Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Hepatol. Aug 27, 2025; 17(8): 108182
Published online Aug 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i8.108182
Table 1 Summary of key clinical trials and meta-analyses evaluating therapeutic interventions in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease
Study
Intervention
Population
Key findings
Ref.
PIVENS trialVitamin E, pioglitazone vs placeboNon-diabetic MASLD patientsVitamin E improved liver histologyChalasani et al[107], 2009
TONIC studyVitamin E and metforminPediatric MASLD patientsImproved hepatocellular ballooning and MASLD activity score; no improvement in ALT levelsLavine et al[99], 2011
FLINT trialObeticholic acidMASLD patientsReduced fibrosis progressionGao et al[91], 2011
European meta-analysisDietary and lifestyle modificationsMASLD and MASH patientsSignificant risk reduction with dietary interventionBuzzetti et al[77], 2021
Lancet meta-analysisLifestyle, pharmacological InterventionsMASLD patients (meta-analysis of 15 RCTs)Validated efficacy of lifestyle and pharmacological interventionsMózes et al[108], 2023
MAESTRO-NASH trialResmetirom (thyroid hormone receptor-β agonist)MASLD with liver fibrosis (phase 3 RCT)Promising reduction of hepatic fat and fibrosisHarrison et al[109], 2024
-MUFA vs SFA intakeMASLD patients with genetic stratificationMUFA may contribute to disease progressionXu et al[75], 2024
Semaglutide trial (NEJM)Semaglutide (GLP-1 receptor agonist)MASH patients with compensated cirrhosis (phase 3 RCT)Significant improvements in steatohepatitis and fibrosisSanyal et al[110], 2025