Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Hepatol. Jul 27, 2025; 17(7): 106151
Published online Jul 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i7.106151
Table 1 Comparative analysis of Rac family small GTPase 3 protein expression in hepatocellular carcinoma tissues and paired adjacent non-tumorous liver tissues, n (%)
Group
Number
Rac family small GTPase 3 expression
χ2
P value
Low
High
HCC tissues10839 (36.1)69 (63.9)28.4< 0.001
Non-HCC tissues10878 (72.2)30 (27.8)
Table 2 Association between Rac family small GTPase 3 protein immunoreactivity and clinicopathological characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma using an in-house developed immunohistochemistry assay
Clinicopathological parametersNumberRac family small GTPase 3 expression
χ2P value
High
Low
Age (years)
≥ 606917520.6450.422
< 6039732
Gender
Male9362312.2390.135
Female1578
Pathologic grade
I-II272163.0100.083
III-IV814833
Clinical stage
I-II10264381.0410.308
III-IV651
Capsular invasion
Yes7653233.8020.051
No321616
Microvascular invasion
Yes4125160.2430.622
No674423
Satellite nodule
Yes11474.0220.045
No976532
Liver cirrhosis
Yes6539261.0700.301
No433013
Alpha-fetoprotein
≥ 8.78 ng/mL6939304.4950.034
< 8.78 ng/mL39309
Hepatitis B virus
Yes9559361.0880.297
No13103
Table 3 Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses of overall survival-associated factors in The Cancer Genome Atlas liver hepatocellular carcinoma cohort
VariablesUnivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR
95%CI
P value
HR
95%CI
P value
Age1.6091.040-2.4910.0331.5640.997-2.4530.051
Gender0.7580.496-1.1580.2000.8550.549-1.3320.488
Pathologic stage1.1340.749-1.7170.5531.0370.686-1.5680.862
Clinical stage0.9250.606-1.4110.7170.9520.629-1.4410.815
New tumor event after initial treatment1.0580.686-1.6300.7991.0970.707-1.7040.679
Rac family small GTPase 32.2541.460-3.480< 0.0012.2201.428-3.451< 0.001