Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Hepatol. Oct 27, 2021; 13(10): 1405-1416
Published online Oct 27, 2021. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v13.i10.1405
Table 1 Descriptive categorical data for live-donor liver transplant recipients with biliary complications
Variable

n (%)
Indication of liver transplantationHCV21 (84)
HBV1 (4)
Combined HCV and HBV1 (4)
Hepatocellular carcinoma2 (8)
Donors’ genderMale17 (68)
Female8 (32)
Recipients’ genderMale19 (76)
Female6 (24)
ImmunosuppressantTacrolimus 22 (88)
Cyclosporine3 (12)
Biliary leakage-7 (28)
+18 (72)
Need of pigtail catheter for biloma (total = 18)-15 (83.3)
+3 (16.6)
Biliary infection -0 (0)
+25 (100)
Frequency of biliary infection (total = 25)1-2 Episodes16 (64)
≥ 3 Episodes9 (36)
Biliary stricture-5 (20)
+20 (80)
Frequency of biliary stricture (total = 20)1-2 Episodes13 (65)
≥ 3 Episodes7 (28)
Need for ERCP-5 (20)
+20 (80)
Frequency of ERCP1-2 ERCP13 (65)
≥ 3 ERCP7 (28)
Need for PTC-22 (88)
+3 (12)
Frequency of PTC1 PTC2 (66.6)
2 PTC1 (33.3)
Surgical intervention for stricture-19 (95)
+1 (5)
Admission related to biliary complications-0 (0)
+25 (100)
Early biliary infection (total = 25)-2 (8)
+23 (92)
Early biliary stricture (total = 20)-17 (68)
+8 (32)
Table 2 Descriptive numerical data for live-donor liver transplant recipients with biliary complications
Variable
Data
MELD score15 ± 3
Child score9 ± 2
Donors’ age (yr)30 ± 4
Donors’ BMI (kg/m2)25 ± 4
Recipient's age (yr)52 ± 7
Recipient's BMI (kg/m2)27 ± 6
Total bilirubin (mg/dL)2.9 (2-3.9)
Direct bilirubin (mg/dL)1.6 (0.9-2.3)
Alkaline phosphatase (IU/L)190 ± 49
Gamma-glutamyl transferase (IU/L)100 (50-130)
Platelets (109/L)75 ± 31
Cold ischemia time (min)48 ± 25
Warm ischemia time (min)47 ± 23
Graft arterialization time (min)145 ± 53
Time to biliary infection (d)13 (11-36)
Time to biliary stricture (d)130 (120-190)
Table 3 Comparison of the quality-of-life scores for live-donor liver transplant recipients with biliary complications and their corresponding norm-based scores
HRQoL score
LDLT-R with BC
NBS score
P value1
Physical functioning50 (50-75)41.3 (41.3-49.2)0.003
Role physical50 (31.3-75)40.5 (34.2-49)0.001
Bodily pain50 (50-75)39.7 (39.7-48.7)0.003
General health60 (60-85)47.8 (47.8-57.7)0.004
Vitality50 (25-50)49.1 (39.2-49.1)1.000
Social functioning50 (50-50)39.1 (39.1-39.1)0.005
Role emotion50 (37.5-75)35.5 (30.3-45.9)< 0.001
Mental health50 (50-62.5)41.3 (41.3-47)0.001
Table 4 Comparison of health-related quality-of-life scores between patients and controls
HRQoL domain
Patients (n = 25)
Controls (n = 25)
P value1
Physical functioning50 (50-75)100 (100-100)< 0.001
Role physical50 (31.3-75)100 (87.5-100)< 0.001
Bodily pain50 (50-75)100 (100-100)< 0.001
General health60 (60-85)85 (85-85)< 0.001
Vitality50 (25-50)75 (75-87.5)< 0.001
Social functioning50 (50-50)75 (75-100)< 0.001
Role emotion50.0 (37.5-75)87.5 (75-100)< 0.001
Mental health50 (50-62.5)87.5 (75-87.5)< 0.001
PCS44.8 (41.7-52.9)57.8 (55.2-59)< 0.001
MCS42 (35.6-45.2)52.9 (50.2-57.9)< 0.001
Table 5 Physical and mental component summary scores in patients and controls compared with norm-based scores
Variable
NBS
Patients (n = 25), %
Control (n = 25) , %
P value1
Physical component summary scoreAt or above11 (44)25 (100)0.0002
Below8 (32)0 (0)
Far below6 (24)0 (0)
Mental component summary scoreAt or above7 (28)24 (96)< 0.0001
Below7 (28)1 (4)
Far below11 (44)0 (0)