Lim N, Sanchez O, Olson A. Impact on 30-d readmissions for cirrhotic patients with ascites after an educational intervention: A pilot study. World J Hepatol 2019; 11(10): 701-709 [PMID: 31749900 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v11.i10.701]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Nicholas Lim, MD, Assistant Professor, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 36, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States. nlim@umn.edu
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Cohort Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Hepatol. Oct 27, 2019; 11(10): 701-709 Published online Oct 27, 2019. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v11.i10.701
Table 1 Quality indicators for ascites
Refractory ascites
Diagnostic paracentesis in a timely manner
Aspirated fluid sent for cell count, differential and culture
Management with diuretics and sodium restriction in patients with
normal renal function
Table 2 Baseline characteristics, n (%)
Groups
Control (n = 39)
Intervention (n = 46)
P value
Female
18 (46.2)
19 (41.3)
0.7
Age, yr
51.9 (11.4)
54.9 (10.9)
0.2
Hepatology consult
22 (56.41)
30 (65.22)
0.4
MELD-Na score
25.5 (6.2)
26.1 (7.7)
0.7
Comorbidities
CAD
3 (7.69)
4 (8.7)
0.9
CKD
25 (64.1)
39 (84.78)
0.03
DM
11 (28.21)
17 (36.96)
0.4
HD
11 (28.21)
16 (34.78)
0.5
HIV
3 (7.69)
0 (0)
0.06
PVT
5 (12.82)
6 (13.04)
1
Etiology of cirrhosis
0.3
ETOH
23 (58.97)
21 (45.65)
Hepatitis C
1 (2.56)
5 (10.87)
ETOH/Hep C
3 (7.69)
2 (4.35)
Hepatitis B
3 (7.69)
1 (2.17)
NASH
4 (10.26)
8 (17.39)
Other
5 (12.82)
9 (19.57)
Table 3 Adherence to quality care and clinical outcomes, n (%)
Groups
Control (n = 39)
Intervention (n = 46)
P value
Quality care
22 (56.41)
25 (54.35)
0.9
Length of stay, d
8.95 (12.8)
11.1 (10.9)
0.4
Complications
17 (43.59)
21 (45.65)
0.9
30-d readmission
19 (52.78)
14 (35)
0.1
In-hospital mortality
3 (7.69)
6 (13.04)
0.4
30-d mortality
4 (11.11)
3 (7.5)
0.6
Total mortality
12 (30.77)
15 (32.61)
0.9
Table 4 Adjusted relative risk for clinical outcomes related to intervention group
Intervention [RR (95%CI)]
P value
Length of stay > 6 d
1.10 (0.69, 1.74)
0.1
Complications
0.93 (0.58, 1.50)
0.8
30-d readmission
0.62 (0.39, 1.00)
0.05
30-d mortality
0.95 (0.30, 2.99)
0.7
Total mortality
1.07 (0.54, 2.13)
0.8
Citation: Lim N, Sanchez O, Olson A. Impact on 30-d readmissions for cirrhotic patients with ascites after an educational intervention: A pilot study. World J Hepatol 2019; 11(10): 701-709