Is hepatic steatosis associated with left ventricular mass index increase in the general population?

doi:10.4254/wjh.v9.i19.857

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 9, Issue 19

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (6015)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-3) series, Tables (1-3) series.

Item

Count

PDF

231

WORD

108

HTML

2424

Figures (1-3)

276

Tables (1-3)

210

Sum=3249

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

941

Download

1825

Sum=2766

Jul 8, 2017 (publication date) through Nov 29, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (1)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Hepatology

ISSN

1948-5182

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Prospective Study

World J Hepatol. Jul 8, 2017; 9(19): 857-866
Published online Jul 8, 2017. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i19.857

Table 1 General and echocardiographic characteristics of the study population with and without hepatic steatosis at baseline n (%)

	No/one criterion for hepatic steatosis	US⁺ and ALT⁺	P-value
	n = 1106	n = 192
Age (yr), M (SD)	59.6 (8.8)	57.2 (7.8)	P < 0.01
Male gender	442 (40.0)	139 (72.4)	P < 0.001
School education			n.s.
< 10 yr	570 (51.5)	102 (53.1)
10 yr	358 (32.4)	67 (34.9)
> 10 yr	178 (16.1)	23 (12.0)
Waist circumference (cm), M (SD)	89.0 (11.5)	100.8 (10.9)	P < 0.001
Body weight (kg), M (SD)	75.6 (12.8)	88.6 (13.9)	P < 0.001
BMI, (kg/m²), M (SD)	27.4 (4.3)	30.5 (4.6)	P < 0.001
Smoking			P < 0.001
Never-smoker	516 (46.6)	57 (29.7)
Ex-smoker	382 (34.5)	99 (51.7)
Current smoker	208 (18.8)	36 (18.8)
Alcohol consumption (g/d), M (SD)	9.1 (14.5)	15.6 (19.5)	P < 0.001
Diabetes mellitus	100 (9.0)	26 (13.5)	P < 0.001
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg), M (SD)	139.3 (20.2)	148.5 (17.4)	P < 0.001
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg), M (SD)	84.7 (10.8)	89.9 (10.4)	P < 0.001
Pulse pressure (mmHg), M (SD)	54.6 (14.7)	58.6 (13.4)	P < 0.01
Hypertension	660 (59.7)	163 (84.9)	P < 0.001
Intake of drugs with ATC07	239 (21.6)	39 (20.3)	n.s.
Intake of drugs with ATC08	140 (12.7)	28 (14.6)	n.s.
Intake of drugs with ATC09	198 (17.9)	58 (30.2)	P < 0.001
IVS, M (SD)	9.7 (2.2)	10.9 (2.5)	P < 0.001
LVEDD, M (SD)	50.9 (5.6)	52.4 (5.9)	P < 0.01
PWD, M (SD)	9.6 (1.9)	10.4 (2.0)	P < 0.001
LVM (g), M (SD)	181.8 (53.5)	215.8 (61.3)	P < 0.001
LVMI (g/m^2.7), M (SD)	46.2 (13.3)	51.0 (13.7)	P < 0.001
LVH	499 (45.1)	114 (59.4)	P < 0.001

Pearson χ² and ANOVAs were used for bivariate comparisons. Data are given as numbers and percentages or means (standard deviation). US: Ultrasound; ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; ATC: Anatomical-therapeutic code; IVS: Interventricular septum thickness; LVEDD: Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; PWD: Posterior wall thickness; LVMI: Left ventricular mass index; LVH: Left ventricular hypertrophy; n.s.: Non-significant.

