Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Hepatol. Feb 27, 2018; 10(2): 172-185
Published online Feb 27, 2018. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v10.i2.172
Published online Feb 27, 2018. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v10.i2.172
Table 1 Summary of the major case reports in English (pub med indexed) on Glycogenic hepatopathy in type 1 diabetes mellitus
Ref. | Study design | Age/sex | HbA1C | Keto acidosis | Hepatomegaly | AST/ALT/ALP/T bili | Normalization of LFTs |
Ruschhaupt et al[1], 1970 | Case report | 13/M | NA | Yes | Yes | 9/14/115/128/NA | 5 d |
Berman et al[2], 1973 | Case report | 21/F | NA | Yes | Yes | UK | Expired (5 d) |
Olsson et al[3], 1989 | Case report | 15/F | NA | Yes | Yes | 535/417/570/NA | 10 d |
20/F | NA | No | Yes | 1117/1235/941/NA | 18 mo | ||
24/F | NA | Yes | No | 323/276/429/NA | NA | ||
Munns et al[4], 2000 | Case reports | 13/M | 14.1 | No | Yes | 132/135/170/NA | 4 wk |
17/F | 13.3 | No | Yes | 102/147/175/NA | 2 wk | ||
16/F | 12.2 | No | Yes | 567/316/196/NA | 2 wk | ||
Fridell et al[5], 2007 | Case report | 18/F | NA | Yes | Yes | Elevated/N | After pancreatic transplant |
21/M | NA | No | Yes | Elevated/N | After pancreatic transplant | ||
Cuthbertson et al[6], 2007 | Case report | 19/F | 12.2 | Yes | Yes | NA/800/132/N | NA |
Sayuk et al[7], 2007 | Case report | 19/F | 8.1 | Yes | Yes | 98/49/147/0.5 | NA |
37/M | 16.0 | Yes | Yes | 226/399/326/0.9 | NA | ||
Bassett et al[8], 2008 | Case report | 10/F | 10.1 | No | No | 143/147/137/N | NA |
Abaci et al[9], 2008 | Case report | 16/M | 11.1 | No | Yes | 66/58/431/0.8 | 3 mo |
Hudacko et al[10], 2008 | Case report | 20/F | 13.3 | No | Yes | 249/383/NA/NA | 5 mo |
Sweetser et al[11], 2010 | Case report | 27/M | 15.0 | No | Yes | 6720/2549/529/1.7 | 3 mo |
Van Den Brand[12], 2009 | Case report | 29/F | 15.3 | No | No | 2500/1000/316/NA | NA |
Saxena et al[13], 2010 | Case report | 33/F | 13.7 | No | No | 428/404/205/N | 12 mo |
Bua et al[14], 2010 | Case report | 17/F | 12.0 | No | Yes | 138/164/NA/NA | 12 mo |
Aljabri et al[15], 2011 | Case report | 13/F | 13.0 | No | Yes | NA/500/137/N | 3 mo |
Dantuluri et al[16], 2012 | Case report | 14/F | 11.0 | No | Yes | Elevated | Few days |
Lin et al[17], 2012 | Case report | 10/ F | 12.8 | Yes | Yes | 121/194/185/NA | 6 mo |
Messeri et al[18], 2012 | Case report | 31/F | 10.3 | No | Yes | 225/258/375/0.54 | 2 mo |
Murata et al[19], 2012 | Case report | 21/M | 6.2 | Yes | No | 119/122/NA/NA | 25 d |
Cha et al[20], 2012 | Case report | 22/F | 13.8 | No | Yes | 1028/365/346/0.5 | 8 wk |
26/F | 12.9 | Yes | Yes | 914/307/189/0.5 | 4 wk | ||
20/F | 13.6 | No | No | 1310/346/132/0.2 | 16 wk | ||
Saadi T[21], 2012 | Case report | 18/M | 11.0 | No | Yes | 144/92/123/1.4 | 3 mo |
Saikusa et al[22], 2012 | Case report | 13/M | 12.0 | No | Yes | 100/191/NA/NA | NA |
Imtiaz et al[23], 2013 | Case report | 19/F | 14.6 | Yes | Yes | NA/199/139/NA | 5 mo |
Butts et al[24], 2014 | Case report | 13/F | 8.8 | Yes | Yes | NA/113/NA/NA | NA |
Jeong et al[25], 2014 | Case report | 13/F | 10.7 | Yes | Yes | 105/84/NA/NA | 3 mo |
Martin et al[26], 2014 | Case report | 13/M | 10.4 | Yes | Yes | 3969/1196/NA/NA | 16 d |
Parmar et al[27], 2015 | Case report | 21/F | NA | Yes | Yes | 4202/973/N/N | 1 wk |
Xu et al[28], 2015 | Case report | 22/M | 14.6 | No | Yes | 331/223/223/0.3 | NA |
Garcia-Suarez et al[29], 2015 | Case report | 28/F | 10.5 | No | Yes | 1600/534/N/N | NA |
Atmaca et al[30], 2015 | Case report | 19/M | NA | Yes | Yes | 603/570/921/NA | 3 wk |
