Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Hepatol. Nov 27, 2020; 12(11): 1004-1019
Published online Nov 27, 2020. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i11.1004
Published online Nov 27, 2020. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i11.1004
Table 1 Sample characteristics, n = 379
Variables | n = 379 |
Gender, n (%) | |
Male | 78 (20.6) |
Female | 301 (79.4) |
Age in yr, mean ± SD | 39.1 ± 10.6 |
Weight in kg, mean ± SD | 123.7 ± 24.8 |
Minimum | 77 |
Maximum | 235 |
BMI in kg/m2, mean ± SD | 45.9 ± 7.5 |
BMI classification, n (%) | |
30-34.99 kg/m² | 3 (0.8) |
35-39.99 kg/m² | 82 (21.6) |
40-49.99 kg/m² | 210 (55.4) |
50 kg/m² or more | 84 (22.2) |
SMM in kg, mean ± SD | 34.1 ± 7.5 |
BCM in kg, mean ± SD | 39.4 ± 8.3 |
Fat mass in kg, mean ± SD | 62.6 ± 15.1 |
% Fat-mean ± SD | 50.7 ± 4.6 |
Visceral fat area in cm², mean ± SD | 243.7 ± 31.2 |
Phase angle °, mean ± SD | |
Full-body | 5.89 ± 0.62 |
RA | 5.58 ± 0.62 |
LA | 5.42 ± 0.65 |
Tr | 7.97 ± 1.18 |
RL | 6.14 ± 0.81 |
LL | 6.07 ± 0.84 |
Table 2 Sample characteristics for liver disease, n = 379
Variables | n (%) |
NAFLD | |
Yes | 379 (100.0) |
No | 0 (0.0) |
Hepatic steatosis | |
Absent | 0 (0.0) |
Discreet | 159 (42.0) |
Moderate | 104 (27.4) |
Accented | 84 (22.2) |
Massive | 32 (8.4) |
Ballooning | |
Absent | 91 (24.0) |
Discreet | 221 (58.3) |
Moderate | 18 (4.7) |
Accented | 49 12.9) |
Massive | 0 (0.0) |
Lobular inflammation | |
Absent | 243 (64.1) |
Discreet | 100 (26.4) |
Moderate | 28 (7.4) |
Accented | 8 (2.1) |
Massive | 0 (0.0) |
NASH | |
Absent | 83 (21.9) |
Grade 1 | 201 (53.0) |
Grade 2 | 67 (17.7) |
Grade 3 | 28 (7.4) |
Grade 4 | 0 (0.0) |
Absent | 216 (57.0) |
Grade 1 | 86 (22.7) |
Grade 2 | 44 (11.6) |
Grade 3 | 33 (8.7) |
Grade 4 | 0 (0.0) |
Cirrhosis | |
Yes | 0 (0.0) |
No | 379 (100.0) |
Table 3 Variation of body composition before and after bariatric surgery, n = 379
Variables | Pre | Post | P value |
mean ± SD | mean ± SD | ||
BMI in kg/m² | 45.9 ± 7.5 | 31.2 ± 5.0 | < 0.001 |
SMM in kg | 34.1 ± 7.5 | 29.0 ± 6.4 | < 0.001 |
BCM in kg | 39.4 ± 8.3 | 33.9 ± 6.9 | < 0.001 |
Fat mass in kg | 62.6 ± 15.1 | 31.9 ± 11.1 | < 0.001 |
% Fat | 50.7 ± 4.6 | 37.2 ± 8.1 | < 0.001 |
Visceral fat area in cm² | 243.7 ± 31.2 | 152.0 ± 51.0 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Association of body composition variables with phase angle in men and women, using Pearson’s correlation coefficient, n = 379
Variables | Weight in kg | SMM in kg | BCM in kg | Fat mass in kg | % Fat | Visceral fat area in cm² |
Male gender, n = 78 | ||||||
PA full body | -0.418c | -0.118 | -0.101 | -0.469c | -0.401c | -0.075 |
PA RA | -0.299b | -0.083 | -0.064 | -0.337b | -0.287a | -0.095 |
PA LA | -0.286a | -0.031 | -0.008 | -0.349b | -0.341b | -0.136 |
PA Tr | -0.074 | 0.074 | 0.094 | -0.134 | -0.185 | 0.311b |
PA RL | -0.493c | -0.179 | -0.170 | -0.531c | -0.421c | -0.101 |
PA LL | -0.509c | -0.211 | -0.209 | -0.534c | -0.403c | -0.066 |
Female gender, n = 301 | ||||||
PA full body | -0.106 | 0.125a | 0.122b | -0.152b | -0.393c | -0.098 |
PA RA | 0.011 | 0.169b | 0.148a | -0.036 | -0.245c | -0.111 |
PA LA | 0.043 | 0.193b | 0.155b | -0.009 | -0.226c | -0.135a |
