Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Feb 16, 2019; 11(2): 124-132
Published online Feb 16, 2019. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i2.124
Published online Feb 16, 2019. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i2.124
Figure 1 Image quality comparison between Pillcam® SB3 and Pillcam® SB2 capsules for selected clinical findings.
A: Normal small intestinal lumen visualized with SB2 capsule; B: Vascular malformation visualized with SB2 capsule; C: Z-line visualized with SB2 capsule; D: Normal small intestinal lumen visualized with SB3 capsule; E: Vascular malformation visualized with SB3 capsule; F: Z-line visualized with SB3 capsule.
- Citation: Aasen TD, Wilhoite D, Rahman A, Devani K, Young M, Swenson J. No significant difference in clinically relevant findings between Pillcam® SB3 and Pillcam® SB2 capsules in a United States veteran population. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 11(2): 124-132
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v11/i2/124.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v11.i2.124