Clinical Trials Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Hepatol. Jul 18, 2016; 8(20): 850-857
Published online Jul 18, 2016. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i20.850
Table 1 Characteristics of the 81 patients treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt + stomach and esophageal variceal embolization
No. of patients81 (%)
Men63 (77.8)
Female9 (22.2)
Age (yr)
Mean ± SD50.9 ± 10.9
Range25-76
Cause of liver diseasen (%)
Viral61 (75.4)
Alcoholic7 (8.7)
Viral and alcoholic1 (1.2)
Primary biliary cirrhosis4 (4.9)
Autoimmune hepatitis1 (1.2)
Cryptogenic7 (8.6)
Child-Pugh classn (%)
A15 (18.5)
B47 (58.0)
C19 (23.5)
Endoscopic findings
IGV125 (30.9)
GOV110 (12.3)
GOV246 (56.8)
Pre-PPG (mmHg)
Mean ± SD38.0 ± 6.4
Range26.0-48.0
Follow-up (mo)
Mean ± SD7.87 ± 5.57
Range1-18
Table 2 Comparison of main biochemical data and portosystemic pressure gradient before and after the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt + stomach and esophageal variceal embolization
Before TIPSAfter TIPSP
Albumin (mg/dL)32.24 ± 5.8833.90 ± 7.260.199
ALT (u/L)30.00 ± 17.5130.85 ± 20.600.806
AST (u/L)38.00 ± 25.9541.88 ± 24.030.318
Bilirubin (mg/dL)1.41 ± 0.761.45 ± 0.650.561
PT (%)52 ± 1451 ± 150.903
Creatinine (mg/dL)1 ± 0.31 ± 0.40.58
Child-Pugh score6.91 ± 1.446.79 ± 1.340.563
PPG (mmHg)38.0 ± 6.428.2 ± 6.5< 0.001