Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Hepatol. Apr 28, 2017; 9(12): 603-612
Published online Apr 28, 2017. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i12.603
Published online Apr 28, 2017. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i12.603
Table 1 Demographics and clinical characteristics
Sub-maximally dilated | Maximally dilated | P value | |
Total patients | 43 | 230 | NA |
Male | 23 | 150 | 0.17 |
Female | 20 | 80 | |
Mean age (yr) | 56.5 ± 2.3 (range 10-83) | 54.5 ± 0.7 (range 20-81) | 0.29 |
Mean MELD | 13.6 ± 0.6 (range 6-25) | 13.5 ± 0.3 (range 6-28) | 0.82 |
Mean pre-TIPS PSG (mmHg) | 19.4 ± 6.8 (range 8-45) | 22.4 ± 7.1 (range 9-73) | 0.01 |
Median post-TIPS PSG (mmHg) | 8 (range 1-13) | 8 (range 2-20) | 0.13 |
Mean percent change in PSG (%) | 59.1 ± 15.9 (range 0-95) | 61.0 ± 12.4 (range 0-89) | 0.53 |
Table 2 Mean pre-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt portosystemic gradient and percent change in portosystemic gradient in patients with post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt portosystemic gradient above and below 12 mmHg
> 12 mmHg | ≤ 12 mmHg | P value | |
Mean pre-TIPS PSG (mmHg) | 33 ± 13.2 (range 20-73) | 21.1 ± 5.7 (range 8-53) | < 0.01 |
Mean percent change in PSG (%) | 48.3 ± 13.1 (range 30.8-82.2) | 61.6 ± 12.6 (range 0-95) | < 0.01 |
Table 3 Measurements of 8 mm transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt stents on computed tomography imaging follow-up
Median diameter (mm) | Median percent diameter change | Median area (mm2) | Median percent area change | |
< 6 mo (n = 7) | 8.05 (range 7.84-8.43) | 0.67% | 50.94 | 1.34% |
> 6 mo (n = 7) | 8.45 (range 8.23-8.72) | 5.58% | 56.04 | 11.48% |
P-value | 0.01 | 0.01% | 0.01 | 0.01% |
Table 4 Clinical Success of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt n (%)
Sub-maximally dilated | Maximally dilated | P value | |
Complete Clinical Success of TIPS for Ascites | |||
Yes | 9 (64) | 63 (64) | 1 |
No | 5 (36) | 35 (36) | |
Partial Clinical Success of TIPS for Ascites | |||
Yes | 11 (79) | 89 (91) | 0.17 |
No | 3 (21) | 9 (9) | |
Clinical Success of TIPS for Varices | |||
Yes | 7 (78) | 64 (85) | 0.62 |
No | 2 (22) | 11 (15) |
Table 5 Severe post- transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt hepatic encephalopathy n (%)
Severe post-TIPS HE | Sub-maximally dilated | Maximally dilated | P value |
Yes | 4 (7) | 6 (3) | 0.12 |
No | 51 (93) | 212 (97) |
Table 6 Model for End-Stage Liver Disease and post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt portosystemic gradient for patients with and without severe post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt hepatic encephalopathy
Mean MELD with HE | Mean MELD without HE | P value | Median post-TIPS PSG with HE (mmHg) | Median post-TIPS PSG without HE (mmHg) | P value | |
Sub-maximally dilated | 13.3 ± 2.9 (range 11-17) | 13.7 ± 4.3 (range 6-25) | 0.85 | 7.5 (range 6-8) | 8 (range 1-13) | 0.67 |
Maximally dilated | 15.8 ± 4.3 (range 12-24) | 13.4 ± 4.1 (range 6-28) | 0.16 | 10 (range 4-11) | 8 (range 2-20) | 0.36 |
- Citation: Hsu MC, Weber CN, Stavropoulos SW, Clark TW, Trerotola SO, Shlansky-Goldberg RD, Soulen MC, Nadolski GJ. Passive expansion of sub-maximally dilated transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts and assessment of clinical outcomes. World J Hepatol 2017; 9(12): 603-612
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v9/i12/603.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v9.i12.603