Irani et al[31], 2015 | Case report | 19/M | 12.0 | Yes | Yes | 505/345/145/N | NA |
Brouwers et al[32], 2015 | Case report | 19/F | 9.5 | No | Yes | Elevated | NA |
19/F | 13.3 | No | Yes | Elevated | NA | ||
17/M | 12.7 | No | Yes | Elevated | NA | ||
20/F | 14.7 | No | Yes | Elevated | NA | ||
Charndrasekaran et al[33], 2015 | Case report | 5/F | 16.1 | Yes | Yes | 53/20/NA/0.7 | NA |
Silva et al[34], 2016 | Case report | 21/F | 9.0 | Yes | Yes | 110/120/190/0.74 | Few days |
20/F | 10.1 | Yes | Yes | 270/423/179/1 | Few days | ||
29/F | 10.9 | No | Yes | 910/461/172/0.35 | 3 mo | ||
22/M | 15.7 | Yes | Yes | 226/109/79/0.64 | 2 wk | ||
Deemer et al[35], 2016 | Case report | 18/F | 11.3 | Yes | Yes | NA/36/120/N | NA |
Saracho et al[36], 2016 | Case report | 14/M | 12.8 | Yes | Yes | Elevated | NA |
Chandel et al[37], 2017 | Case report | 12/F | 10.5 | Yes | Yes | 690/356/158/0.2 | 3 mo |
Ikarashi et al[38], 2017 | Case report | 21/M | 11.7 | No | Yes | 2723/956/NA/NA | 1 mo |
24/F | 11.0 | Yes | Yes | 658/216/NA/NA | Few days | ||
19/F | 13.6 | Yes | Yes | 737/266/NA/NA | Few days | ||
29/F | 16.5 | Yes | Yes | 469/243/NA/NA | 6 mo | ||
Maharaj et al[39], 2017 | Case report | 23/F | 12.3 | Yes | Yes | 127/199/160/2.7 | Few days |
Al Sarkhy et al[40], 2017 | Case report | 6/M | 11.6 | Yes | Yes | 367/205/221/N | Few days |
Shah et al[41], 2017 | Case report | 31/F | NA | Yes | Yes | 627/185/280/0.7 | NA |
Omer[42], 2017 | Case report | 14/M | 11.0 | Yes | Yes | Normal | NA |
Table 2 Summary of the major studies in English (pub med indexed) on Glycogenic hepatopathy in type 1 diabetes mellitus
Ref. | Study design | Age/sex | HbA1C | Keto acidosis | Hepatomegaly | Liver abnormality | Normalization of LFTs |
Chatila et al[43], 1996 | Retrospective Study | Mild Fibrosis (14%) | 11patients (8-A and 3-P) | ||||
41/F | NA | NA | No | 20/45/1.4 x ULN/0.35 | Few days to weeks | ||
21/F | NA | NA | No | 282/404/0.4 x ULN/0.28 | Few days to weeks | ||
58/F | NA | NA | Yes | 35/56/3.2 x ULN/0.40 | Few days to weeks | ||
70/F | NA | NA | Yes | 76/NA/NA/1.28 | Few days to weeks | ||
36/F | NA | NA | No | 40/86/2.1 x ULN/0.28 | Few days to weeks | ||
46/F | NA | NA | Yes | 22/20/1.7 x ULN/N | Few days to weeks | ||
23/F | NA | NA | Yes | 265/410/9.5 x ULN/0.40 | Few days to weeks | ||
19/F | NA | NA | Yes | 344/532/2.6 x ULN/0.8 | Few days to weeks | ||
13/M | NA | NA | Yes | 940/910/2 x ULN/0.30 | Few days to weeks | ||
13/M | NA | NA | Yes | 85/NA/0.3 x ULN/0.48 | Few days to weeks | ||
15/M | NA | NA | Yes | NA/NA/1.9 x ULN/0.08 | Few days to weeks | ||
Torbenson et al[44], 2006 | Retrospective Study | 14 patients | |||||
19/F | NA | Yes | Yes | 97/83/80/NA | NA | ||
1/2M | 13.5 | Yes | Yes | 49/47/182/NA | NA | ||
22/F | NA | No | Yes | 48/77/62/NA | NA | ||
8/M | NA | No | Yes | Elevated/NA | NA | ||
15/F | NA | No | NA | Normal | NA | ||
22/M | 16 | Yes | Yes | 1100/360/251/NA | NA | ||
25/M | 10.8 | NA | NA | 1629/1128/298/NA | NA | ||
16/M | NA | Yes | NA | Elevated/NA | NA | ||
20/M | 9.9 | No | yes | N/120/147/NA | NA | ||
18/F | 10.8 | No | NA | N/57/N/NA | NA | ||
28/M | NA | No | NA | 1099/1544/384/NA | NA | ||
34/M | 10.1 | No | Yes | N/NA/N/NA | NA | ||
16/M | NA | No | Yes | 1413/1354/476/NA | NA | ||
23/F | NA | No | Yes | 255/224/307/NA | NA | ||
Fitzpatrick et al[45], 2014 | Retrospective | 31 patients | 11(Mean) | Yes-all | 76/76/NA/NA(M) | NA | 14 (73%) Fibrosis |
16M/15F | 12Mild and 2Bridging | ||||||
Median age 15 | Fibrosis | ||||||