Table 2 Echocardiographic characteristics and blood pressure at baseline and follow-up in the study population with and without hepatic steatosis

	Baseline	Follow-up	P-value
	M (SD)	M (SD)	P-value
IVS, M (SD)
No/one criterion for hepatic steatosis	9.7 (2.2)	11.2 (2.7)	P < 0.001
US⁺ and ALT⁺	10.9 (2.5)	12.0 (2.9)	P < 0.001
LVEDD, M (SD)
No/one criterion for hepatic steatosis	50.9 (5.6)	48.8 (5.5)	P < 0.001
US⁺ and ALT⁺	52.4 (5.9)	50.6 (5.3)	P < 0.001
PWD, M (SD)
No/one criterion for hepatic steatosis	9.6 (1.9)	9.9 (1.9)	P < 0.001
US⁺ and ALT⁺	10.4 (2.0)	10.9 (2.1)	P < 0.01
LVM (g), M (SD)
No/one criterion for hepatic steatosis	181.8 (53.5)	192.2 (56.8)	P < 0.001
US⁺ and ALT⁺	215.8 (61.3)	226.1 (62.4)	P < 0.01
LVMI (g/m^2.7), M(SD)
No/one criterion for hepatic steatosis	46.2 (13.3)	49.2 (14.6)	P < 0.001
US⁺ and ALT⁺	51.0 (13.7)	53.7 (14.4)	P < 0.01
SBP (mmHg), M (SD)
No/one criterion for hepatic steatosis	139.3 (20.2)	136.3 (19.2)	P < 0.001
US⁺ and ALT⁺	148.5 (17.4)	142.8 (19.0)	P < 0.001
DBP (mmHg), M (SD)
No/one criterion for hepatic steatosis	84.7 (10.8)	81.2 (10.3)	P < 0.001
US⁺ and ALT⁺	89.9 (10.4)	85.0 (11.1)	P < 0.001
LVH
No/one criterion for hepatic steatosis	499 (45.1)	597 (54.0)	P < 0.001
US⁺ and ALT⁺	114 (59.4)	128 (66.7)	P < 0.001
Hypertension
No/one criterion for hepatic steatosis	660 (59.7)	686 (62.0)	P < 0.001
US⁺ and ALT⁺	163 (84.9)	154 (80.2)	P < 0.001

IVS: Interventricular septum thickness; LVEDD: Left ventricular end diastolicdiameter; PWD: Posterior wall thickness; LVM: Left ventricular mass; LVMI: Left ventricular mass index; SBP: Systolic blood pressure; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure; LVH: Left ventricular hypertrophy; US: Ultrasound; ALT: Alanine aminotransferase.

Table 3 Bivariate Pearson correlations

	Sex	Age	FLD	LVMI_t0	LVMI_t1	SBP_t0	SBP_t1	DBP_t0
Sex
Age	-0.04
FLD	-0.23^b	-0.10^b
LVMI_t0	-0.12^b	0.30^b	0.13^b
LVMI_t1	-0.08^b	0.26^b	0.11^b	0.62^b
SBP_t0	-0.21^b	0.24^b	0.16^b	0.36^b	0.24^b
SBP_t1	-0.13^b	0.18^b	0.12^b	0.22^b	0.22^b	0.49^b
DBP_t0	-0.20^b	-0.14^b	0.17^b	0.19^b	0.11^b	0.71^b	0.32^b
DBP_t1	-0.15^b	-0.28^b	0.13^b	0.04	0.05	0.28^b	0.65^b	0.52^b

^bP < 0.01. FLD: Fatty liver disease; LVMI_t0: Left ventricular mass index at baseline; LVMI_t1: Left ventricular mass index at follow-up; SBP_t0: Systolic blood pressure at baseline; SBP_t1: Systolic blood pressure at follow-up; DBP_t0: Diastolic blood pressure at baseline; DBP_t1: Diastolic blood pressure at follow-up.

Citation: Piontek K, Schmidt CO, Baumeister SE, Lerch MM, Mayerle J, Dörr M, Felix SB, Völzke H. Is hepatic steatosis associated with left ventricular mass index increase in the general population? World J Hepatol 2017; 9(19): 857-866
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v9/i19/857.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v9.i19.857