Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Apr 16, 2024; 16(4): 214-226
Published online Apr 16, 2024. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i4.214
Published online Apr 16, 2024. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i4.214
Figure 1
PRISMA flowchart outlining the study search.
Figure 2 Forest plot and meta-analysis.
A: Endoscopic submucosal dissection rebleeding; B: Peptic ulcer rebleeding; C: Rebleeding in peptic ulcer disease after excluding Park et al[21]; D: Blood transfusion in peptic ulcer disease; E: Blood transfusion in peptic ulcer disease after excluding Pittayanon et al[22]; F: Endoscopic intervention in peptic ulcer disease; G: Surgical intervention in peptic ulcer disease; H: Angiographic embolization in peptic ulcer disease; I: Hospital length of stay in peptic ulcer disease; J: Hospital length of stay in peptic ulcer disease after excluding Pittayanon et al[22]; K: Mortality in peptic ulcer disease. SLE: Second-look endoscopy.
Figure 3
Risk of bias graph of included randomized controlled trials based on the Cochrane risk-of-bias (RoB) assessment tool version 1.
Figure 4
Risk of bias summary of included randomized controlled trials based on the Cochrane risk-of-bias (RoB) assessment tool version 1.
- Citation: Kogilathota Jagirdhar GS, Perez JA, Banga A, Qasba RK, Qasba RK, Pattnaik H, Hussain M, Bains Y, Surani S. Role of second look endoscopy in endoscopic submucosal dissection and peptic ulcer bleeding: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 16(4): 214-226
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v16/i4/214.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v16.i4.214