Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Hepatol. May 27, 2022; 14(5): 992-1005
Published online May 27, 2022. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i5.992
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients and treatment
Baseline characteristic
n = 87
Age (IQR, yr)63.5 (26.0-68.0)
Sex, n (%) Male55 (63.2)
Female32 (36.8)
ASA-PS, n (%)124 (27.6)
244 (50.6)
319 (21.8)
Primary disease, n (%)Pancreatic cancer58 (66.7)
Bile duct cancer9 (10.3)
Gallbladder cancer2 (2.3)
Ampullary cancer2 (2.3)
Duodenal cancer2 (2.3)
Other cancers14 (16.1)
Clinical stage, n (%)II3 (3.5)
III9 (10.3)
IV75 (86.2)
Chemotherapy, n (%)Yes48 (55.2)
Radiotherapy, n (%)Yes11 (12.6)
Total bilirubin level (IQR, mg/dL)3.8 (2.1-7.7)
Length of stricture (IQR, mm)31.5 (21.8-39.3)
Total procedure time (IQR, min)32.0 (24.5-48.5)
EST, n (%)Yes60 (69.0)
CSEMS type (1), n (%)Partially38 (43.7)
Fully49 (56.3)
CSEMS type (2), n (%)Laser-cut6 (6.9)
Braided81(93.1)
Length of CSEMS (cm), n (%)43 (3.5)
51 (1.1)
644 (50.6)
710 (11.5)
829 (33.3)
Diameter of CSEMS (mm), n (%)63 (3.5)
83 (3.5)
1081 (93.0)
Angle of CSEMS (IQR, °)146.0 (134.5-156.5)
Table 2 Short- and long-term results, adverse events, cause of recurrent biliary obstruction, and reintervention
Classification
n (%)
n = 87
Technical success87 (100.0)
Functional success72 (82.8)
Adverse event9 (10.3)
Pancreatitis9 (10.3)
Severe1 (1.2)
Moderate5 (5.7)
Mild3 (3.4)
Cholangitis0 (0.0)
Cholecystitis0 (0.0)
Other complications0 (0.0)
n = 18
RBO18 (100.0)
Sludge formation or food impaction11 (61.1)
Tumor overgrowth5 (27.8)
Migration2 (11.1)
Tumor ingrowth0 (0.0)
Reintervention18 (100.0)
Metallic stent9 (50.0)
Sweep5 (27.8)
Plastic stent3 (16.7)
Not success1 (5.5)
Table 3 Baseline characteristics of patients and treatment (recurrent biliary obstruction group vs non-recurrent biliary obstruction group)


