Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Hepatol. Dec 28, 2016; 8(36): 1629-1636
Published online Dec 28, 2016. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i36.1629
Table 1 Demographic characteristics
Age (yr)
Mean ± SD40.5 ± 19.1
Median37
Gender (#)
Men24
Women76
Age by gender (yr)
Men
Mean ± SD50.0 ± 17.0
Median49
Women
Mean ± SD37.4 ± 18.8
Median31.5
Cholelithiasis known previously (from history)
Yes47
No53
Table 2 Clinical features, n (%)
Pain location
RUQ41 (42.3)
Epigastric43 (44.3)
RUQ and/or epigastric + other region6 (6.2)
Not RUQ or epigastric7 (7.3)
No data3
Fever
Yes2 (2.1)
No95 (97.9)
No data3
Nausea
Yes28 (60.9)
No18 (39.1)
No data54
Vomiting
Yes20 (31.7)
No43 (68.3)
No data37
Tenderness to palpation
RUQ47 (49.0)
Epigastric20 (20.8)
Table 3 Ultrasound findings
Frequency
Non contributory64
Contracted gallbladder2
Cholelithiasis58
Contracted gallbladder + cholelithiasis4
Compatible or highly suggestive35
Dilated CBD5
Dilated CBD + filling defect1
Thickened gallbladder wall6
Distended gallbladder + cholelithiasis13
Distended gallbladder2
Stone in cystic duct4
Distended gallbladder + pericystic fluid2
Thickened gallbladder wall + cholelithiasis2
Total valid99
Missing1
Total100