Elshaarawy O, Alkhatib A, Elhelbawy M, Gomaa A, Allam N, Alsebaey A, Rewisha E, Waked I. Validation of modified albumin-bilirubin-TNM score as a prognostic model to evaluate patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol 2019; 11(6): 542-552 [PMID: 31293722 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v11.i6.542]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Omar Elshaarawy, MBChB, MSc, Attending Doctor, Departemnt of Hepatology, Gastroenterology and Liver Transplantation, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Meleg Road, Menoufia 3511, Egypt. oelshaarawy@liver.menofia.edu.eg
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Hepatol. Jun 27, 2019; 11(6): 542-552 Published online Jun 27, 2019. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v11.i6.542
Table 1 Characteristics of the included patients
Variable
Patients
n = 1912
Male gender, n (%)
1575 (82.4)
Age (yr, mean ± SD)
57(± 7.2)
Etiology
Hepatitis C
1369 (71.6)
Hepatitis B
468 (24.5)
Other
75 (3.9)
Albumin (g/L, mean ± SD)
31.4(± 4.6)
Bilirubin [µmol/L, median (IQR)]
24.5 (13.9-29.1)
Platelet count (x 109/L, mean ± SD)
96 (± 37.4)
AFP [µg/L, median (IQR)]
43 (10-184.3)
Tumor size [cm, median (IQR)]
5.6 (1.8-8.4)
Solitary tumor, n (%)
369 (19.3)
PVT
345 (18)
Metastasis
148 (7.7)
ECOG grade 0, n (%)
1154 (60.4)
Treatment
Liver resection
67 (3.5)
Liver transplantation
43 (2.3)
Ablative procedures (PEI, RFA and microwave)
249 (13.1)
TACE
1036 (54.1)
Combined treatment (TACE + ablation)
8 (0.4)
Systemic therapy
40 (2.1)
Conservative
469 (24.5)
Overall survival, months (95%CI)
17.9 (12.1-13.8)
Overall deaths, n (%)
1219 (63.8)
Table 2 Multivariable Cox regression anaylysis
Variable
Hazard ratio (95%CI)
P-value
Tumour number
Solitary
1
Multiple
1.456 (1.236, 1.750)
<0.01
Log10 tumour size (cm)
3.517 (2.678, 4.567)
<0.001
Baseline log10 AFP
1.302 (1.208, 1.411)
<0.001
Baseline albumin
0.993 (0.966, 0.998)
0.031
Baseline log10 bilirubin
1.581 (1.139, 2.194)
<0.001
Vascular invasion
No
1
Yes
1.612 (1.251, 2.045)
0.001
Aetiology
Hepatitis C virus
1
hepatitis B virus
1.260 (1.020, 1.407)
<0.05
Others
0.914 (0.887, 0.991)
0.043
Table 3 Distribution and median survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma according to the studied staging systems
Staging/grading system
Stage/grade
Percentage of patients
Median survival (mo)
P-value
CTP
A
50.6
19
< 0.001
B
36.1
11
C
13.4
3.8
BCLC
0
3.6
25.4
< 0.001
A
27.5
19.8
B
26.6
16
C
28.9
8
D
13.4
4
TNM
I
19.5
23
< 0.001
II
36.6
18
III
35.4
8
IV
8.5
6
ALBI
1
12
28.6
< 0.001
2
63.2
14
3
24.7
5.8
PALBI
1
10.1
34.6
< 0.001
2
29
27.5
3
33.9
23.9
4
27
7.5
ALBI-based BCLC
0
1.5
Undefined
< 0.001
A
5.9
30.8
B
67.2
14.2
C
2.2
11
D
23.2
5
ALBI-T
0
2.6
42
< 0.001
1
18.1
28.9
2
30.4
17
3
31.1
8
4
16
5
5
1.8
3
Modified ALBI-T
0
2.6
42
< 0.001
1
9.1
28.9
2
18.5
20
3
27.9
14
4
25.5
8
5
14.6
5
6
1.8
3
Table 4 AUROC values for all scores at 1 and 3 years in addition to overall survival
Grade
1-yr AUROC
3-yr AUROC
Overall AUROC
TNM
0.639
0.626
0.620
CTP
0.672
0.649
0.643
ALBI
0.741
0.728
0.709
Modified ALBI
0.755
0.732
0.719
PALBI
0.753
0.741
0.734
BCLC
0.758
0.743
0.713
ALBI-based BCLC
0.762
0.751
0.749
ALBI-T
0.822
0.809
0.801
Modified ALBI-T
0.851
0.848
0.848
Citation: Elshaarawy O, Alkhatib A, Elhelbawy M, Gomaa A, Allam N, Alsebaey A, Rewisha E, Waked I. Validation of modified albumin-bilirubin-TNM score as a prognostic model to evaluate patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol 2019; 11(6): 542-552