Mukewar et al[46], 2017 | Case control study | 20 patients | 11.4(Mean) 55% | 88.90% | 301/308/170/0.5(M) | 8 mo | 10% Mild fibrosis but no bridging fibrosis |
16F/4M | |||||||
24-A, 12-P |
Table 3 Summary of the major case reports in English (PubMed indexed) on Glycogenic hepatopathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus
Ref. | Study design | Age/sex | Type of DM/insulin | A1C | Keto acidosis | Hepatomegaly | AST/ALT/ALP/T bili | normalization fibrosis of LFTs |
Olson et al[3], 1989 | Case report | 39/M | Type 2/insulin | NA | Yes | No | 429/764/1882/NA | 21 d |
Tsujimoto et al[47], 2006 | Case report | 41/M | Type 2/insulin | 10 | No | Yes | 1064/1024/202/2.3 | 17 d |
Umpaichitra[48], 2016 | Case report | 15/M | T2DM/metformin | 6.5 | No | Yes | 245/330/N/N | 18 mo |
Table 4 Summary of the published articles in English (PubMed indexed) on Glycogenic hepatopathy without DM
Ref. | Pathology | Study design | Age/sex | Hepatomegaly | AST/ALT/ALP/ T bili | Normalization | Fibrosis of LFTs |
Resnick et al[56], 2011 | Dumping syndrome | Case report | 2/M | No | NA/199/NA/NA | 16 mo | No fibrosis |
Kransdorf et al[57], 2015 | Anorexia nervosa | Case report | 26/F | NA | 75/101/108/ | NA | No fibrosis |
Iancu et al[58], 1986 | Steroids use | Retrospective | 6 mo-14 yr | Yes | Normal | 3-5 d | No fibrosis |
Table 5 Summery of the main differential diagnosis for glycogenic hepatopathy
Main etiology | Clinical presentation | Imaging characteristics | Key, liver biopsy pathological features | Diagnosis | Management | Cirrhosis | |
GH | Acquired excessive glycogen deposition in the liver mostly seen in patients with T1DM | Hyperglycemia with hyperglycemic symptoms; could be asymptomatic. Liver enzyme elevation is mild to extreme range in some case | US and CT shows increased echogenicity. Dual-Echo MRI; iso-intense between the in-phase and out-of-phase images, and low intensity on subtraction | Glycogen deposition in the cytoplasm with swollen hepatocytes, with or without mild steatosis and fibrosis. Diastase digestion of glycogen cause hepatocytes to turn into “ghost cells” | Radiologic and liver biopsy | Optimal control of DM | May have mild fibrosis, severe fibrosis is very rare and seen in only a few reported cases |
GSD | Inborn errors of glucose and glycogen metabolism results in abnormal deposition of glycogen | Presentation varies depend on types of GSDs They will have manifestations of a liver, kidney, and skeletal muscle involvement with hypoglycemia, hepatomegaly, muscle cramps, and weakness, etc | Like GH | Findings vary in different type of GSDs; Nonspecific histologic findings to PAS positive glycogen deposition which could be diastase sensitive or resistant | Biochemical tests and molecular testing | Symptomatic treatment to dietary changes to maintain the blood glucose level and pharmacologic therapy in different types of GSDs. May need liver transplantation in selected cases | Some GSD can progress to cirrhosis |
NAFLD | Hepatic steatosis | Most patients asymptomatic and some may have minor symptoms, Liver enzymes elevation usually < 5 times upper limit of normal | US and CT shows increased echogenicity. Dual-Echo MRI; low intensity on the in-phase image, and high intensity on the out-of-phase image and high intensity on subtraction. | Steatosis with or without lobular inflammation and hepatocyte ballooning. May have varying degrees of fibrosis | Radiologic and liver biopsy | Lifestyle modification and pharmacologic therapies. May need liver transplant in advanced cirrhosis | Can progress to cirrhosis |
