Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Hepatol. Jan 8, 2017; 9(1): 38-47
Published online Jan 8, 2017. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i1.38
Table 1 Summary illustrating sample size calculation above
AUROCTotal (n)% Positive# Positive# NegativeSEConfidence interval
LowerUpper
0.81103033770.0500.7010.899
0.81303039910.0460.7090.891
Table 2 Summary of liver disease scores by histology fibrosis score (discrete variables) n (%)
Histology fibrosis scores
Totalχ2
0 (n = 61)1 (n = 20)2 (n = 20)3 (n = 10)4 (n = 17)(n = 128)P value
Elastography fibrosis score
F051 (83.6)7 (35.0)5 (25.0)0 (0.0)1 (5.9)64 (50.0)< 0.0001
F110 (16.4)10 (50.0)2 (10.0)2 (20.0)1 (5.9)25 (19.5)
F20 (0.0)3 (15.0)9 (45.0)1 (10.0)0 (0.0)13 (10.2)
F30 (0.0)0 (0.0)3 (15.0)7 (70.0)1 (5.9)11 (8.6)
F40 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (5.0)0 (0.0)14 (82.4)15 (11.7)
APRI fibrosis score
045 (73.8)6 (30.0)6 (30.0)1 (10.0)1 (5.9)59 (46.1)< 0.0001
1 to 314 (23.0)13 (65.0)9 (45.0)9 (90.0)8 (47.1)53 (41.4)
42 (3.3)1 (5.0)5 (25.0)0 (0.0)8 (47.1)16 (12.5)
Steatosis
Grade 048 (78.7)8 (40.0)2 (10.0)1 (10.0)4 (23.5)63 (49.2)< 0.0001
Grade 16 (9.8)8 (40.0)5 (25.0)1 (10.0)1 (5.9)21 (16.4)
Grade 26 (9.8)2 (10.0)7 (35.0)4 (40.0)0 (0.0)19 (14.8)
Grade 31 (1.6)2 (10.0)6 (30.0)4 (40.0)12 (70.6)25 (19.5)
Table 3 Shear wave elastography median and aminotransferase platelet ratio index score to differentiate between metavir subgroups
F0-3 vs F4F0-2 vs F3-4F0-1 vs F2-4F0 vs F1-4
SWE medianP value< 0.0001< 0.0001< 0.0001< 0.0001
OR1.7081.7892.9832.683
95%CI1.379, 2.1151.432, 2.2361.839, 4.8381.789, 4.025
AUROC0.9260.9290.9080.879
APRI scoreP value0.02020.0390.00050.0008
OR1.5111.4043.4824.651
95%CI1.067, 2.1411.018, 1.9381.727, 7.0181.895, 11.416
AUROC0.8120.7840.7800.803
SWE and APRI1AUROC0.9270.9310.9200.890
APRI influence0.0010.0020.0120.011
Table 4 Prediction of histology fibrosis score (Grouping: F0-1 vs F2-4) using elastography median, aminotransferase platelet ratio index score, age category1, sex and steatosis maximum likelihood and odds ratio estimates
VariableDFCoefficient estimateStandard errorWald χ2Pr > χ2OR estimateLower 95%CI limit for ORUpper 95%CI limit for OR
Intercept1-6.64821.351024.2158< 0.0001
Age categoryLE median10.09710.32190.09100.76291.2140.3444.288
APRI score10.19460.38730.25260.61531.2150.5692.595
Elastography median10.90410.251312.94640.00032.4701.5094.042
SexFemale10.33300.35510.87970.34831.9470.4847.830
Steatosis11.13170.346210.68430.00113.1011.5736.112
Table 5 Significance of predictive values associated with key pre-identified variables
F0-3 vs F4F0-2 vs F3-4F0-1 vs F2-4F0 vs F1-4
SWE median< 0.0001< 0.00010.00030.0002
APRI scoreNS10.0404NSNS
AgeNSNSNSNS
GenderNSNSNSNS
SteatosisNS0.02630.00020.0007
AUROC0.9260.9620.9440.902
Table 6 Elastography median and steatosis
VariablePr > χ2OR estimateLower 95%CI limit for ORUpper 95%CI limit for OR
F0-3 vs F4
Intercept< 0.0001
Elastography median< 0.00011.6811.3472.099
Steatosis0.65291.1870.5632.502
AUROC = 0.936
F0-2 vs F3-4
Intercept< 0.0001
Elastography median< 0.00011.6841.3532.097
Steatosis0.05681.8460.9823.467
AUROC = 0.954
F0-1 vs F2-4
Intercept< 0.0001
Elastography median0.00032.3971.5003.828
Steatosis0.00023.1351.7035.772
AUROC = 0.944
F0 vs F1-4
Intercept< 0.0001
Elastography median0.00022.2211.4633.370
Steatosis0.00072.4961.4734.230
AUROC = 0.902