammatory bowel disease and decreasing surgery rates in Copenhagen City and County, 2003-2005: a population-based study from the Danish Crohn colitis database. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1274-1282. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 379] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 379] [Article Influence: 21.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
4. | Olaison G, Smedh K, Sjödahl R. Natural course of Crohn’s disease after ileocolic resection: endoscopically visualised ileal ulcers preceding symptoms. Gut. 1992;33:331-335. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
5. | Sachar DB. The problem of postoperative recurrence of Crohn’s disease. Med Clin North Am. 1990;74:183-188. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
6. | Nordgren SR, Fasth SB, Oresland TO, Hultén LA. Long-term follow-up in Crohn’s disease. Mortality, morbidity, and functional status. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1994;29:1122-1128. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
7. | Aratari A, Papi C, Leandro G, Viscido A, Capurso L, Caprilli R. Early versus late surgery for ileo-caecal Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26:1303-1312. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 69] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 76] [Article Influence: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
8. | Renna S, Cammà C, Modesto I, Cabibbo G, Scimeca D, Civitavecchia G, Mocciaro F, Orlando A, Enea M, Cottone M. Meta-analysis of the placebo rates of clinical relapse and severe endoscopic recurrence in postoperative Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:1500-1509. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 68] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 67] [Article Influence: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
9. | Borley NR, Mortensen NJ, Chaudry MA, Mohammed S, Warren BF, George BD, Clark T, Jewell DP, Kettlewell MG. Recurrence after abdominal surgery for Crohn’s disease: relationship to disease site and surgical procedure. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:377-383. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
10. | Rutgeerts P, Goboes K, Peeters M, Hiele M, Penninckx F, Aerts R, Kerremans R, Vantrappen G. Effect of faecal stream diversion on recurrence of Crohn’s disease in the neoterminal ileum. Lancet. 1991;338:771-774. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
11. | Jones DW, Finlayson SR. Trends in surgery for Crohn’s disease in the era of infliximab. Ann Surg. 2010;252:307-312. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 108] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 116] [Article Influence: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
12. | Strong SA, Koltun WA, Hyman NH, Buie WD. Practice parameters for the surgical management of Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:1735-1746. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 32] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 36] [Article Influence: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
13. | Aytac E, Stocchi L, Remzi FH, Kiran RP. Is laparoscopic surgery for recurrent Crohn’s disease beneficial in patients with previous primary resection through midline laparotomy? A case-matched study. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:3552-3556. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 30] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 31] [Article Influence: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
14. | Alabaz O, Iroatulam AJ, Nessim A, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD. Comparison of laparoscopically assisted and conventional ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease. Eur J Surg. 2000;166:213-217. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 71] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 78] [Article Influence: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
15. | Bemelman WA, Slors JF, Dunker MS, van Hogezand RA, van Deventer SJ, Ringers J, Griffioen G, Gouma DJ. Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease. A comparative study. Surg Endosc. 2000;14:721-725. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
16. | Schmidt CM, Talamini MA, Kaufman HS, Lilliemoe KD, Learn P, Bayless T. Laparoscopic surgery for Crohn’s disease: reasons for conversion. Ann Surg. 2001;233:733-739. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
17. | Wu JS, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ, Fry RD, Read TE, Fleshman JW. Laparoscopic-assisted ileocolic resections in patients with Crohn’s disease: are abscesses, phlegmons, or recurrent disease contraindications? Surgery. 1997;122:682-688; discussion 682-688. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
18. | Pinto RA, Shawki S, Narita K, Weiss EG, Wexner SD. Laparoscopy for recurrent Crohn’s disease: how do the results compare with the results for primary Crohn’s disease? Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:302-307. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 35] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 40] [Article Influence: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
19. | Tavernier M, Lebreton G, Alves A. Laparoscopic surgery for complex Crohn’s disease. J Visc Surg. 2013;150:389-393. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
20. | Huang R, Valerian BT, Lee EC. Laparoscopic approach in patients with recurrent Crohn’s disease. Am Surg. 2012;78:595-599. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
21. | Chaudhary B, Glancy D, Dixon AR. Laparoscopic surgery for recurrent ileocolic Crohn’s disease is as safe and effective as primary resection. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:1413-1416. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 39] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 42] [Article Influence: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
22. | Moorthy K, Shaul T, Foley RJ. Factors that predict conversion in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for Crohn’s disease. Am J Surg. 2004;187:47-51. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
23. | Holubar SD, Dozois EJ, Privitera A, Cima RR, Pemberton JH, Young-Fadok T, Larson DW. Laparoscopic surgery for recurrent ileocolic Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010;16:1382-1386. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 35] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 31] [Article Influence: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
24. | Gonzalez R, Smith CD, Mason E, Duncan T, Wilson R, Miller J, Ramshaw BJ. Consequences of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:197-204. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 64] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 68] [Article Influence: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
25. | Aytac E, Stocchi L, Ozdemir Y, Kiran RP. Factors affecting morbidity after conversion of laparoscopic colorectal resections. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1641-1648. [Cited in This Article: ] |
26. | Bandyopadhyay D, Sagar PM, Mirnezami A, Lengyel J, Morrison C, Gatt M. Laparoscopic resection for recurrent Crohn’s disease: safety, feasibility and short-term outcomes. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:161-165. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
27. | Brouquet A, Bretagnol F, Soprani A, Valleur P, Bouhnik Y, Panis Y. A laparoscopic approach to iterative ileocolonic resection for the recurrence of Crohn’s disease. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:879-887. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 41] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 47] [Article Influence: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
28. | Hasegawa H, Watanabe M, Nishibori H, Okabayashi K, Hibi T, Kitajima M. Laparoscopic surgery for recurrent Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg. 2003;90:970-973. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 60] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 68] [Article Influence: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
29. | Kawahara H, Watanabe K, Ushigome T, Noaki R, Kobayashi S, Yanaga K. Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy for recurrent Crohn’s disease. Hepatogastroenterology. 2010;57:1170-1172. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
30. | Moftah M, Nazour F, Cunningham M, Cahill RA. Single port laparoscopic surgery for patients with complex and recurrent Crohn’s disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2014;8:1055-1061. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 21] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
31. | Aytac E, Stocchi L, Williams R, Remzi FH, Costedio MM. Single-port laparoscopic fecal diversion: more than cosmetic benefits? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014;24:e133-136. [Cited in This Article: ] |
32. | Goyer P, Alves A, Bretagnol F, Bouhnik Y, Valleur P, Panis Y. Impact of complex Crohn’s disease on the outcome of laparoscopic ileocecal resection: a comparative clinical study in 124 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:205-210. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 108] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 96] [Article Influence: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |