Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Hepatol. Feb 27, 2018; 10(2): 319-328
Published online Feb 27, 2018. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v10.i2.319
Published online Feb 27, 2018. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v10.i2.319
Table 1 Information about the entire population invited to complete the survey (n = 163)
Variable | Total | Level | n | Percent |
Completed survey | 163 | No | 72 | 44.2 |
Yes | 91 | 55.8 | ||
Gender | 163 | Female | 80 | 49.1 |
Male | 83 | 50.9 | ||
Primary practice location | 163 | Buffalo general medical center | 33 | 20.3 |
Erie county medical center | 56 | 34.4 | ||
Others | 74 | 45.4 | ||
Role in primary care clinic | 163 | Resident in training | 134 | 82.2 |
Supervising physician/attending | 29 | 17.8 | ||
Level of training1 | 143 | Resident PGY1 | 48 | 33.6 |
Resident PGY2 | 44 | 30.8 | ||
Resident PGY3 | 40 | 28.0 | ||
Resident PGY4 and above | 11 | 7.7 |
Table 2 Baseline characteristics of those individuals who responded to the survey (n = 91) from among the entire population invited to complete the survey (n = 163)
Variable | Total1 | Level | Count/Mean | Percent/SD |
Gender | 91 | Male | 50 | 55.0 |
Female | 41 | 45.1 | ||
Specialty of practice | 91 | Family medicine | 9 | 9.9 |
Others | 82 | 90.1 | ||
Primary practice location | 91 | Erie county medical center | 36 | 39.6 |
Buffalo general medical center | 29 | 31.9 | ||
Others | 26 | 28.6 | ||
Evaluated at least one HCV patient in past 2 yr | 90 | Yes | 47 | 52.2 |
No | 31 | 34.4 | ||
Not Sure | 12 | 13.3 | ||
Role in primary care clinic | 91 | Supervising physician/attending | 15 | 16.5 |
Resident in training | 76 | 83.5 | ||
Level of training | 85 | Resident PGY1 | 25 | 29.4 |
Resident PGY2 | 30 | 35.3 | ||
Resident PGY3 or above | 30 | 35.3 | ||
Awareness of age-based rule for screening | 85 | Yes | 49 | 57.6 |
No | 36 | 42.4 | ||
Implementation of age-based rule for screening | 85 | Yes | 34 | 40.0 |
No | 51 | 60.0 | ||
Knowledge of HCV natural history | 85 | Scores from 0 to 18 | 10.6 | 4.7 |
Knowledge of HCV treatment | 82 | Scores from 0 to 19 | 11.0 | 2.9 |
Table 3 Regression analysis for Box-Cox transformed knowledge of hepatitis C virus natural history
Variable | Level | Estimation | SD | P value |
Intercept | -24.90 | 1.39 | 0.001 | |
Knowledge of HCV treatment | 5.93 | 0.10 | 0.001 | |
Gender | Male | Reference level | ||
Female | 0.04 | 0.54 | 0.94 | |
Primary practice location | Erie county medical center | Reference level | ||
Buffalo general medical center | 0.54 | 0.77 | 0.49 | |
Others | -0.58 | 0.61 | 0.35 | |
At least one HCV patient in past 2 yr | Yes | Reference level | ||
No/not Sure | -0.54 | 0.65 | 0.41 | |
Level of training | Resident PGY 1 | Reference level | ||
Resident PGY 2 | -0.98 | 0.83 | 0.24 | |
Resident PGY 3 and above | 0.06 | 0.78 | 0.94 | |
Awareness of age-based rule for screening | Yes | Reference level | ||
No | -0.92 | 0.65 | 0.17 | |
Implementation of age-based rule for screening | Yes | Reference level | ||
No | -0.07 | 0.65 | 0.91 |
Table 4 Regression analysis for Box-Cox transformed knowledge of hepatitis C virus treatment
Variable | Level | Estimation | SD | P value |
Intercept | 11.98 | 2.12 | 0.001 | |
Knowledge of HCV natural history | score < 6 | Reference level | ||
6 ≤ score < 15 | -0.68 | 1.38 | 0.62 | |
15 ≤ score | -2.42 | 1.64 | 0.14 | |
Gender | Male | Reference level | ||
Female | 0.31 | 0.86 | 0.72 | |
Primary practice location | Erie county medical center | Reference level | ||
Buffalo general medical center | 0.27 | 1.20 | 0.82 | |
Others | -1.44 | 0.95 | 0.13 | |
At least one HCV patient in past 2 yr | Yes | Reference level | ||
No/not sure | 0.88 | 1.02 | 0.39 | |
Level of training | Resident PGY 1 | Reference level | ||
Resident PGY 2 | 1.51 | 1.30 | 0.25 | |
Resident PGY 3 and above | 1.76 | 1.25 | 0.16 | |
Awareness of age-based rule for screening | Yes | Reference level | ||
No | -2.21 | 1.00 | 0.03 | |
Implementation of age-based rule for screening | Yes | Reference level | ||
No | 1.01 | 1.01 | 0.32 |
Table 5 Regression analysis for implementation of birth cohort screening recommendations
Variable | Level | Estimate | SD | P value |