PA Tr | 0.024 | 0.120a | 0.133a | -0.030 | -0.172b | -0.058 |
PA RL | -0.154b | 0.083 | 0.068 | -0.182b | -0.406c | -0.043 |
PA LL | -0.151b | 0.069 | 0.052 | -0.187b | -0.388c | -0.086 |
Table 5 Variation of phase angle in the pre- and postoperative period of bariatric surgery, n = 169
Variables | Pre | Post | P value |
mean ± SD | mean ± SD | ||
PA full body | 5.92 ± 0.55 | 4.98 ± 0.55 | < 0.001 |
PA RA | 5.58 ± 0.60 | 4.73 ± 0.59 | < 0.001 |
PA LA | 5.42 ± 0.63 | 4.54 ± 0.57 | < 0.001 |
PA Tr | 7.87 ± 1.15 | 6.76 ± 1.29 | < 0.001 |
PA RL | 6.25 ± 0.66 | 5.19 ± 0.65 | < 0.001 |
PA LL | 6.18 ± 0.70 | 5.14 ± 0.66 | < 0.001 |
Table 6 Association of body mass index with phase angle through Pearson correlation, n = 169
Variables | BMI | |
r | P value | |
PA full body | -0.121 | 0.018 |
PA RA | 0.031 | 0.551 |
PA LA | 0.057 | 0.265 |
PA Tr | 0.054 | 0.298 |
PA RL | -0.262 | < 0.001 |
PA LL | -0.262 | < 0.001 |
Table 7 Degrees and staging of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease before and after bariatric surgery, n = 33
Variables | Pre | Post | P value |
n (%) | n (%) | ||
NAFLD | 0.031 | ||
Yes | 33 (100) | 27 (81.8) | |
No | 0 (0.0) | 6 (18.2) | |
Hepatic steatosis | < 0.001 | ||
Absent | 0 (0.0) | 6 (18.2) | |
Discreet | 14 (42.4) | 24 (72.7) | |
Moderate | 8 (24.2) | 3 (9.1) | |
Accented | 8 (24.2) | 0 (0.0) | |
Massive | 3 (9.1) | 0 (0.0) | |
Ballooning | < 0.001 | ||
Absent | 5 (15.2) | 29 (87.9) | |
Discreet | 23 (69.7) | 4 (12.1) | |
Moderate | 3 (9.1) | 0 (0.0) | |
Accented | 2 (6.1) | 0 (0.0) | |
Lobular inflammation | 0.003 | ||
Absent | 21 (63.6) | 30 (90.9) | |
Discreet | 7 (21.2) | 3 (9.1) | |
Moderate | 3 (9.1) | 0 (0.0) | |
Accented | 2 (6.1) | 0 (0.0) | |
NASH | < 0.001 | ||
Absent | 6 (18.2) | 25 (75.8) | |
Grade 1 | 20 (60.6) | 5 (15.2) | |
Grade 2 | 4 (12.1) | 3 (9.1) | |
Grade 3 | 3 (9.1) | 0 (0.0) | |
Fibrosis | 0.033 | ||
Absent | 26 (78.8) | 27 (81.8) | |
Grade 1 | 3 (9.1) | 4 (12.1) | |
Grade 2 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
Grade 3 | 4 (12.1) | 2 (6.1) |
Table 8 Phase angle and body composition in patients who underwent liver biopsy after bariatric surgery, n = 33
Variables | Pre | Post | P value |
mean ± SD | mean ± SD | ||
BMI in kg/m² | 45.2 ± 6.9 | 31.8 ± 5.4 | < 0.001 |
SMM in kg | 31.9 ± 6.8 | 27.1 ± 5.3 | < 0.001 |
BCM in kg | 37.0 ± 7.8 | 32.1 ± 5.9 | < 0.001 |
Fat mass in kg | 60.7 ± 13.3 | 33.6 ± 11.1 | < 0.001 |
% Fat | 51.6 ± 3.5 | 39.8 ± 8.2 | < 0.001 |
Visceral fat area in cm² | 249.3 ± 23.1 | 162.5 ± 52.3 | < 0.001 |
PA full body ° | 5.93 ± 0.65 | 4.91 ± 0.60 | < 0.001 |
PA RA ° | 5.55 ± 0.77 | 4.61 ± 0.64 | < 0.001 |
PA LA ° | 5.44 ± 0.86 | 4.44 ± 0.58 | < 0.001 |
PA Tr ° | 7.84 ± 1.24 | 6.73 ± 1.03 | < 0.001 |
PA RL ° | 6.42 ± 0.72 | 5.18 ± 0.68 | < 0.001 |
PA LL ° | 6.38 ± 0.74 | 5.19 ± 0.66 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Teixeira J, Marroni CA, Zubiaurre PR, Henz A, Faina L, Pinheiro LK, Mottin CC, Fernandes SA. Phase angle and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease before and after bariatric surgery. World J Hepatol 2020; 12(11): 1004-1019
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v12/i11/1004.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v12.i11.1004