RBO group (n = 18)
Non-RBO group (n = 69)
P value
Age (IQR, yr)66.5 (61-77)69 (63.5-77)0.63
Sex, n (%) Female5 (27.8)27 (39.1)0.42
Male13 (72.2)42 (60.9)
ASA-PS, n (%) 12 (11.1)22 (31.9)0.07
29 (50.0)35 (50.7)
37 (38.9)12 (17.4)
Primary disease, n (%)Other cancers8 (44.4)21 (30.4)0.28
Pancreatic cancer10 (55.6)48 (69.6)
Clinical stage, n (%) II1 (5.6)2 (2.9)0.08
III4 (22.2)4 (5.8)
IV13 (72.2)63 (89.9)
Chemotherapy, n (%) No8 (44.4)31 (44.9)1.00
Yes10 (55.6)38 (55.1)
Radiotherapy, n (%) No17 (94.4)59 (85.5)0.45
Yes1 (5.6)10 (14.5)
Total bilirubin level (continuous, mg/dL)2.7 (1.1-6.7)4.4 (2.3-9.0)0.07
Length of stricture (IQR, mm)34.9 (25.9-47.2)30.9 (21.4-37.8)0.13
Total procedure time (IQR, min)35.5 (25-50.8)32.0 (24-47)0.65
EST, n (%) No5 (27.8)22 (31.9)1.00
Yes13 (72.2)47 (68.1)
CSEMS type (1), n (%) Partially9 (50.0)29 (42.0)0.60
Fully9 (50.0)40 (58.0)
CSEMS type (2), n (%) Laser-cut1 (5.6)5 (7.2)1.00
Braided17 (94.4)64 (92.8)
Length of CSEMS, n (%) ≤ 6 cm8 (44.4)40 (58.0)0.55
7 cm3 (16.7)7 (10.2)
8 cm7 (38.9)22 (31.9)
Diameter of CSEMS, n (%) 6 mm0 (0.0)3 (4.4)0.58
8 mm1 (5.6)2 (2.9)
10 mm17 (94.4)64 (92.8)
Angle of CSEMS (IQR, °)135.5 (114.8-149.3)149.0 (138.5-158)0.01
Table 4 Risk factors for recurrent biliary obstruction following covered self-expandable metallic stent placement by Cox proportional hazards analysis
nCase (%)Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
Unadjusted HR (95%CI)
P value
Adjusted HR (95%CI)
P value
Age (continuous, yr)8718 (20.7)1.00 (0.95-1.04)0.91
SexFemale325 (15.6)1.00
Male5513 (23.6)1.44 (0.51-4.05)0.49
ASA-PS 1242 (8.3)1.00
2449 (20.5)2.59 (0.56-12.00)0.23
3197 (36.8)5.12 (1.06-24.81)0.041.76 (0.85-3.62)0.13
Primary diseaseOthers298 (27.6)1.00
Pancreatic cancer5810 (17.2)0.80 (0.31-2.05)0.64
Clinical stageII31 (33.3)1.00
III84 (50.0)2.34 (0.26-21.22)0.45
IV7613 (17.1)0.79 (0.10-6.18)0.82
ChemotherapyNo398 (20.5)1.00
Yes4810 (20.8)1.13 (0.44-2.88)0.801.02 (0.40-2.61)0.97
RadiotherapyNo7617 (22.4)1.00
Yes111 (9.1)0.43 (0.06-3.24)0.41
Total bilirubin level (continuous, mg/dL)8718 (20.7)1.01 (0.99-1.03)0.26
Length of stricture (continuous, mm)8718 (20.7)1.03 (1.00-1.07)0.10
Total procedure time (continuous, min)8718 (20.7)1.00 (0.98-1.03)0.75
ESTNo275 (18.5)1.00
Yes6013 (21.7)1.19 (0.42-3.35)0.75
CSEMS type (1)Partially389 (23.7)1.00
Fully499 (18.4)0.85 (0.34-2.15)0.73
CSEMS type (2)Laser-cut61 (16.7)1.00
Braided8117 (21.0)1.27 (0.17-9.73)0.82
Length of CSEMS≤ 6 cm488 (16.7)1.00
7 cm103 (30.0)2.33 (0.61-8.89)0.22
8 cm297 (24.1)1.63 (0.64-4.14)0.45
Diameter of CSEMS< 10 mm61 (16.7)1.00
≥ 10 mm8117 (21.0)1.37 (0.18-10.47)0.76
Angle of CSEMS (continuous, per 10°)8718 (20.7)0.67 (0.51-0.87)< 0.010.71 (0.54-0.92)0.01
Table 5 Details of patients who had recurrent biliary obstruction following covered self-expandable metallic stenting (< 130° group vs ≥ 130° group)

< 130° group
≥ 130° group
P value
n = 16n = 71
RBO, n (%)7 (43.5)11 (15.5)0.07
n = 7n = 11
Cause of RBO, n (%)7 (100.0)11 (100.0)
Sludge formation or food impaction 3 (42.9)8 (72.7)
Tumor overgrowth3 (42.9)2 (18.2)
Migration1 (14.2)1 (9.1)
Tumor ingrowth0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Elevated liver enzymes, n (%)6 (85.7)5 (45.5)

  • Citation: Tanoue K, Maruyama H, Ishikawa-Kakiya Y, Kinoshita Y, Hayashi K, Yamamura M, Ominami M, Nadatani Y, Fukunaga S, Otani K, Hosomi S, Tanaka F, Kamata N, Nagami Y, Taira K, Watanabe T, Fujiwara Y. Angle of covered self-expandable metallic stents after placement is a risk factor for recurrent biliary obstruction. World J Hepatol 2022; 14(5): 992-1005
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v14/i5/992.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v14.i5.992