Endoscopic ultrasound-guided vs endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography biliary drainage for obstructed distal malignant biliary strictures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

doi:10.4253/wjge.v11.i4.281

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 11, Issue 4

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (9282)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-7) series, Tables (1-3) series.

Item

Count

PDF

418

WORD

259

HTML

5780

Figures (1-7)

212

Tables (1-3)

148

Sum=6817

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

995

Download

1470

Sum=2465

Apr 16, 2019 (publication date) through May 5, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (26)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

ISSN

1948-5190

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Gastrointest Endosc. Apr 16, 2019; 11(4): 281-291
Published online Apr 16, 2019. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i4.281

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 Flow chart of study selection. Cochrane CENTRAL: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; EUS: Endoscopic ultrasound.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 2 Forest plot of technical success. M-H: Mantel-Haenszel test; EUS: Endoscopic ultrasound; ERCP: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 3 Forest plot of clinical success. M-H: Mantel-Haenszel test; EUS: Endoscopic ultrasound; ERCP: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 4 Forest plot of procedure duration in minutes. IV: Inverse variance test; EUS: Endoscopic ultrasound; ERCP: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 5 Forest plot of adverse events. M-H: Mantel-Haenszel test; EUS: Endoscopic ultrasound; ERCP: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 6 Forest plot of stent patency. IV: Inverse variance test; EUS: Endoscopic ultrasound; ERCP: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 7 Forest plot of stent dysfunction requiring intervention. M-H: Mantel-Haenszel test; EUS: Endoscopic ultrasound; ERCP: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Citation: Logiudice FP, Bernardo WM, Galetti F, Sagae VM, Matsubayashi CO, Madruga Neto AC, Brunaldi VO, de Moura DTH, Franzini T, Cheng S, Matuguma SE, de Moura EGH. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided vs endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography biliary drainage for obstructed distal malignant biliary strictures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 11(4): 281-291
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v11/i4/281.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v11.i4.281