Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Hepatol. Apr 8, 2015; 7(4): 673-687
Published online Apr 8, 2015. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i4.673
Published online Apr 8, 2015. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i4.673
Ref. | Study design | Patients, n | Overall survival, mo |
Zhu et al[109] (SEARCH trial) | Sorafenib vs sorafenib + erlotinib | 358 vs 362 | Sorafenib: 8.5 Sorafenib + erlotinib: 9.5 |
Cheng et al[105] (SUN1170 trial) | Sorafenib vs sunitinib | 544 vs 530 | Sorafenib: 10.2 Sunitinib: 7.9 |
Cainap et al[106] (LIGHT trial) | Sorafenib vs linifanib | 517 vs 518 | Sorafenib: 9.8 Linifanib: 9.1 |
Johnson et al[107] (BRISK-FL trial) | Sorafenib vs brivanib | 578 vs 577 | Sorafenib: 9.9 Brivanib: 9.5 |
Llovet et al[108] (BRISK-PS trial) | Brivanib vs placebo | 263 vs 132 | Brivanib: 9.4 Placebo: 8.3 |
Ref. | Study design | Timing of sorafenib | Patients, n | BCLC stage | Child-Pugh class | Primary endpoint results |
Kudo et al[155] | Sorafenib + TACE vs TACE | Sequential | 229 vs 229 | B | A | TTP (5.4 mo vs 3.7 mo) |
Lencioni et al[151] (SPACE trial) | Sorafenib + DEB-TACE vs DEB-TACE + placebo | Continuous | 154 vs 153 | B | A | TTP (169 d vs 166 d; P = 0.072) |
Martin et al[158] | Sorafenib + DEB-TACE vs DEB-TACE | NR | 30 vs 120 | B, C | B | OS (12 mo vs 10 mo) |
Sansonno et al[154] | Sorafenib + TACE vs TACE | Sequential | 40 vs 40 | B | A | TTP (9.2 mo vs 4.9 mo) |
Han et al[156] (subgroup analysis of START) | Sorafenib + TACE | Sequential | 63 | A, B, C | A | TTP (10.6 mo) OS (16.5 mo) |
Chung et al[150] (subgroup analysis of START) | Sorafenib + TACE | Sequential | 63 | A, B, C | A | DCR (52%) |
Park et al[149] (COTSUN Korea) | Sorafenib + TACE | Interrupted | 50 | B, C | A, B | TTP (7.1 mo) PFS (52% at 6 mo) |
Pawlik et al[148] | Sorafenib + DEB-TACE | Continuous | 35 | B, C | A, B | DCR (95%) OR (58%) |
Cabrera et al[153] | Sorafenib + DEB-TACE or Y-90 | Continuous | 47 | B, C | A, B | At 6 mo DCR (68%) OS (8.5 mo) |
Ref. | Chemotherapeutic agent | Type of study | Patients, n | Median OS, mo | DCR, % | Median PFS, mo |
Abou-Alfa et al[160] | Doxorubicin | Multicenter randomized prospective phase II | 47 vs 49 | 13.7 vs 6.5 | 62 | 6.0 vs 2.7 |
Hsu et al[166] | Tegafur/uracil | Prospective phase II | 53 | 7.4 | 57 | 3.7 |
Prete et al[161] | Long-acting octreotide | Prospective phase II | 50 | 12 | 76 | 7 |
Abou-Alfa et al[165] | PR-104 | Prospective phase I | 14 | NR | 50 | NR |
Lee et al[164] | S-1 fluoropyrimidines | Prospective phase I | 20 | 10.4 | 52.9 | 3.9 |
Petrini et al[163] | 5-Fluorouracil | Prospective phase II | 39 | 13.7 | 48.7 | 7.5 |
- Citation: Gomaa AI, Waked I. Recent advances in multidisciplinary management of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol 2015; 7(4): 673-687
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v7/i4/673.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v7.i4.673