Intercept | -4.48 | 2.19 | 0.04 | |
Knowledge of HCV treatment | -0.02 | 0.11 | 0.86 | |
Knowledge of HCV natural history | 0.27 | 0.08 | 0.002 | |
Gender | Male | Reference level | ||
Female | -0.94 | 0.68 | 0.17 | |
Primary practice location | Erie county medical center | Reference level | ||
Buffalo general medical center | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.34 | |
Others | -0.36 | 0.72 | 0.62 | |
At least one HCV patient in past 2 yr | Yes | Reference level | ||
No/not sure | 2.43 | 0.90 | 0.001 | |
Level of training | Resident PGY1 | Reference level | ||
Resident PGY2 | 1.57 | 1.18 | 0.19 | |
Resident PGY3 or above | 1.62 | 1.15 | 0.16 | |
Awareness of age-based rule for screening | Yes | Reference level | ||
No | -2.32 | 0.88 | 0.01 |
Table 6 Primary care physician screening practices for hepatitis C virus infection
Question | Total | Option | Count | Percent |
In the past 2 yr, have you ordered a test with an intention to screen for HCV? | 85 | Yes | 75 | 88.2 |
No or Not Sure | 10 | 11.8 | ||
What is the strongest indication to screen for HCV? | 85 | Risk factor identified on patient encounter | 26 | 30.6 |
Patients born between 1945-1965 | 17 | 20.0 | ||
Abnormal liver enzymes | 42 | 49.4 | ||
How have you screened for hepatitis C? | 85 | HCV antibody | 47 | 55.3 |
Anti HCV antibody and HCV RNA PCR | 11 | 12.9 | ||
Other combinations of Anti HCV antibody, HCV RNA, liver function tests, and "let the lab choose" | 27 | 31.8 | ||
Do you follow professional society guidelines for HCV screening? | 85 | Yes | 61 | 71.8 |
No | 24 | 28.2 |
Table 7 Primary care physician practice patterns for hepatitis C virus screening
Question | Total | Option | Count | Percent |
How often are HCV risk factors assessed during a clinic visit? | 85 | Always | 14 | 16.5 |
Often | 30 | 35.3 | ||
Sometimes | 25 | 29.4 | ||
Rarely or never | 16 | 18.8 | ||
Do you order an HCV screening test after identifying at least one risk factor? | 85 | Always | 28 | 32.9 |
Often | 30 | 35.3 | ||
Sometimes or rarely | 27 | 31.8 | ||
Do you document HCV screening discussion/risk factor assessment in the health maintenance section of the patient’s chart? | 85 | Always or often | 20 | 23.5 |
Sometimes | 24 | 28.2 | ||
Rarely | 29 | 34.1 | ||
Never | 12 | 14.1 |
Table 8 Primary care physician perceptions toward screening for hepatitis C virus
Question | Total | Option | Count | Percent |
Satisfied with the screening approach in the clinic | 85 | Yes | 26 | 30.6 |
No | 25 | 29.4 | ||
Not Sure | 34 | 40.0 | ||
What is the most effective strategy in screening HCV in your clinic | 85 | Incorporate risk based screening | 19 | 22.4 |
Incorporate birth cohort based screening | 11 | 12.9 | ||
Incorporate both risk based and birth cohort screening | 55 | 64.7 | ||
Most effect way to initiate screening during a clinic visit | 85 | Have patient fill out a screening questionnaire during wait period | 47 | 55.3 |
Incorporate mandatory screening questions into EMR | 19 | 22.4 | ||
Facilitate screening by use of posters in patient rooms | 9 | 10.6 | ||
Printed patient handout about screening | 10 | 11.7 |
Table 9 Primary care physician identified barriers to screening for hepatitis C virus (n = 85)
Option | Count | Percent |
Inconsistency in offering HCV screening as a part of pre-set health maintenance protocol, time constraints in obtaining all HCV risk factors, unawareness of screening guidelines | 14 | 16.5 |
Time constraints in obtaining all HCV risk factors | 12 | 14.1 |
Unawareness of screening guidelines | 12 | 14.1 |
Other combinations of inconsistency in offering HCV screening as a part of pre-set health maintenance protocol, time constraints in obtaining all HCV risk factors, taboo in asking confidential and personal information as outlined in the screening questionnaire, and unawareness of screening guidelines | 47 | 55.3 |
- Citation: Samuel ST, Martinez AD, Chen Y, Markatou M, Talal AH. Hepatitis C virus knowledge improves hepatitis C virus screening practices among primary care physicians. World J Hepatol 2018; 10(2): 319-328
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v10/i2/319.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v10.i2.319