Hepatosclerosis | Is a hepatic manifestation of microangiopathic disease seen in long -standing DM | Often clinically silent, Serum aminotransferases are normal or minimally elevated. ALP, Total bilirubin may be elevated | No specific imaging characteristics | Extensive dense perisinusoidal fibrosis | Liver biopsy | Unknown | Unknown |
AIH | Chronic Hepatitis of unknown etiology | Spectrum of clinical manifestations ranges from asymptomatic patients to those with considerable symptoms, and rarely presents with acute liver failure | No characteristic imaging features, may show cirrhotic liver in advance case | Interface hepatitis and portal lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate with varying degree of fibrosis | Characteristic biochemical tests and liver biopsy | Glucocorticoid monotherapy or in combination with immunomodulators. Rarely may require liver transplantation | Can progress to cirrhosis |
Hemochromatosis | Autosomal recessive disorder. Mutations cause increased iron absorption and excessive deposition in the liver, heart, pancreas, and pituitary | Asymptomatic or chronic liver disease with elevated transaminases, skin pigmentation, DM, arthropathy, impotence and cardiac enlargement, etc | MRI is most sensitive and can estimate iron concentration in the liver. Dual-Echo MRI; demonstrates decreased signal intensity in the affected tissues on the in-phase images compared with the out of- phase images (opposite of steatosis) | A liver biopsy will reveal iron overload. Presence of cirrhosis can be determined | Biochemical tests including genetic testing, radiologic, and liver biopsy | Phlebotomy or Chelation therapy if unable to tolerate phlebotomy | Can progress to cirrhosis |
Wilson disease | Autosomal recessive disorder with impaired cellular copper transport and impaired biliary copper excretion results in accumulation of copper most notably the liver, brain, and cornea. | Predominantly hepatic, neurologic, and psychiatric manifestations. Elevated transaminases mild to moderate and ALP may be markedly subnormal | US, CT, may show signs of cirrhosis and normal caudate lobe which is contrary to other types cirrhosis | Vary largely from fatty changes to cirrhosis and occasionally fulminant hepatic necrosis. Can be stained for copper | Biochemical tests and slit lamp examination with or without genetic testing and liver biopsy | Treatment with a chelating agent. Some cases may require liver transplantation | Can progress to cirrhosis |
Acute viral hepatitis A, B, C, D and E. Rarely, HSV, VZ, EBV and CMV | Hepatitis A and E are transmitted by feco- oral route; Rest of the viruses spread either by sexual contact, contact with body fluids or blood or from birth from an infected mother | Many of the symptoms are nonspecific; May have marked elevation in transaminases often > 15 times the normal | US or CT findings are nonspecific; Could be used to rule out other causes | Liver biopsy shows hepatocyte necrosis with a portal, periportal and lobular lymphocytic infiltration; Plasma cells present during resolving phase | Diagnosis by biochemical tests | Treatment conservative or antiviral therapy | Acute infection may progress to chronic, and that may progress to cirrhosis |
- Citation: Sherigar JM, Castro JD, Yin YM, Guss D, Mohanty SR. Glycogenic hepatopathy: A narrative review. World J Hepatol 2018; 10(2): 172-185
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v10/i2/172.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v10.i2.172