Minireviews
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Hepatol. Oct 27, 2014; 6(10): 745-751
Published online Oct 27, 2014. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v6.i10.745
Table 1 Comparison between the modified grading system and the Clavien-Dindo classification
Modified gradesClavien-Dindo classification
Grade AGradeIAny deviation from the normal postoperative course that did not require special treatment
Grade IICases requiring pharmacological treatment
Grade BGrade IIIaCases requiring surgical or radiological interventions without general anesthesia
Grade CGrade IIIbCases requiring surgical or radiological interventions performed under general anesthesia
Grade IVaLife-threatening complications involving single organ dysfunction
Grade DGrade IVbLife-threatening complications involving multiple organ dysfunction
Grade VCases that resulted in death
Table 2 Grading system and representative management strategies for post-hepatectomy liver failure
GradesDefinitionManagement strategies
Grade ANo change in the patient’s clinical management strategy required or manageable with medicationDiuretics, selective digestive decontamination, lactulose, glucagon-insulin therapy, stronger neo-minophagen C
Grade BManageable without invasive treatmentFFP transfusion, hyperbaric oxygen therapy
Grade CInvasive treatment requiredPlasma exchange, artificial liver support, surgery (including liver transplantation)
Table 3 Grading system and representative management strategies for bile leakage
GradesDefinitionManagement strategies
Grade ANo change in the patient’s clinical management strategy required or manageable with simple drainageDrainage within 7 d Antibiotic administration
Grade BManageable with interventional proceduresDrainage for 7 or more day, ethanol injection, fibrin paste injection, single ENBD, single EBD, single PTBD, PTPE, TAE
Grade CCases involving pneumoperitoneum, inflammation, multiple organ failure, or reoperationComplicated IVR (combinations with any Grade Bs) Reoperation
Table 4 Grading system and representative management strategies for acute renal failure
GradesDefinitionManagement strategies
Grade AIncrease in serum creatinine level of ≥ 0.3 mg/dL from the baseline or 1.5 to 2-fold increase from the baselineDehydration
Urinary output of less than 0.5 mL/kg per hour for more than 6 hDiuretics
Grade BTwo-fold increase in the serum creatinine level from the baselineContinuous mannitol + diuretics
Urinary output of less than 0.5 mL/kg per hour for more than 12 h
Grade CDialysis treatment required (serum K > 6.0 mEq, BE < -10, uremia, hypouresis that lasts for more than three days)Hemodialysis
Table 5 Grading system and representative management strategies for ascites
GradesDefinition in International Ascites Club (2003)Definition in International Ascites Club (1996)
Grade ADetected only on United StatesMild
Grade BModerate symmetrical distention of the abdomenModerate
Grade CMarked abdominal distentionMassive or tense
Table 6 Grading system and representative management strategies for ascites
GradesDefinitionManagement strategies
Grade ARequiring any changes in the clinical management strategy or manageable with medicationDiuretics, sodium restriction
Ascites discharge < 1000 mL/d in the drainage case
Grade BGrade A ascites that lasts for more than 2 wk or requires peritoneal puncturePeritoneal puncture
Ascites discharge < 2000 mL/d in the drainage case
Grade CInvasive treatment requiredDenver peritoneovenous shunt, TIPS, PSE, splenectomy
Table 7 Grading system for superficial SSI and wound dehiscence
GradesDefinitionsManagement strategies
Grade AManageable within 2 wkSmall open wound, outpatient service
Grade BRequiring any management 2 wk and moreLarge open wound, inpatient service
Grade CAny management required under general anesthesia
Table 8 Grading system for deep and organ/space surgical site infections
GradesDefinitionsManagement strategies
Grade AManageable without requiring any additional perioperative management within 2 wkAntibiotics, simple drainage
Grade BRequiring any management 2 wk and moreAdditional drainage, irrigation
Grade CAny management required under general anesthesia
Table 9 Grading system and representative management strategies for coagulation disorders
GradesDefinitionManagements
Grade ADoes not require any change in the clinical management strategyVitamin K, ATIII, LMWH, SPI, UFH, and DS
Plat < 10 × 104 (preoperative Plat was within normal range)
30% reduction in Plat (preoperative Plat was abnormal)
Grade BMedication required for more than 5 dPlatelet transfusion
Plat < 5 × 104 (preoperative Plat was within normal range)
60% reduction in Plat (preoperative Plat was abnormal)
Grade CIntensive care treatment required and involved the failure of other organs
Table 10 Grading system and representative management strategies for pneumonia and respiratory disorder
GradesDefinitionManagements
Grade AMeet SIRS criteria with imaging findings in less than 50% of the lung field or PaO2/FiO2 < 300Antibiotics and oxygen
Sputum suction
Grade BMeet SIRS criteria with imaging findings in 50% and more of the lung field or PaO2/FiO2 < 200Antibiotics and oxygen, IPPV, NPPV, bronchoscopy for sputum suction
Grade CRequiring ventilator supportVentilator