Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Hepatol. May 27, 2022; 14(5): 866-884
Published online May 27, 2022. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i5.866
Published online May 27, 2022. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i5.866
Method | Advantages | Disadvantages | Ref. |
Blotting | |||
Southern blot | Specific detection of DNA sequences; Able to distinguish cccDNA from other viral DNA species; Reliable and reproducible | Complicated, time-consuming, and costly | [101-102] |
PCR-based methods | |||
Conventional qPCR | Simple, accurate, and sensitive; Suitable for high-throughput screening; Rapid and economical | Specificity is reduced if high concentration of rcDNA is present | [100,102] |
Semi-nested and nested qPCR | Sensitive and specific; Allows for cccDNA quantification | [100,102,104,106] | |
Competitive qPCR | Sensitive; Can readily distinguish cccDNA from rcDNA; Allows for cccDNA quantification | [100,102,107] | |
Droplet-digital PCR | Very sensitive and accurate; Can detect a single copy of cccDNA precisely; Allows for cccDNA quantification | [102,108-114] | |
Rolling circle amplification qPCR | Very sensitive; cccDNA is visible at single-cell resolution | Effective amplification may be hindered by cross-linked proteins or diffusion of DNA | [100,102,115-117] |
Magnetic capture hybridization PCR | Sensitive and specific; Allows for selective isolation of cccDNA; Reproducible | Unable to capture all cccDNA completely; Complicated and costly | [100,102,118-119] |
Invader Assay | Specific, simple, and reproducible | [100,102,121-124] | |
In situ hybridization | Specific; Can distinguish different types of nucleic acids; Visible at single-cell resolution | Complicated probe design | [100,102,125-126] |
Indirect method | |||
Surrogate markers | Non-invasive; Convenient and cost-effective; Suitable for high-throughput screening | Indirect | [100,114,126-128,131-135] |
Technique | Study model | Study results | Ref. |
Gene editing | |||
Synthetic RNAi | Clinical trial | ARC-520 was well tolerated, with only two serious adverse effects. ARC-520 was active in both HBeAg-neg and HBeAg-pos patients, but only moderate reduction in HBsAg was observed | [122] |
Zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) | In vitro (AAV-mediated delivery of ZFNs in HepAD38 cells) | Completely inhibited HBV DNA replication and decreased HBV pgRNA level | [124] |
In vitro | Decreased pgRNA level, thus having the potential to target cccDNA | [123] | |
Transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) | In vitro and in vivo [murine hydrodynamic injection (HDI)] | Efficient disruption of target sites and suppression of viral replication markers; targeted mutation in 35% of cccDNAs was observed in vitro under mildly hyphothermic conditions and further confirmed in vivo | [125] |
CRISPR/Cas9 System | In vitro (A64 cells) | Inhibited both HBV antigen expression and replication, excised the entire full-length of integrated HBV genome, and disrupted cccDNA | [126-131] |
Epigenetic modification | |||
Dicoumarol | In vitro (HBV-infected cells HepG2-NTCP cells) and in vivo (humanised liver mouse) | Reduced HBx protein expression, therefore having a potent antiviral activity against HBV RNAs, DNA, HBsAg, and HBc protein; cccDNA-ChIP decreased active histone marks and increased repressive histone marks | [132] |
In vitro (NTCP-expressing HepG2 and primary hepatocytes) | Inhibited HBV replication in HBV-infected primary human hepatocytes by inhibiting the activity of cccDNA | [133] | |
Interferon-alpha (IFN) | In vitro and in vivo (chimeric uPA/SCID mice) | Hypoacetylation of cccDNA-bound histone and active recruitment of transcriptional corepressors to the cccDNA; Inhibited HBV replication and cccDNA transcription | [134] |
In vitro | Induced a prolonged suppression of human and duck HBV cccDNA transcription | [135] | |
Zinc finger proteins (ZFPs) | In vitro (male longhorn hepatoma cells) | ZFPs binding to HBV enhancer region inhibited viral replication by inhibiting cccDNA transcriptional activity | [136] |
Curcumin | In vitro (HepG2.2.15) | Reduced HBsAg and cccDNA levels up to 58% and 76%, respectively | [137] |
- Citation: Bianca C, Sidhartha E, Tiribelli C, El-Khobar KE, Sukowati CHC. Role of hepatitis B virus in development of hepatocellular carcinoma: Focus on covalently closed circular DNA . World J Hepatol 2022; 14(5): 866-884
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v14/i5/866.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v14.i5.866